Suppr超能文献

后真相社会中的科学传播。

Scientific communication in a post-truth society.

机构信息

Department of Political Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.

Department of Sociology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 16;116(16):7656-7661. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805868115. Epub 2018 Nov 26.

Abstract

Within the scientific community, much attention has focused on improving communications between scientists, policy makers, and the public. To date, efforts have centered on improving the content, accessibility, and delivery of scientific communications. Here we argue that in the current political and media environment faulty communication is no longer the core of the problem. Distrust in the scientific enterprise and misperceptions of scientific knowledge increasingly stem less from problems of communication and more from the widespread dissemination of misleading and biased information. We describe the profound structural shifts in the media environment that have occurred in recent decades and their connection to public policy decisions and technological changes. We explain how these shifts have enabled unscrupulous actors with ulterior motives increasingly to circulate fake news, misinformation, and disinformation with the help of trolls, bots, and respondent-driven algorithms. We document the high degree of partisan animosity, implicit ideological bias, political polarization, and politically motivated reasoning that now prevail in the public sphere and offer an actual example of how clearly stated scientific conclusions can be systematically perverted in the media through an internet-based campaign of disinformation and misinformation. We suggest that, in addition to attending to the clarity of their communications, scientists must also develop online strategies to counteract campaigns of misinformation and disinformation that will inevitably follow the release of findings threatening to partisans on either end of the political spectrum.

摘要

在科学界,人们非常关注如何改善科学家、政策制定者和公众之间的沟通。迄今为止,相关努力主要集中在提高科学传播的内容、可及性和传递方式上。在这里,我们认为在当前的政治和媒体环境下,沟通不畅不再是问题的核心。对科学事业的不信任和对科学知识的误解越来越不是源于沟通问题,而是源于误导性和有偏见信息的广泛传播。我们描述了近几十年来媒体环境发生的深刻结构变化,以及这些变化与公共政策决策和技术变革的联系。我们解释了这些变化如何使得心怀不轨、动机不纯的人在网络喷子、机器人和应答者驱动算法的帮助下,越来越多地传播虚假新闻、错误信息和谣言。我们记录了在公共领域中普遍存在的高度党派敌意、隐含的意识形态偏见、政治两极化和出于政治动机的推理,并提供了一个实际的例子来说明,在媒体上通过基于互联网的虚假信息和错误信息运动,如何系统地歪曲明确表述的科学结论。我们建议,除了关注沟通的清晰度之外,科学家们还必须制定在线策略,以对抗必然会在发布对政治光谱两端的党派有威胁的发现后出现的错误信息和虚假信息运动。

相似文献

1
Scientific communication in a post-truth society.后真相社会中的科学传播。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 16;116(16):7656-7661. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805868115. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
2
The Psychology of Fake News.假新闻的心理学。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 May;25(5):388-402. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
3
Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news.科学受众、错误信息和假新闻。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 16;116(16):7662-7669. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805871115. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
5
A Signal Detection Approach to Understanding the Identification of Fake News.一种用于理解假新闻识别的信号检测方法。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Jan;17(1):78-98. doi: 10.1177/1745691620986135. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
10
Social learning and partisan bias in the interpretation of climate trends.社会学习与党派偏见对气候趋势解读的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 25;115(39):9714-9719. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1722664115. Epub 2018 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

3
[Digital innovations in vaccination communication].[疫苗接种宣传中的数字创新]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Apr;68(4):408-415. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04019-3. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
7
Justifying an Invasion: When Is Disinformation Successful?为入侵行为辩护:虚假信息何时会成功?
Polit Commun. 2024 May 22;41(6):965-986. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2024.2352483. eCollection 2024.
10
Promotional language and the adoption of innovative ideas in science.宣传语言和科学创新思想的采用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jun 18;121(25):e2320066121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2320066121. Epub 2024 Jun 11.

本文引用的文献

1
The science of fake news.假新闻的科学。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1094-1096. doi: 10.1126/science.aao2998. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
3
The Changing Bases of Segregation in the United States.美国种族隔离的变化基础。
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2009 Nov 1;626(1). doi: 10.1177/0002716209343558.
5
The case for motivated reasoning.动机性推理的情况。
Psychol Bull. 1990 Nov;108(3):480-98. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验