Holle Daniela, Müller-Widmer Rene, Reuther Sven, Rosier-Segschneider Ute, Graf Rabea, Roes Martina, Halek Margareta
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Stockumer Str. 12, 58453, Witten, Germany.
Faculty of Health, University of Witten/Herdecke, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, 58455, Witten, Germany.
Trials. 2019 Jan 14;20(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3147-9.
A system of dementia-specific case conferences (WELCOME-IdA) was evaluated using a stepped-wedge design in six nursing homes (NHs) to enable nursing staff to analyse properly the behavioural and psychological symptoms (BPSD) of residents with dementia. A process evaluation of the context, the recruitment and target populations reached (residents and nursing staff) and the delivery of the intervention and implementation strategy was carried out to explore the lack of effectiveness of WELCOME-IdA on the residents' prevalence of BPSD.
This study was part of a larger process evaluation using a mixed-methods design. Standardised questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, attendance lists, standardised protocols and written self-reports were used to collect the data. The quantitative data were analysed by calculating descriptive statistics. The qualitative interviews were analysed using deductive content analysis and the self-reports were analysed using a documentary analysis.
None of the NHs had prior experience with dementia-specific case conferences on a specific concept related to BPSD. The number of residents for whom a dementia-specific case conference was held was lower than expected. The number of nursing staff reached was high, although as defined in the study protocol, core nursing teams continuously participating in all components of the intervention were not established throughout the study. An analysis of the delivery of the intervention showed a reduction in the frequency of dementia-specific case conferences and deviations in the process structure and role structure of WELCOME-IdA. The strategy used to facilitate the implementation of WELCOME-IdA was mostly followed. An analysis of the recruitment of residents indicated that the variation in which residents were included in the study sample was high and that the intended sample size required to achieve a power >80% was not reached.
An analysis of the process evaluation data indicated that there were inaccuracies in the implementation of WELCOME-IdA and there were methodological limitations within the design of the effectiveness trial, both of which could explain the lack of effectiveness of WELCOME-IdA. To optimise the process structure of WELCOME-IdA, an assessment of BPSD and a pre-selection of possible domains for the behavioural analysis could be conducted prior to a dementia-specific case conference.
ISRCTN20203855 . Registered on 10 July 2013.
采用阶梯楔形设计在六家养老院对痴呆症专项病例讨论会(WELCOME-IdA)系统进行了评估,以使护理人员能够正确分析痴呆症患者的行为和心理症状(BPSD)。对背景、招募情况和所覆盖的目标人群(居民和护理人员)以及干预措施和实施策略的实施情况进行了过程评估,以探究WELCOME-IdA在降低居民BPSD患病率方面缺乏有效性的原因。
本研究是一项采用混合方法设计的更大规模过程评估的一部分。使用标准化问卷、半结构化访谈、出勤名单、标准化方案和书面自我报告来收集数据。通过计算描述性统计量对定量数据进行分析。使用演绎性内容分析法对定性访谈进行分析,使用文献分析法对自我报告进行分析。
没有一家养老院此前有过与BPSD相关特定概念的痴呆症专项病例讨论会的经验。召开痴呆症专项病例讨论会的居民人数低于预期。所覆盖的护理人员数量较多,不过,按照研究方案的定义,在整个研究过程中未组建持续参与干预所有环节的核心护理团队。对干预措施实施情况的分析显示,痴呆症专项病例讨论会的频率有所降低,且WELCOME-IdA的流程结构和角色结构出现偏差。促进WELCOME-IdA实施所采用的策略大多得到遵循。对居民招募情况的分析表明,纳入研究样本的居民差异很大,且未达到实现功效>80%所需的预定样本量。
对过程评估数据的分析表明,WELCOME-IdA的实施存在偏差,且有效性试验设计存在方法学局限性,这两点都可以解释WELCOME-IdA缺乏有效性的原因。为优化WELCOME-IdA的流程结构,可在痴呆症专项病例讨论会之前对BPSD进行评估,并对行为分析的可能领域进行预选。
ISRCTN20203855。于2013年7月10日注册。