• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西的大豆接种剂:质量控制概述

Soybean inoculants in Brazil: an overview of quality control.

作者信息

de Souza Gabriela Kalinowski, Sampaio Jamilla, Longoni Letícia, Ferreira Silviane, Alvarenga Samuel, Beneduzi Anelise

机构信息

Universidade La Salle, Av. Vítor Barreto, 2288, Canoas, RS, CEP 92010-000, Brazil.

Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária (ex-FEPAGRO) da Secretaria da Agricultura, Pecuária e Irrigação (SEAPI) do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Gonçalves Dias, 570, Porto Alegre, RS, CEP 90130-060, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Microbiol. 2019 Jan;50(1):205-211. doi: 10.1007/s42770-018-0028-z. Epub 2018 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1007/s42770-018-0028-z
PMID:30637629
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6863340/
Abstract

The bacterial strains SEMIA 587 and 5019 (Bradyrhizobium elkanii), 5079 (Bradyrhizobium japonicum), and 5080 (Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens) are recommended for soybean inoculants in Brazil. In several countries, the current regulations are insufficient to induce companies for improving the quality of their products, leading to low performance and subsequent abandonment of inoculant use. From 2010 to 2014, 1086 samples coming mainly from Argentina and the southern region of Brazil were analyzed for viable cells counting, strains identification, and purity analysis according to the SDA/MAPA no. 30/2010 Normative Instruction. Most products were imported and formulated in liquid carriers with 5.0 × 10 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL. The strains most frequently used were SEMIA 5079/5080. Only 2.21% of samples had contaminants. The guaranteed concentration of viable cells in inoculants mostly ranged from 4.1 × 10 to 5.0 × 10 CFU/mL or CFU/g. The most frequently found concentration was above 1.1 × 10 CFU/mL or CFU/g, which was higher than the product guarantee. The inoculants used for soybean crop in Brazil have excellent quality, leading the country to the leadership in taking advantage of the biological nitrogen fixation benefits for a productive and sustainable agriculture.

摘要

巴西推荐使用SEMIA 587和5019菌株(埃尔坎根瘤菌)、5079菌株(日本慢生根瘤菌)以及5080菌株(高效固氮根瘤菌)制作大豆接种剂。在一些国家,现行法规不足以促使企业提高产品质量,导致接种剂性能不佳,随后接种剂的使用被弃用。2010年至2014年期间,根据第30/2010号规范性指令SDA/MAPA,对主要来自阿根廷和巴西南部地区的1086个样本进行了活细胞计数、菌株鉴定和纯度分析。大多数产品是进口的,且以液体载体配制,含有5.0×10个菌落形成单位(CFU)/mL。最常使用的菌株是SEMIA 5079/5080。只有2.21%的样本有污染物。接种剂中活细胞的保证浓度大多在4.1×10至5.0×10 CFU/mL或CFU/g之间。最常发现的浓度高于1.1×10 CFU/mL或CFU/g,高于产品保证值。巴西用于大豆作物的接种剂质量优良,使该国在利用生物固氮优势实现高产和可持续农业方面处于领先地位。

