Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 6028566, Japan.
Department of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama 5898511, Japan.
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 7;25(1):107-117. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i1.107.
Rapid urinary trypsinogen-2 dipstick test and levels of urinary trypsinogen-2 and trypsinogen activation peptide (TAP) concentration have been reported as prognostic markers for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.
To reconfirm the validity of all these markers in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis by undertaking a multi-center study in Japan.
Patients with acute abdominal pain were recruited from 17 medical institutions in Japan from April 2009 to December 2012. Urinary and serum samples were collected twice, at enrollment and on the following day for measuring target markers. The diagnosis and severity assessment of acute pancreatitis were assessed based on prognostic factors and computed tomography (CT) Grade of the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare criteria.
A total of 94 patients were enrolled during the study period. The trypsinogen-2 dipstick test was positive in 57 of 78 patients with acute pancreatitis (sensitivity, 73.1%) and in 6 of 16 patients with abdominal pain but without any evidence of acute pancreatitis (specificity, 62.5%). The area under the curve (AUC) score of urinary trypsinogen-2 according to prognostic factors was 0.704, which was highest in all parameter. The AUC scores of urinary trypsinogen-2 and TAP according to CT Grade were 0.701 and 0.692, respectively, which shows higher than other pancreatic enzymes. The levels of urinary trypsinogen-2 and TAP were significantly higher in patients with extended extra-pancreatic inflammation as evaluated by CT Grade.
We reconfirmed urinary trypsinogen-2 dipstick test is useful as a marker for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Urinary trypsinogen-2 and TAP may be considered as useful markers to determine extra-pancreatic inflammation in acute pancreatitis.
尿液胰蛋白酶原-2 快速检测以及尿液胰蛋白酶原-2 和胰蛋白酶原激活肽(TAP)浓度已被报道为急性胰腺炎的诊断预后标志物。
通过在日本进行多中心研究,重新确认所有这些标志物在诊断急性胰腺炎中的有效性。
2009 年 4 月至 2012 年 12 月,从日本的 17 家医疗机构招募有急性腹痛的患者。在入组时和次日采集尿液和血清样本,以测量目标标志物。根据预后因素和日本厚生劳动省的 CT 分级,对急性胰腺炎的诊断和严重程度进行评估。
研究期间共纳入 94 例患者。胰蛋白酶原-2 快速检测在 78 例急性胰腺炎患者中的 57 例(敏感性,73.1%)和 16 例腹痛但无任何急性胰腺炎证据的患者中的 6 例(特异性,62.5%)中呈阳性。根据预后因素的尿液胰蛋白酶原-2 的曲线下面积(AUC)评分为 0.704,在所有参数中最高。根据 CT 分级的尿液胰蛋白酶原-2 和 TAP 的 AUC 评分为 0.701 和 0.692,分别显示高于其他胰腺酶。根据 CT 分级评估,尿液胰蛋白酶原-2 和 TAP 的水平在胰腺外炎症扩展的患者中明显升高。
我们重新确认尿液胰蛋白酶原-2 快速检测作为急性胰腺炎诊断标志物是有用的。尿液胰蛋白酶原-2 和 TAP 可能被认为是确定急性胰腺炎胰腺外炎症的有用标志物。