• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

后真相社会中的科学传播。

Scientific communication in a post-truth society.

机构信息

Department of Political Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.

Department of Sociology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 16;116(16):7656-7661. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805868115. Epub 2018 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1805868115
PMID:30478050
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6475392/
Abstract

Within the scientific community, much attention has focused on improving communications between scientists, policy makers, and the public. To date, efforts have centered on improving the content, accessibility, and delivery of scientific communications. Here we argue that in the current political and media environment faulty communication is no longer the core of the problem. Distrust in the scientific enterprise and misperceptions of scientific knowledge increasingly stem less from problems of communication and more from the widespread dissemination of misleading and biased information. We describe the profound structural shifts in the media environment that have occurred in recent decades and their connection to public policy decisions and technological changes. We explain how these shifts have enabled unscrupulous actors with ulterior motives increasingly to circulate fake news, misinformation, and disinformation with the help of trolls, bots, and respondent-driven algorithms. We document the high degree of partisan animosity, implicit ideological bias, political polarization, and politically motivated reasoning that now prevail in the public sphere and offer an actual example of how clearly stated scientific conclusions can be systematically perverted in the media through an internet-based campaign of disinformation and misinformation. We suggest that, in addition to attending to the clarity of their communications, scientists must also develop online strategies to counteract campaigns of misinformation and disinformation that will inevitably follow the release of findings threatening to partisans on either end of the political spectrum.

摘要

在科学界,人们非常关注如何改善科学家、政策制定者和公众之间的沟通。迄今为止,相关努力主要集中在提高科学传播的内容、可及性和传递方式上。在这里,我们认为在当前的政治和媒体环境下,沟通不畅不再是问题的核心。对科学事业的不信任和对科学知识的误解越来越不是源于沟通问题,而是源于误导性和有偏见信息的广泛传播。我们描述了近几十年来媒体环境发生的深刻结构变化,以及这些变化与公共政策决策和技术变革的联系。我们解释了这些变化如何使得心怀不轨、动机不纯的人在网络喷子、机器人和应答者驱动算法的帮助下,越来越多地传播虚假新闻、错误信息和谣言。我们记录了在公共领域中普遍存在的高度党派敌意、隐含的意识形态偏见、政治两极化和出于政治动机的推理,并提供了一个实际的例子来说明,在媒体上通过基于互联网的虚假信息和错误信息运动,如何系统地歪曲明确表述的科学结论。我们建议,除了关注沟通的清晰度之外,科学家们还必须制定在线策略,以对抗必然会在发布对政治光谱两端的党派有威胁的发现后出现的错误信息和虚假信息运动。

