Suppr超能文献

科学受众、错误信息和假新闻。

Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news.

机构信息

Department of Life Sciences Communication, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 16;116(16):7662-7669. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805871115. Epub 2019 Jan 14.

Abstract

Concerns about public misinformation in the United States-ranging from politics to science-are growing. Here, we provide an overview of how and why citizens become (and sometimes remain) misinformed about science. Our discussion focuses specifically on misinformation among individual citizens. However, it is impossible to understand individual information processing and acceptance without taking into account social networks, information ecologies, and other macro-level variables that provide important social context. Specifically, we show how being misinformed is a function of a person's ability and motivation to spot falsehoods, but also of other group-level and societal factors that increase the chances of citizens to be exposed to correct(ive) information. We conclude by discussing a number of research areas-some of which echo themes of the 2017 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's report-that will be particularly important for our future understanding of misinformation, specifically a systems approach to the problem of misinformation, the need for more systematic analyses of science communication in new media environments, and a (re)focusing on traditionally underserved audiences.

摘要

美国公众对错误信息的担忧日益加剧,范围涉及政治和科学等领域。在此,我们概述了公民是如何以及为何会对科学产生(并有时一直保持)误解。我们的讨论专门针对个别公民的错误信息。然而,如果不考虑提供重要社会背景的社交网络、信息生态系统和其他宏观层面变量,就不可能理解个人的信息处理和接受方式。具体来说,我们展示了错误信息是一个人识别虚假信息的能力和动机的函数,但也与其他群体层面和社会层面的因素有关,这些因素增加了公民接触正确信息的可能性。最后,我们讨论了一些研究领域——其中一些与 2017 年美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院的报告中的主题相呼应——这些领域对于我们未来对错误信息的理解将特别重要,特别是错误信息问题的系统方法、新媒体环境中更系统地分析科学传播的必要性,以及重新关注传统上服务不足的受众。

相似文献

1
Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news.科学受众、错误信息和假新闻。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 16;116(16):7662-7669. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805871115. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
4
The Psychology of Fake News.假新闻的心理学。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 May;25(5):388-402. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
6
Scientific communication in a post-truth society.后真相社会中的科学传播。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 16;116(16):7656-7661. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805868115. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
9
Fake news: Why do we believe it?假新闻:我们为什么会相信它?
Joint Bone Spine. 2022 Jul;89(4):105371. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2022.105371. Epub 2022 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

2
Who Cares How Information Feels? A Call for Digital Influence Literacy.谁在乎信息给人的感受?呼吁具备数字影响力素养。
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2025 Jun 6;17(3):477-493. doi: 10.1007/s41649-024-00350-0. eCollection 2025 Jul.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Improving university students' web savvy: An intervention study.提高大学生网络素养:一项干预研究。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2019 Sep;89(3):485-500. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12279. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
2
The spread of true and false news online.网络上真实和虚假新闻的传播。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1146-1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559.
3
The science of fake news.假新闻的科学。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1094-1096. doi: 10.1126/science.aao2998. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
6
Why Education Predicts Decreased Belief in Conspiracy Theories.为何教育会导致对阴谋论的信任度下降。
Appl Cogn Psychol. 2017 Jan-Feb;31(1):50-58. doi: 10.1002/acp.3301. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
7
The "Majority Illusion" in Social Networks.社交网络中的“多数错觉”。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 17;11(2):e0147617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147617. eCollection 2016.
9
Science communication as political communication.作为政治传播的科学传播。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 16;111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13585-92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317516111. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
10
The science of sharing and the sharing of science.分享的科学与科学的分享。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 16;111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13642-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317511111. Epub 2014 Sep 15.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验