相似文献

1
Soybean inoculants in Brazil: an overview of quality control.巴西的大豆接种剂:质量控制概述
Braz J Microbiol. 2019 Jan;50(1):205-211. doi: 10.1007/s42770-018-0028-z. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
2
Developing a genomic-based strategy to confirm microbial identity in bio-inputs containing multiple strains: an easy, fast, and low-cost multiplex PCR applied to inoculants carrying soybean Bradyrhizobium.开发基于基因组的策略以确认含有多种菌株的生物投入物中的微生物身份:一种应用于携带大豆慢生根瘤菌的接种剂的简便、快速且低成本的多重PCR方法。
Braz J Microbiol. 2024 Sep;55(3):2869-2877. doi: 10.1007/s42770-024-01441-8. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
3
Identification of soybean Bradyrhizobium strains used in commercial inoculants in Brazil by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.利用 MALDI-TOF 质谱法鉴定巴西商业接种剂中使用的大豆慢生根瘤菌菌株。
Braz J Microbiol. 2019 Oct;50(4):905-914. doi: 10.1007/s42770-019-00104-3. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
4
Comparative genomic analysis of strains with natural variability in the efficiency of nitrogen fixation, competitiveness, and adaptation to stressful edaphoclimatic conditions.具有固氮效率、竞争力和适应土壤气候条件能力自然变异的 菌株的比较基因组分析。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jul 2;12(7):e0026024. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00260-24. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
5
Genomic identification and characterization of the elite strains Bradyrhizobium yuanmingense BR 3267 and Bradyrhizobium pachyrhizi BR 3262 recommended for cowpea inoculation in Brazil.推荐用于巴西豇豆接种的慢生根瘤菌元明慢生根瘤菌BR 3267和大豆慢生根瘤菌BR 3262优良菌株的基因组鉴定与特性分析
Braz J Microbiol. 2018 Oct-Dec;49(4):703-713. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
6
Genetic variation in symbiotic islands of natural variant strains of soybean and differing in competitiveness and in the efficiency of nitrogen fixation.大豆天然变异株共生岛的遗传变异,这些变异株在竞争力和固氮效率上存在差异。
Microb Genom. 2022 Apr;8(4). doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000795.
7
Feasibility of transference of inoculation-related technologies: A case study of evaluation of soybean rhizobial strains under the agro-climatic conditions of Brazil and Mozambique.接种相关技术转移的可行性:以巴西和莫桑比克农业气候条件下大豆根瘤菌菌株评估为例的研究
Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2018 Jul 1;261:230-240. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.06.037.
8
Genetic variability in Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains nodulating soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill].大豆根瘤菌(Bradyrhizobium japonicum)菌株的遗传变异性及其对大豆(Glycine max (L.) Merrill)的结瘤作用。
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012 Apr;28(4):1831-5. doi: 10.1007/s11274-011-0964-3. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
9
Growth-promoting effects of Bradyrhizobium soybean symbionts in black oats, white oats, and ryegrass.大豆根瘤菌共生体对黑麦草、燕麦和黑麦的促生长作用。
Braz J Microbiol. 2021 Sep;52(3):1451-1460. doi: 10.1007/s42770-021-00523-1. Epub 2021 May 22.
10
Impact of pesticides in properties of Bradyrhizobium spp. and in the symbiotic performance with soybean.农药对慢生根瘤菌属特性及其与大豆共生性能的影响。
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020 Oct 17;36(11):172. doi: 10.1007/s11274-020-02949-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of sublethal stress application on the survival of bacterial inoculants: a systematic review.亚致死胁迫处理对细菌接种剂存活的影响:系统评价。
Arch Microbiol. 2023 Apr 13;205(5):190. doi: 10.1007/s00203-023-03542-8.
2
Unique Rhizobial Communities Dominated by Bradyrhizobium liaoningense and Bradyrhizobium ottawaense were Found in Vegetable Soybean Nodules in Osaka Prefecture, Japan.在日本大阪府的蔬菜大豆根瘤中发现了以辽宁根瘤菌和渥太华根瘤菌为主的独特根瘤菌群。
Microbes Environ. 2023;38(2). doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME22081.
3
Microbials for Agriculture: Why Do They Call Them Biostimulants When They Mean Probiotics?农业用微生物制剂:既然指的是益生菌,为何称它们为生物刺激剂?
Microorganisms. 2023 Jan 6;11(1):153. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11010153.
4
Genetic variation in symbiotic islands of natural variant strains of soybean and differing in competitiveness and in the efficiency of nitrogen fixation.大豆天然变异株共生岛的遗传变异,这些变异株在竞争力和固氮效率上存在差异。
Microb Genom. 2022 Apr;8(4). doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000795.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative genomics of Bradyrhizobium japonicum CPAC 15 and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens CPAC 7: elite model strains for understanding symbiotic performance with soybean.大豆共生性能理解的模式菌株:慢生根瘤菌 CPAC15 和联合固氮菌 CPAC7 的比较基因组学
BMC Genomics. 2014 Jun 3;15(1):420. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-420.
2
Challenges of formulation and quality of biofertilizers for successful inoculation.生物肥料的配方和质量挑战,以实现成功接种。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013 Oct;97(20):8859-73. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5228-8. Epub 2013 Sep 15.
3
Polyphasic evidence supporting the reclassification of Bradyrhizobium japonicum group Ia strains as Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens sp. nov.多项证据支持将大豆慢生根瘤菌组 Ia 菌株重新分类为慢生根瘤菌 diazoefficiens 新种。
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013 Sep;63(Pt 9):3342-3351. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.049130-0. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
4
A simple method to evaluate the number of bradyrhizobia on soybean seeds and its implication on inoculant quality control.一种简单的方法来评估大豆种子中慢生根瘤菌的数量及其对接种剂质量控制的影响。
AMB Express. 2011 Jul 19;1(1):21. doi: 10.1186/2191-0855-1-21.
5
[Quality of commercial inoculants for soybean crop in Argentina: concentration of viable rhizobia and presence of contaminants].[阿根廷大豆作物商业接种剂的质量:根瘤菌活菌浓度及污染物存在情况]
Rev Argent Microbiol. 2010 Apr-Jun;42(2):129-32. doi: 10.1590/S0325-75412010000200013.
6
Variability in Bradyrhizobium japonicum and B. elkanii seven years after introduction of both the exotic microsymbiont and the soybean host in a cerrados soil.在塞拉多土壤中引入外来微共生体和大豆宿主七年后,日本慢生根瘤菌和埃氏慢生根瘤菌的变异性。
Microb Ecol. 2007 Feb;53(2):270-84. doi: 10.1007/s00248-006-9149-2.
7
Genetic regulation of biological nitrogen fixation.生物固氮的遗传调控
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004 Aug;2(8):621-31. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro954.