• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管活性药物在脓毒性休克中的应用:超越一线推荐。

Vasoactive Agent Use in Septic Shock: Beyond First-Line Recommendations.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Department of Pharmacy, Shirley Ryan Ability Lab, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2019 Mar;39(3):369-381. doi: 10.1002/phar.2220. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1002/phar.2220
PMID:30644586
Abstract

Septic shock is a life-threatening disorder associated with high mortality rates requiring rapid identification and intervention. Vasoactive agents are often required to maintain goal hemodynamics and preserve tissue perfusion. However, guidance regarding the proper administration of adjunct agents for the management of septic shock is limited in patients who are refractory to norepinephrine. This review summarizes vasopressor agents and describes the nuanced application of these agents in patients with septic shock, specifically focusing on clinical scenarios with limited guidance including patients who are nonresponsive to first-line agents and individuals with mixed shock states, tachyarrhythmias, obesity, valvular abnormalities, or other comorbid conditions.

摘要

感染性休克是一种危及生命的疾病,死亡率高,需要快速识别和干预。通常需要使用血管活性药物来维持目标血流动力学并维持组织灌注。然而,对于去甲肾上腺素抵抗的患者,关于辅助药物管理感染性休克的正确给药的指导是有限的。本综述总结了血管加压药,并描述了这些药物在感染性休克患者中的应用,特别是重点关注指导有限的临床情况,包括对一线药物无反应的患者和存在混合性休克状态、心动过速性心律失常、肥胖症、瓣膜异常或其他合并症的个体。

相似文献

1
Vasoactive Agent Use in Septic Shock: Beyond First-Line Recommendations.血管活性药物在脓毒性休克中的应用:超越一线推荐。
Pharmacotherapy. 2019 Mar;39(3):369-381. doi: 10.1002/phar.2220. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
2
Hemodynamic Instability Secondary to Vasopressin Withdrawal in Septic Shock.感染性休克中血管加压素停药引起的血流动力学不稳定。
J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):761-765. doi: 10.1177/0885066617716396. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
3
A comparison of initial monotherapy with norepinephrine versus vasopressin for resuscitation in septic shock.比较脓毒性休克时以去甲肾上腺素与血管加压素进行初始单一疗法的复苏效果。
Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Mar;47(3):301-10. doi: 10.1345/aph.1R442. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
4
Phenylephrine versus norepinephrine for initial hemodynamic support of patients with septic shock: a randomized, controlled trial.去氧肾上腺素与去甲肾上腺素用于感染性休克患者初始血流动力学支持的随机对照试验
Crit Care. 2008;12(6):R143. doi: 10.1186/cc7121. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
5
Hypotension Risk Based on Vasoactive Agent Discontinuation Order in Patients in the Recovery Phase of Septic Shock.基于血管活性药物停用医嘱的脓毒性休克复苏期患者低血压风险
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Mar;38(3):319-326. doi: 10.1002/phar.2082. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
6
Dear vasopressin, where is your place in septic shock?亲爱的血管加压素,你在感染性休克中扮演着怎样的角色?
Crit Care. 2005 Apr;9(2):134-5. doi: 10.1186/cc2996. Epub 2004 Nov 15.
7
Comparative Effectiveness of Second Vasoactive Agents in Septic Shock Refractory to Norepinephrine.去甲肾上腺素难治性感染性休克中第二种血管活性药物的比较疗效
J Intensive Care Med. 2017 Aug;32(7):451-459. doi: 10.1177/0885066616647941. Epub 2016 May 6.
8
Comparison of equipressor doses of norepinephrine, epinephrine, and phenylephrine on septic myocardial dysfunction.比较去甲肾上腺素、肾上腺素和苯肾上腺素的等压器剂量对脓毒性心肌功能障碍的影响。
Anesthesiology. 2012 May;116(5):1083-91. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31824f9669.
9
Vasoactive drugs for vasodilatory shock in ICU.重症监护病房中用于血管舒张性休克的血管活性药物。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009 Oct;15(5):398-402. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32832e96ef.
10
Comparison of first-line and second-line terlipressin versus sole norepinephrine in fulminant ovine septic shock.比较一线和二线特利加压素与单纯去甲肾上腺素治疗暴发性绵羊感染性休克的疗效。
Sci Rep. 2018 May 8;8(1):7105. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25570-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Angiotensin II as a Vasopressor for Perioperative Hypotension in Solid Organ Transplant.血管紧张素II作为实体器官移植围手术期低血压的血管加压药
Biomedicines. 2024 Aug 9;12(8):1817. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12081817.
2
Clinical Use of Adrenergic Receptor Ligands in Acute Care Settings.在急性护理环境中使用肾上腺素能受体配体的临床应用
Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2024;285:617-637. doi: 10.1007/164_2023_705.
3
Echocardiographic profiles and hemodynamic response after vasopressin initiation in septic shock: A cross-sectional study.超声心动图特征与血管加压素起始后对感染性休克血流动力学的反应:一项横断面研究。
J Crit Care. 2023 Aug;76:154298. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154298. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
4
α-Adrenergic Receptors: Insights into Potential Therapeutic Opportunities for COVID-19, Heart Failure, and Alzheimer's Disease.α-肾上腺素能受体:COVID-19、心力衰竭和阿尔茨海默病潜在治疗机会的新见解。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Feb 20;24(4):4188. doi: 10.3390/ijms24044188.
5
Timing of vasoactive agents and corticosteroid initiation in septic shock.感染性休克中血管活性药物和皮质类固醇起始使用的时机。
Ann Intensive Care. 2022 May 30;12(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-01021-9.
6
The selectivity of α-adrenoceptor agonists for the human α1A, α1B, and α1D-adrenoceptors.α-肾上腺素受体激动剂对人 α1A、α1B 和 α1D-肾上腺素受体的选择性。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2021 Aug;9(4):e00799. doi: 10.1002/prp2.799.
7
Angiotensin II-mediated improvement of renal mitochondrial function via the AMPK/PGC-1α/NRF-2 pathway is superior to norepinephrine in a rat model of septic shock associated with acute renal injury.在伴有急性肾损伤的脓毒性休克大鼠模型中,血管紧张素II通过AMPK/PGC-1α/NRF-2途径介导的肾线粒体功能改善作用优于去甲肾上腺素。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Mar;9(6):481. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-621.
8
Hemodynamic Response to Vasopressin Dosage of 0.03 Units/Min vs. 0.04 Units/Min in Patients With Septic Shock.血管加压素剂量为 0.03 单位/分钟与 0.04 单位/分钟对感染性休克患者血流动力学反应的比较。
J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):92-99. doi: 10.1177/0885066620977181. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
9
Polymers and Plastics Modified Electrodes for Biosensors: A Review.聚合物和塑料修饰电极在生物传感器中的应用:综述。
Molecules. 2020 May 24;25(10):2446. doi: 10.3390/molecules25102446.