相似文献

1
Scientific communication in a post-truth society.后真相社会中的科学传播。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 16;116(16):7656-7661. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805868115. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
2
The Psychology of Fake News.假新闻的心理学。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 May;25(5):388-402. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
3
Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news.科学受众、错误信息和假新闻。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 16;116(16):7662-7669. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805871115. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
4
Why the backfire effect does not explain the durability of political misperceptions.为什么逆火效应不能解释政治误解的持久性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 13;118(15). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912440117.
5
A Signal Detection Approach to Understanding the Identification of Fake News.一种用于理解假新闻识别的信号检测方法。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Jan;17(1):78-98. doi: 10.1177/1745691620986135. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
6
Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning.懒惰而非偏见:党派虚假新闻的易感性可以更好地用缺乏推理来解释,而不是用动机推理来解释。
Cognition. 2019 Jul;188:39-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
7
Media hype: Patient and scientific perspectives on misleading medical news.媒体炒作:误导性医疗新闻的患者和科学视角。
Mov Disord. 2017 Sep;32(9):1319-1323. doi: 10.1002/mds.26993. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
8
Social Psychological Predictors of Belief in Fake News in the Run-Up to the 2019 Hungarian Elections: The Importance of Conspiracy Mentality Supports the Notion of Ideological Symmetry in Fake News Belief.2019年匈牙利大选前夕假新闻信念的社会心理预测因素:阴谋心态的重要性支持了假新闻信念中意识形态对称性的观点。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 24;12:790848. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.790848. eCollection 2021.
9
Ingraining Polio Vaccine Acceptance through Public Service Advertisements in the Digital Era: The Moderating Role of Misinformation, Disinformation, Fake News, and Religious Fatalism.通过数字时代的公益广告培养脊髓灰质炎疫苗接种意愿:错误信息、虚假信息、假新闻和宗教宿命论的调节作用
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Oct 17;10(10):1733. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10101733.
10
Social learning and partisan bias in the interpretation of climate trends.社会学习与党派偏见对气候趋势解读的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 25;115(39):9714-9719. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1722664115. Epub 2018 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Modeling Algal Toxin Dynamics and Integrated Web Framework for Lakes.湖泊藻类毒素动力学建模与集成网络框架
Toxins (Basel). 2025 Jul 3;17(7):338. doi: 10.3390/toxins17070338.
2
Shared disbelief and shared belief: Belief and disbelief as drivers of interpersonal neural synchronization during narrative processing.共同的怀疑与共同的信念:叙事加工过程中,信念与怀疑作为人际神经同步的驱动因素
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jun 10;122(23):e2422396122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2422396122. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
3
[Digital innovations in vaccination communication].[疫苗接种宣传中的数字创新]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Apr;68(4):408-415. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04019-3. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
4
The inaccurate citation of the "Universal Declaration of Animal Rights" (UDAR) in the scientific literature: a scoping review.科学文献中对《世界动物权利宣言》(UDAR)的引用不准确:一项范围综述。
BMC Vet Res. 2025 Feb 8;21(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-04470-z.
5
Critical thinking about health and treatments in the United States: a cross-sectional assessment of parents and undergraduate college students.美国父母与本科大学生对健康及治疗的批判性思维:一项横断面评估
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 27;25(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21291-9.
6
Independent SAGE as an example of effective public dialogue on scientific research.作为科学研究有效公众对话范例的独立紧急情况科学咨询小组。 (注:这里SAGE应是指Independent SAGE,全称为Independent Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies ,即独立紧急情况科学咨询小组 ,原文翻译可能因对SAGE具体所指不明确而存在一定模糊性,上述译文是按照常见释义给出,具体可根据实际背景灵活调整 )
Nat Protoc. 2025 May;20(5):1103-1113. doi: 10.1038/s41596-024-01089-6. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
7
Justifying an Invasion: When Is Disinformation Successful?为入侵行为辩护:虚假信息何时会成功?
Polit Commun. 2024 May 22;41(6):965-986. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2024.2352483. eCollection 2024.
8
Governing with public engagement: an anticipatory approach to human genome editing.通过公众参与进行治理:人类基因组编辑的前瞻性方法。
Sci Public Policy. 2024 Mar 25;51(4):680-691. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scae010. eCollection 2024 Aug.
9
Survey of international academic centers and institutes focused on human-animal bond: Scope and landscape in 2021.2021年对专注于人类与动物关系的国际学术中心和机构的调查:范围与概况
Hum Anim Interact. 2022 Dec;2022. doi: 10.1079/hai.2022.0026. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
10
Promotional language and the adoption of innovative ideas in science.宣传语言和科学创新思想的采用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jun 18;121(25):e2320066121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2320066121. Epub 2024 Jun 11.

本文引用的文献

1
The science of fake news.假新闻的科学。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1094-1096. doi: 10.1126/science.aao2998. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
2
Political science. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook.政治学。在 Facebook 上接触意识形态多样的新闻和观点。
Science. 2015 Jun 5;348(6239):1130-2. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1160. Epub 2015 May 7.
3
The Changing Bases of Segregation in the United States.美国种族隔离的变化基础。
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2009 Nov 1;626(1). doi: 10.1177/0002716209343558.
4
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test.测量内隐认知中的个体差异:内隐联想测验。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jun;74(6):1464-80. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1464.
5
The case for motivated reasoning.动机性推理的情况。
Psychol Bull. 1990 Nov;108(3):480-98. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480.