Reply to Amirav and Newhouse: PC versus PD: Why Change a Scientifically Well-Established and Clinically Relevant Test?
作者信息
Kaminsky David, Coates Allan, Culver Bruce, Cockcroft Donald, Hallstrand Teal, Haynes Jeffrey, MacIntyre Neil, Wanger Jack
机构信息
1 University of Vermont College of Medicine Burlington, Vermont.
2 University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
出版信息
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Apr 15;199(8):1038. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201811-2216LE.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reply to Amirav and Newhouse: PC versus PD: Why Change a Scientifically Well-Established and Clinically Relevant Test?对阿米拉夫和纽豪斯的回复：电脑验光（PC）与散瞳验光（PD）：为何要改变一项科学上已确立且临床相关的检查？
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Apr 15;199(8):1038. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201811-2216LE.
2
PC versus PD: Why Change a Scientifically Well-Established and Clinically Relevant Test?配对比较法（PC）与成组比较法（PD）：为何要改变一项科学依据充分且临床相关性强的检测方法？
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Apr 15;199(8):1037-1038. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201809-1765LE.
3
Provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 should be used to interpret methacholine challenge tests with modern nebulizers.使用能使第一秒用力呼气容积（FEV1）下降20%的激发剂量的乙酰甲胆碱，来解读使用现代雾化器进行的乙酰甲胆碱激发试验。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Mar;12(3):357-63. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201409-433OC.
4
Relationship between airway reactivity induced by methacholine or ultrasonically nebulized distilled cold water and BAL fluid cellular constituents in patients with sulfur mustard gas-induced asthma.硫芥气诱导哮喘患者中，乙酰甲胆碱或超声雾化蒸馏水诱导的气道反应性与支气管肺泡灌洗（BAL）液细胞成分之间的关系。
J Aerosol Med. 2007 Fall;20(3):342-51. doi: 10.1089/jam.2007.0589.
5
Methacholine Challenge: Comparison of Airway Responsiveness Produced by a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus a Jet Nebulizer.乙酰甲胆碱激发试验：振动网式雾化器与射流雾化器产生的气道反应性比较。
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2018 Apr;31(2):88-93. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2017.1392. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
6
The PD but not the PC in a methacholine challenge test is device independent.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017 Apr;118(4):508-509. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
7
Comparison of 2 dosimeters by methacholine challenge.通过乙酰甲胆碱激发试验对两种剂量计进行比较。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Nov;120(5):1218-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.06.020. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
8
Dose vs concentration in methacholine challenge.乙酰甲胆碱激发试验中的剂量与浓度
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2007 Jun;98(6):598. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60744-2.
9
Nebulizer output for methacholine challenges with the KoKo Digidoser.使用KoKo Digidoser进行乙酰甲胆碱激发试验时的雾化器输出量。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Oct;116(4):924-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.06.015. Epub 2005 Aug 19.
10
Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999.1999年乙酰甲胆碱和运动激发试验指南。本美国胸科学会的官方声明于1999年7月由ATS董事会通过。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Jan;161(1):309-29. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.1.ats11-99.
本文引用的文献
1
Characterizing Nebulizer Performance for Methacholine Challenge Tests.表征用于乙酰甲胆碱激发试验的雾化器性能。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Oct 15;198(8):988-990. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201805-0942ED.
Zotero 插件