Suppr超能文献

血流限制训练对下肢的近侧、远侧和对侧影响:一项随机对照试验。

Proximal, Distal, and Contralateral Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on the Lower Extremities: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Rochester Regional Health Orthopaedics, Pittsford, New York.

出版信息

Sports Health. 2019 Mar/Apr;11(2):149-156. doi: 10.1177/1941738118821929. Epub 2019 Jan 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

: Blood flow restriction (BFR) training involves low-weight exercises performed under vascular occlusion via an inflatable cuff. For patients who cannot tolerate high-load exercises, BFR training reportedly provides the benefits of high-load regimens, with the advantage of less tissue and joint stress.

HYPOTHESIS

: Low-load BFR training is safe and efficacious for strengthening muscle groups proximal, distal, and contralateral to tourniquet placement in the lower extremities.

STUDY DESIGN

: Randomized controlled trial.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

: Level 1.

METHODS

: This was a randomized controlled trial of healthy participants completing a standardized 6-week course of BFR training. Patients were randomized to BFR training on 1 extremity or to a control group. Patients were excluded for cardiac, pulmonary, or hematologic disease; pregnancy; or previous surgery in the extremity. Data collected at baseline and completion included limb circumferences and strength testing.

RESULTS

: The protocol was completed by 26 patients, providing 16 BFR and 10 control patients (mean patient age, 27 years; 62% female). A statistically greater increase in strength was seen proximal and distal to the BFR tourniquet when compared with both the nontourniquet extremity and the control group ( P < 0.05). Approximately twice the improvement was seen in the BFR group compared with controls. Isokinetic testing showed greater increases in knee extension peak torque (3% vs 11%), total work (6% vs 15%), and average power (4% vs 12%) for the BFR group ( P < 0.04). Limb circumference significantly increased in both the thigh (0.8% vs 3.5%) and the leg (0.4% vs 2.8%) compared with the control group ( P < 0.01). Additionally, a significant increase occurred in thigh girth (0.8% vs 2.3%) and knee extension strength (3% vs 8%) in the nontourniquet BFR extremity compared with the control group ( P < 0.05). There were no reported adverse events.

CONCLUSION

: Low-load BFR training led to a greater increase in muscle strength and limb circumference. BFR training had similar strengthening effects on both proximal and distal muscle groups. Gains in the contralateral extremity may corroborate a systemic or crossover effect.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

: BFR training strengthens muscle groups proximal, distal, and contralateral to cuff placement. Patients undergoing therapy for various orthopaedic conditions may benefit from low-load BFR training with the advantage of less tissue stress.

摘要

背景

血流限制(BFR)训练涉及通过可充气袖带在血管闭塞下进行低重量的练习。对于不能耐受高负荷运动的患者,据报道,BFR 训练提供了高负荷方案的益处,其优点是组织和关节压力较小。

假设

对下肢止血带放置处近端、远端和对侧的肌肉群进行低负荷 BFR 训练是安全有效的。

研究设计

随机对照试验。

证据水平

1 级。

方法

这是一项针对健康参与者的随机对照试验,他们完成了为期 6 周的 BFR 训练标准课程。患者随机分为 BFR 训练组或对照组。有心脏、肺部或血液疾病、怀孕或肢体以前手术史的患者被排除在外。基线和完成时收集的数据包括肢体围度和力量测试。

结果

26 名患者完成了方案,提供了 16 名 BFR 和 10 名对照组患者(平均患者年龄 27 岁,62%为女性)。与非止血带肢体和对照组相比,BFR 止血带近端和远端的力量明显增加(P < 0.05)。BFR 组的改善约为对照组的两倍。等速测试显示,BFR 组的膝关节伸展峰值扭矩(3%比 11%)、总工作量(6%比 15%)和平均功率(4%比 12%)有更大的增加(P < 0.04)。与对照组相比,大腿(0.8%比 3.5%)和小腿(0.4%比 2.8%)的肢体周长明显增加(P < 0.01)。与对照组相比,非止血带 BFR 肢体的大腿围度(0.8%比 2.3%)和膝关节伸展力量(3%比 8%)也显著增加(P < 0.05)。没有报告不良事件。

结论

低负荷 BFR 训练导致肌肉力量和肢体周长的显著增加。BFR 训练对止血带放置处的近端和远端肌肉群都有类似的增强作用。对侧肢体的增益可能证实了全身或交叉效应。

临床相关性

BFR 训练增强了止血带放置处近端、远端和对侧的肌肉群。正在接受各种骨科疾病治疗的患者可能受益于低负荷 BFR 训练,其优点是组织压力较小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3089/6391554/92369384b305/10.1177_1941738118821929-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验