Sanjuán Juan, Nápoles Maria Caridad, Pérez-Mendoza Daniel, Lorite María J, Rodríguez-Navarro Dulce N
Department of Soil and Plant Microbiology, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, CSIC, 18008 Granada, Spain.
Departamento de Fisiología y Bioquímica Vegetal, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Agrícolas (INCA), Carretera San José-Tapaste, Km 3½, Gaveta Postal 1, San José de las Lajas CP 32700, Mayabeque, Cuba.
Microorganisms. 2023 Jan 6;11(1):153. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11010153.
There is growing interest in using plant-beneficial microorganisms to partially replace chemicals and help reduce the environmental impact of agriculture. Formulated microbial products or inoculants for agriculture contain single strains or a consortium of live microbes, well characterized and biosafe, which can contribute to the growth, health, and development of a plant host. This concept conforms to the definition of probiotics. However, some plant-growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPMs) have been considered a category of biostimulants since some years ago, despite the traditional concept of biostimulants involves substances or materials with no fertilizer value, which in minute amounts promote plant growth. The inclusion of PGPMs together with substances has also involved a significant distortion of the classical concept of biostimulants. Regulations such as the recent EU Fertilizing Products Regulation (EU No. 2019/1009) have incorporated the new definition of biostimulants and included microbials as a subcategory of biostimulants. We discuss that this regulation and the forthcoming European harmonized standards disregard some key features of microbial products, such as the live, true biological nature of their active principles. The factors that determine the complex functional compatibility of plant-microbe associations, and important biosafety issues that concern the intentional release of microbes into the environment, seem to be also ignored. We anticipate that by equating microbials to chemicals, the biological nature of microbial products and their specific requirements will be underestimated, with pernicious consequences for their future development and success.
利用对植物有益的微生物来部分替代化学物质并帮助减少农业对环境的影响,这一兴趣正与日俱增。用于农业的配方微生物产品或接种剂包含单一菌株或活微生物群落,它们特性明确且生物安全,有助于植物宿主的生长、健康和发育。这一概念符合益生菌的定义。然而,自若干年前起,一些促进植物生长的微生物(PGPMs)就被视为一类生物刺激剂,尽管传统的生物刺激剂概念涉及没有肥料价值但能微量促进植物生长的物质或材料。将PGPMs与其他物质一起纳入也导致了生物刺激剂经典概念的重大扭曲。诸如最近的欧盟肥料产品法规(欧盟第2019/1009号)等法规已经纳入了生物刺激剂的新定义,并将微生物作为生物刺激剂的一个子类别。我们认为,该法规及即将出台的欧洲统一标准忽视了微生物产品的一些关键特征,比如其活性成分的活体、真实生物学性质。决定植物 - 微生物关联复杂功能兼容性的因素以及与向环境中有意释放微生物相关的重要生物安全问题似乎也被忽视了。我们预计,将微生物等同于化学物质会低估微生物产品的生物学性质及其特定要求,对其未来的发展和成功产生有害影响。