University at Buffalo, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Buffalo, New York.
Editorial Board Member, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Arlington, Virginia.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Dec;82(10):6771. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6771.
To compare pharmacotherapy instruction in Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) programs with the 2009 and 2016 American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) pharmacotherapy toolkits. A survey was sent to representatives at US schools and colleges with PharmD programs. The survey consisted of questions pertaining to pharmacotherapy credit-hours, contact time spent for each therapeutic subject area, and pedagogical methods used. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Representatives from 75 of 129 PharmD programs responded (response rate 58%). A median of 23 credit-hours were devoted to required pharmacotherapy. Infectious diseases and cardiology were taught with the most number of contact hours. Lecture was the most popular principal method of instruction delivery but the incorporation of case-based learning was also common. Devoted curricular time to pharmacotherapy is adequate to provide coverage of tier 1 and 2 topics from the ACCP toolkit. PharmD programs should continue to review their pharmacotherapy coursework to adjust topic coverage as needed to incorporate active learning strategies whenever possible.
比较药学博士(PharmD)课程中的药物治疗学教学与 2009 年和 2016 年美国临床药学学院(ACCP)药物治疗学工具包。向美国 PharmD 课程的学校和学院代表发送了一份调查。该调查包括与药物治疗学分、每个治疗主题领域的联系时间以及使用的教学方法相关的问题。使用描述性统计数据对数据进行分析。129 个 PharmD 课程中有 75 个课程的代表做出了回应(回应率为 58%)。规定的药物治疗学需要 23 个学分。传染病学和心脏病学的联系时间最多。讲座是最受欢迎的主要教学方法,但也普遍采用基于案例的学习。药物治疗学的课程时间足以涵盖 ACCP 工具包中的 1 级和 2 级主题。PharmD 课程应继续审查其药物治疗学课程,根据需要调整主题覆盖范围,尽可能采用主动学习策略。