National School of Development, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Sociology, School of Social Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; Manchester Institute for Collaborative Research on Ageing, School of Social Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; Cathie Marsh Institute for Social Research, School of Social Sciences, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Health Place. 2019 Jul;58:102073. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
Unprecedented internal migration to urban areas has happened in China over the last few decades. While, we know that migration has a bidirectional relationship with health, this relationship has only been studied to a limited extent in China. In particular, the exiting literature has neglected the effects of migration on health and well-being in later life, instead focusing on the relationship between these outcomes over the short term, and also have only focused on temporary rural-to-urban migrants with a rural hukou rather than the broader range of internal migration flows. The hukou system, also known as the Chinese household system, an institutional feature with the power to restrict population mobility and access to local welfare resources. Using an inter-disciplinary approach, drawing on literature from economics, epidemiology and sociology, this paper conceptualises and examines the association between different forms of internal migration and their relationship with later-life health and well-being in China. It then attempts to draw conclusions on likely mechanisms through which migration affects health and well-being, including taking account of the selective nature of migration. To do this, we use the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), a nationally representative and multi-disciplinary dataset that examines the circumstances of the Chinese population aged over 45 years old. The results show that there are strong associations between migration status and later life health and well-being in China, with migrants to or within urban areas report the greatest health. Even after controlling for the selective nature of migration and other post-migration factors, there is still an unexplained, positive and statistically significant association between temporary rural-to-urban migration and depression scores. In addition, there are no differences between rural-to-rural migrants and rural non-migrants across all models. In terms of relevant mechanisms, selection of migrants seems to be particularly important in explaining the health and mental health differences between non-migrants and migrants to or within urban areas. Current socioeconomic circumstances and post-migration adaptation also explain some health differences between migrant groups and non-migrants.
在过去几十年中,中国经历了前所未有的人口向城市内部迁移。虽然我们知道迁移与健康之间存在双向关系,但在中国,这一关系仅在有限的范围内进行了研究。特别是,现有文献忽略了迁移对晚年健康和幸福感的影响,而是侧重于短期内在这些结果之间的关系,并且仅关注具有农村户籍的临时农村到城市的移民,而不是更广泛的内部迁移流动。户籍制度,又称中国户籍制度,是一种具有限制人口流动和获取当地福利资源权力的制度特征。本文采用跨学科方法,借鉴经济学、流行病学和社会学的文献,概念化和检验了不同形式的内部迁移与晚年健康和幸福感之间的关联,并试图通过考虑迁移的选择性来得出可能的机制结论。为了做到这一点,我们使用了中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS),这是一个具有代表性和多学科的数据集,研究了 45 岁以上中国人口的情况。结果表明,在中国,迁移状况与晚年健康和幸福感之间存在很强的关联,流向或流入城市地区的移民报告的健康状况最好。即使在控制了迁移的选择性和其他迁移后因素后,临时农村到城市的迁移与抑郁评分之间仍然存在无法解释的、积极的和统计学上显著的关联。此外,在所有模型中,农村到农村的移民和农村非移民之间没有差异。就相关机制而言,移民的选择似乎对于解释非移民和流向或流入城市地区的移民之间的健康和心理健康差异尤为重要。当前的社会经济状况和迁移后的适应也解释了移民群体和非移民之间的一些健康差异。