Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles; Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles.
Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles.
Surgery. 2019 Mar;165(3):501-509. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.08.021. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
Recent trends toward regionalization of complex surgical procedures may increase the risk for care fragmentation during readmissions. Conflicting conclusions have been reported regarding risk factors and consequences of nonindex readmissions (ie, readmission to a separate hospital than the one where surgery was originally performed). We seek to perform a comprehensive review of existing literature.
Four electronic databases were searched to identify all eligible studies examining the risk factors and outcomes of postoperative nonindex readmission. The pooled odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated using a random-effects model.
A total of 444 studies were retrieved from database searches and 23 were included after applying eligibility criteria. Nonindex readmissions constituted 10%-47% of 30-day readmissions. Risk factors for nonindex readmission predominantly represented proxy variables for patient care access that may not be modifiable, such as residing in a location further away from the original hospital, being older in age, living in rural areas, and having lower income. Nonindex readmissions occurred more commonly under urgent conditions. Ten of the 14 studies that employed short-term mortality as the primary outcome concluded that nonindex readmissions were significantly associated with higher mortality after adjusting for available confounders.
The findings of the current study suggest that nonindex readmission is a common phenomenon after surgery and is associated with increased mortality. Further studies are required to evaluate whether enhancing health information continuity between hospitals would be helpful for mitigating the adverse consequences of care fragmentation.
复杂手术程序的区域化趋势可能会增加再入院期间护理碎片化的风险。关于非索引再入院(即,到与最初手术医院不同的医院再次入院)的风险因素和后果,已有相互矛盾的结论报告。我们旨在对现有文献进行全面回顾。
搜索了四个电子数据库,以确定所有研究手术非索引再入院的风险因素和结果的合格研究。使用随机效应模型计算合并优势比和 95%置信区间。
从数据库搜索中检索到 444 项研究,经过适用的合格标准后,纳入了 23 项研究。非索引再入院占 30 天再入院的 10%-47%。非索引再入院的风险因素主要代表患者护理获取的代理变量,这些变量可能不可改变,例如居住在离原始医院更远的地方、年龄较大、居住在农村地区和收入较低。非索引再入院更常见于紧急情况下。14 项研究中有 10 项将短期死亡率作为主要结局,结论是在调整了可用的混杂因素后,非索引再入院与死亡率升高显著相关。
本研究的结果表明,非索引再入院是手术后常见的现象,并且与死亡率升高有关。需要进一步研究评估是否增强医院之间的健康信息连续性有助于减轻护理碎片化的不良后果。