• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁在乎信息给人的感受?呼吁具备数字影响力素养。

Who Cares How Information Feels? A Call for Digital Influence Literacy.

作者信息

Senft Theresa M

机构信息

Department of Media, Communications, Creative Arts, Language, & Literature (MCCALL), Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Asian Bioeth Rev. 2025 Jun 6;17(3):477-493. doi: 10.1007/s41649-024-00350-0. eCollection 2025 Jul.

DOI:10.1007/s41649-024-00350-0
PMID:40741316
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12304360/
Abstract

This article introduces digital influence literacy, arguing for its inclusion in programs devoted to lessening the spread of health misinformation online. Influence literacy can be roughly understood as the capacity to recognise, analyse, navigate, and emotionally regulate feeling as it is generated, circulated and monetized over digital platforms, alternately experienced by social media users as mood, movement, sentiment, or environmental vibe. Combining insights from communications, social and behavioural psychology, digital design, and trauma studies, influence literacy can be used to better understand events like #FilmYourHospital, where a single rumour on Twitter wound up feeding into a global conspiracy. It can also be used to better appreciate how trends, memes, challenges, and calls for justice move from online spaces to offline ones. After arguing that traditional media literacy's assumptions about the value of emotional communication require substantial re-thinking in the age of platforms, this article lays the groundwork for topics that might be included in discussions on influence, moving from psycho-social theories of feeling to techno-social operations like emotion recognition, sentiment mining, persuasive computing and emotion optimization on platforms. To assist those looking to add influence literacy to classrooms, a teaching framework called the Influence Ecosphere is offered, with discussion topics suggested to help supplement media literacy's traditional focus on rights with a feeling-based ethics of care.

摘要

本文介绍了数字影响力素养,主张将其纳入致力于减少网络健康错误信息传播的项目中。影响力素养大致可理解为一种能力,即能够识别、分析、应对并在情感上调节在数字平台上产生、传播和货币化的情感,社交媒体用户会交替地将其体验为情绪、动态、情感或环境氛围。结合传播学、社会与行为心理学、数字设计以及创伤研究的见解,影响力素养可用于更好地理解诸如#拍摄你的医院这样的事件,在该事件中,推特上的一个谣言最终演变成了一个全球阴谋。它还可用于更好地理解趋势、表情包、挑战以及对正义的呼吁是如何从网络空间转移到线下空间的。在论证了传统媒体素养关于情感传播价值的假设在平台时代需要进行重大反思之后,本文为影响力讨论中可能涵盖的主题奠定了基础,从情感的心理社会理论转向诸如情感识别、情感挖掘、说服性计算和平台上的情感优化等技术社会操作。为帮助那些希望在课堂上引入影响力素养的人,本文提供了一个名为“影响力生态圈”的教学框架,并给出了讨论话题建议,以帮助用基于情感的关怀伦理补充媒体素养传统上对权利的关注。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ea/12304360/4ec25a4d9b38/41649_2024_350_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ea/12304360/4ec25a4d9b38/41649_2024_350_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30ea/12304360/4ec25a4d9b38/41649_2024_350_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Who Cares How Information Feels? A Call for Digital Influence Literacy.谁在乎信息给人的感受?呼吁具备数字影响力素养。
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2025 Jun 6;17(3):477-493. doi: 10.1007/s41649-024-00350-0. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
7
Identifying and Addressing Bullying识别与应对霸凌
8
Developing a role for patients and the public in the implementation of health and social care research evidence into practice: the PIPER study (Pathways to Implementation for Public Engagement in Research) realist evaluation protocol.让患者和公众在将健康与社会护理研究证据转化为实践中发挥作用:PIPER研究(公众参与研究的实施途径)的实在论评价方案。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 14;11(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00728-w.
9
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
A Spectrum of Understanding: A Qualitative Exploration of Autistic Adults' Understandings and Perceptions of Friendship(s).理解的光谱:对自闭症成年人对友谊的理解与认知的质性探索
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):438-450. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0051. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Social media literacy: A conceptual framework.社交媒体素养:一个概念框架。
New Media Soc. 2024 Feb;26(2):941-960. doi: 10.1177/14614448211068530. Epub 2022 Jan 16.
2
Addressing Viral Medical Rumors and False or Misleading Information.应对病毒性医学谣言及虚假或误导性信息。
Ann Intern Med. 2023 Aug;176(8):1113-1120. doi: 10.7326/M23-1218. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
3
Moral distance, AI, and the ethics of care.道德距离、人工智能与关怀伦理
AI Soc. 2023 Mar 23:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00146-023-01642-z.
4
Confronting the evolution and expansion of anti-vaccine activism in the USA in the COVID-19 era.应对新冠疫情时代美国反疫苗行动主义的演变与扩张。
Lancet. 2023 Mar 18;401(10380):967-970. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00136-8. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
5
Violence against healthcare workers is a political problem and a public health issue: a call to action.针对医护人员的暴力行为是一个政治问题和公共卫生问题:行动呼吁。
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Feb 3;33(1):4-5. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac180.
6
Violence against health-care workers in the Philippines.菲律宾针对医护人员的暴力行为。
Lancet. 2022 May 28;399(10340):2012-2013. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00785-1.
7
COVID-19 Misinformation Trends in Australia: Prospective Longitudinal National Survey.澳大利亚的 COVID-19 错误信息趋势:前瞻性纵向全国调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 7;23(1):e23805. doi: 10.2196/23805.
8
COVID-19 exacerbates violence against health workers.新冠疫情加剧了针对医护人员的暴力行为。
Lancet. 2020 Sep 5;396(10252):658. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31858-4.
9
Traumatic stress in the age of COVID-19: A call to close critical gaps and adapt to new realities.新冠疫情时代的创伤后应激:弥合关键差距并适应新现实的呼吁。
Psychol Trauma. 2020 May;12(4):331-335. doi: 10.1037/tra0000592.
10
Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news.科学受众、错误信息和假新闻。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 16;116(16):7662-7669. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805871115. Epub 2019 Jan 14.