Egeler Sabine A, Johnson Anna Rose, Ibrahim Ahmed M S, Bucknor Alexandra, Chen Austin, Malyar Masoud, Tobias Adam M, Lin Samuel J, Mureau Marc A M, Lee Bernard T
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Mar/Apr;30(2):412-417. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005137.
Defects following Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) can range in size from small defects requiring linear closure to large defects needing flap coverage. Reconstruction is dependent on defect size and facial aesthetic unit involvement. The aim of this study was to review the types of facial reconstruction per aesthetic unit involvement and describe their outcomes.
All data were retrieved for patients ≥18 years who underwent multidisciplinary treatment including dermatological MMS and plastic surgical reconstruction at a single tertiary hospital center (2001-2017). Patient characteristics, tumor pathology, surgical specifics, reconstructive modalities, and surgical outcomes were analyzed.
A total of 418 patients were included. Patients were predominantly White, non-Hispanic (97%) and female (58%) with a mean age of 60 ± 13.9 years. Tumor pathology was predominantly basal cell carcinoma in 73% of all cases followed by squamous cell carcinoma in 14%. The nasal aesthetic unit was mostly affected (50%). Local advancement flaps and different types of grafts were used in 51% and 25% of reconstructions, respectively. Complications were observed in 3% and local cancer recurrence in 4% of the patients. Scar revision was needed in 6% of the patients.
Reconstruction of facial defects after Mohs micrographic surgery can be challenging due to its technical complexity and aesthetic implications. There were differences in complications in reconstructions performed within the same day versus 1 week, with a majority of complications occurring within same-day Mohs reconstructions. A multidisciplinary structured approach, which incorporates patient-reported outcomes, may be needed to optimize surgical results.
莫氏显微外科手术(MMS)后的缺损大小不一,小缺损可通过线性缝合修复,大缺损则需要皮瓣覆盖。修复方式取决于缺损大小和面部美学单元受累情况。本研究旨在回顾根据美学单元受累情况进行的面部修复类型,并描述其效果。
检索了在一家三级医院中心接受多学科治疗(包括皮肤科莫氏显微外科手术和整形外科修复)的18岁及以上患者的所有数据(2001 - 2017年)。分析了患者特征、肿瘤病理、手术细节、修复方式和手术效果。
共纳入418例患者。患者以非西班牙裔白人为主(97%),女性占58%,平均年龄为60±13.9岁。肿瘤病理以基底细胞癌为主,占所有病例的73%,其次是鳞状细胞癌,占14%。鼻美学单元受累最为常见(50%)。局部推进皮瓣和不同类型的移植分别用于51%和25%的修复手术。3%的患者出现并发症,4%的患者出现局部癌症复发。6%的患者需要进行瘢痕修复。
由于技术复杂性和美学影响,莫氏显微外科手术后的面部缺损修复具有挑战性。同日修复与1周后修复的并发症存在差异,大多数并发症发生在同日莫氏修复手术中。可能需要一种多学科结构化方法,纳入患者报告的结果,以优化手术效果。