Suppr超能文献

经颅直流电刺激治疗精神分裂症的荟萃分析:“更多是否更好?”

A meta-analysis of transcranial direct current stimulation for schizophrenia: "Is more better?".

机构信息

Multimodal Imaging Group, Research Imaging Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Multimodal Imaging Group, Research Imaging Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2019 Mar;110:117-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.12.009. Epub 2018 Dec 10.

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has generated interest in recent years as a potential adjunctive treatment for patients with schizophrenia. The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of tDCS on positive symptoms, particularly auditory hallucinations, and negative symptoms. A literature search of randomized sham-controlled trials was conducted using the OVID database on October 9, 2018. The standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated to examine changes in symptom severity between active and sham groups for the following symptom domains: auditory hallucinations, positive symptoms (including auditory hallucinations), and negative symptoms. Moderator analyses were performed to examine the effects of study design and participant demographics. We identified 10 eligible studies. Main-analyses showed no effects of tDCS on auditory hallucinations (7 studies, n = 242), positive symptoms (9 studies, n = 313), or negative symptoms (9 studies, n = 313). Subgroup analyses of studies that applied twice-daily stimulation showed a significant reduction in the severity of auditory hallucinations (4 studies, n = 138, SMD = 1.04, p = 0.02). Studies that applied ≥10 stimulation sessions showed a reduction in both auditory hallucination (5 studies, n = 186, SMD = 0.86, p = 0.009) and negative symptom severity (7 studies, n = 257, SMD = 0.41, p = 0.04). Meta-regression analyses revealed a negative association between mean age and the SMDs for auditory hallucinations and negative symptoms, and a positive association between baseline negative symptom severity and the SMDs for negative symptoms. Our findings highlight the need to optimize tDCS parameters and suggest twice-daily or 10 or more stimulation sessions may be needed to improve clinical outcomes in patients with schizophrenia.

摘要

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)近年来作为精神分裂症患者的辅助治疗方法引起了关注。本荟萃分析的主要目的是评估 tDCS 对阳性症状(尤其是幻听)和阴性症状的疗效。我们于 2018 年 10 月 9 日在 OVID 数据库中检索了随机假对照试验的文献。我们计算了标准化均数差值(SMD),以评估活跃组和假组之间症状严重程度的变化,用于以下症状领域:幻听、阳性症状(包括幻听)和阴性症状。我们进行了调节分析,以检验研究设计和参与者人口统计学特征的影响。我们确定了 10 项符合条件的研究。主要分析显示 tDCS 对幻听(7 项研究,n=242)、阳性症状(9 项研究,n=313)或阴性症状(9 项研究,n=313)均无影响。对应用每日两次刺激的研究进行亚组分析显示,幻听严重程度显著降低(4 项研究,n=138,SMD=1.04,p=0.02)。应用≥10 次刺激的研究显示,幻听(5 项研究,n=186,SMD=0.86,p=0.009)和阴性症状严重程度(7 项研究,n=257,SMD=0.41,p=0.04)均降低。元回归分析显示,幻听和阴性症状的 SMD 与平均年龄呈负相关,阴性症状的 SMD 与基线阴性症状严重程度呈正相关。我们的研究结果强调了优化 tDCS 参数的必要性,并表明每日两次或 10 次以上的刺激可能需要改善精神分裂症患者的临床结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验