Laboratoire d'Automatique, de Mécanique, et d'Informatique industrielles et Humaines-UMR CNRS 8201, Université Polytechnique Hauts-de-France, Valenciennes, France.
School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jul;100(7):1259-1266. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.12.023. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
To investigate ankle torque and steadiness in the intact leg of transtibial and transfemoral unilateral amputees.
Comparative study.
Medical rehabilitation centers.
Fifteen persons with a unilateral transfemoral amputation, 8 persons with a transtibial amputation, and 14 able-bodied male participants volunteered to participate in this study (N=37).
Not applicable.
Maximal isometric torque performed during ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion in the intact limb of amputees and in the dominant limb of able-bodied persons. The coefficient of variation (CV) of the plantarflexion torque was calculated over 5 seconds during a submaximal isometric contraction (15%) in order to assess torque steadiness. Furthermore, electromyographic activity (the root mean square amplitude) of the gastrocnemius medialis and tibialis anterior muscles was analyzed.
Plantarflexion maximal torque was significantly higher for the able-bodied group (115±39 Nm) than for the group with a transfemoral amputation (77±34 Nm) (P<.01), and did not differ between able-bodied group and the group with a transtibial amputation (97±26 Nm) (P=.25). Furthermore, the transfemoral amputee group was 29% less steady than the able-bodied group (P=.01). However, there were no significant differences in torque steadiness between the able-bodied group and transtibial amputee group (P=.26) or between transtibial and transfemoral amputee groups (P=.27). The amputation had no significant effect between groups on dorsiflexion maximal torque (P=.10), gastrocnemius medialis electromyography (EMG) (P=.85), tibialis anterior coactivation (P=.95), and coactivation ratio (P=.75).
The present study suggests that as the level of amputation progresses from below the knee to above the knee, the effect on the intact ankle is progressively more negative.
研究胫骨截肢和股骨截肢的单侧截肢者健肢的踝关节扭矩和稳定性。
对比研究。
医疗康复中心。
15 名单侧股骨截肢者、8 名胫骨截肢者和 14 名健全男性志愿者自愿参加本研究(N=37)。
不适用。
测量截肢者健肢和健全人优势肢在进行踝关节跖屈和背屈时的最大等长扭矩。在 15%(15%)的次最大等长收缩(15%)期间,计算跖屈扭矩的变异系数(CV),以评估扭矩稳定性。此外,分析比目鱼肌和胫骨前肌的肌电图(均方根振幅)活动。
健全组的跖屈最大扭矩(115±39 Nm)明显高于股骨截肢组(77±34 Nm)(P<.01),且与胫骨截肢组(97±26 Nm)无差异(P=.25)。此外,股骨截肢组的稳定性比健全组低 29%(P=.01)。然而,在健全组和胫骨截肢组之间(P=.26)或胫骨截肢组和股骨截肢组之间(P=.27),扭矩稳定性无显著差异。截肢对各组背屈最大扭矩(P=.10)、比目鱼肌肌电图(EMG)(P=.85)、胫骨前肌协同收缩(P=.95)和协同收缩比(P=.75)均无显著影响。
本研究表明,随着截肢部位从膝下到膝上的进展,对健肢的影响逐渐变得更负面。