• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术室内外不当手术程序评估:来自美国退伍军人健康管理局医疗中心的随访研究。

Assessment of Incorrect Surgical Procedures Within and Outside the Operating Room: A Follow-up Study From US Veterans Health Administration Medical Centers.

机构信息

National Center for Patient Safety, Veterans Health Administration, White River Junction, Vermont.

Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e185147. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5147.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5147
PMID:30646381
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6324368/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Reducing wrong-site surgery is fundamental to safe, high-quality care. This is a follow-up study examining 8 years of reported surgical adverse events and root causes in the nation's largest integrated health care system.

OBJECTIVES

To provide a follow-up description of incorrect surgical procedures reported from 2010 to 2017 from US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) medical centers, compared with the previous studies of 2001 to 2006 and 2006 to 2009, and to recommend actions for future prevention of such events.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This quality improvement study describes patient safety adverse events and close calls reported from 86 VHA medical centers from the approximately 130 VHA facilities with a surgical program. The surgical procedures and programs vary in size and complexity from small rural centers to large, complex urban facilities. Procedures occurring between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017, were included. Data analysis took place in 2018.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The categories of incorrect procedure types were wrong patient, side, site (including wrong-level spine), procedure, or implant. Events included those in or out of the operating room, adverse events or close calls, surgical specialty, and harm. These results were compared with the previous studies of VHA-reported wrong-site surgery (2001-2006 and 2006-2009).

RESULTS

Our review produced 483 reports (277 adverse events and 206 close calls). The rate of in-operating room (in-OR) reported adverse events with harm has continued to trend downward from 1.74 to 0.47 reported adverse events with harm per 100 000 procedures between 2000 and 2017 based on 6 591 986 in-OR procedures. When in-OR events were examined by discipline as a rate, dentistry had 1.54, neurosurgery had 1.53, and ophthalmology had 1.06 reported in-OR adverse events per 10 000 cases. The overall VHA in-OR rate for adverse events during 2010 to 2017 was 0.53 per 10 000 procedures based on 3 234 514 in-OR procedures. The most common root cause for adverse events was related to issues in performing a comprehensive time-out (28.4%). In these cases, the time-out either was conducted incorrectly or was incomplete in some way.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Over the period studied, the VHA identified a decrease in the rate of reported adverse events in the OR associated with harm and continued reporting of adverse event close calls. Organizational efforts continue to examine root cause analysis reports, promulgate lessons learned, and enhance policy to promote a culture and behavior that minimizes events and is transparent in reporting occurrences.

摘要

重要性

降低错误部位手术是安全、高质量护理的基础。这是一项后续研究,调查了全国最大的综合性医疗保健系统中 8 年来报告的手术不良事件和根本原因。

目的

提供 2010 年至 2017 年期间,从美国退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)医疗中心报告的错误手术程序的后续描述,与之前 2001 年至 2006 年和 2006 年至 2009 年的研究进行比较,并为未来预防此类事件提出建议。

设计、设置和参与者:这项质量改进研究描述了 86 个 VHA 医疗中心从大约 130 个具有手术项目的 VHA 设施中报告的患者安全不良事件和接近事件。手术程序和程序的规模和复杂性从小型农村中心到大型复杂的城市设施各不相同。包括 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间发生的手术。数据分析于 2018 年进行。

主要结果和措施

错误程序类型的类别包括错误患者、侧位、部位(包括错误脊柱水平)、程序或植入物。事件包括手术室内外、不良事件或接近事件、手术专业和伤害。这些结果与之前 VHA 报告的错误部位手术(2001-2006 年和 2006-2009 年)研究进行了比较。

结果

我们的审查产生了 483 份报告(277 份不良事件和 206 份接近事件)。根据 2000 年至 2017 年期间 6591986 例手术中,手术室内报告的不良事件与伤害的发生率从 1.74 下降到 0.47 每 100000 例手术。当以学科为指标检查手术室内事件的发生率时,牙科为 1.54,神经外科为 1.53,眼科为 1.06,每 10000 例手术中有手术室内不良事件。根据 2010 年至 2017 年期间的 3234514 例手术室内手术,VHA 手术室内不良事件的总发生率为每 10000 例手术 0.53。不良事件的最常见根本原因与全面暂停期间的问题有关(28.4%)。在这些情况下,暂停要么不正确地进行,要么以某种方式不完整。

结论和相关性

在研究期间,VHA 确定了与伤害相关的手术室内报告不良事件的发生率下降,并继续报告不良事件的接近事件。组织继续审查根本原因分析报告,宣传经验教训,并加强政策,以促进一种文化和行为,最大限度地减少事件,并在报告发生时保持透明。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d75/6324368/3a785a8a2fb9/jamanetwopen-1-e185147-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d75/6324368/bdfc2f5e30d1/jamanetwopen-1-e185147-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d75/6324368/3a785a8a2fb9/jamanetwopen-1-e185147-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d75/6324368/bdfc2f5e30d1/jamanetwopen-1-e185147-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d75/6324368/3a785a8a2fb9/jamanetwopen-1-e185147-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of Incorrect Surgical Procedures Within and Outside the Operating Room: A Follow-up Study From US Veterans Health Administration Medical Centers.手术室内外不当手术程序评估:来自美国退伍军人健康管理局医疗中心的随访研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e185147. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5147.
2
Incorrect surgical procedures within and outside of the operating room.手术室内外不正确的外科手术程序。
Arch Surg. 2009 Nov;144(11):1028-34. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.126.
3
Incorrect surgical procedures within and outside of the operating room: a follow-up report.手术室内外的错误手术操作:一份随访报告。
Arch Surg. 2011 Nov;146(11):1235-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.171. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
4
Examining Wrong Eye Implant Adverse Events in the Veterans Health Administration With a Focus on Prevention: A Preliminary Report.审视退伍军人健康管理局中错误眼植入不良事件并着重于预防:一份初步报告。
J Patient Saf. 2018 Mar;14(1):49-53. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000170.
5
Wrong Site Spine Surgery in the Veterans Administration.退伍军人事务部的脊柱手术误切部位事件
Clin Spine Surg. 2019 Dec;32(10):454-457. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000771.
6
Standardizing Patient Safety Event Reporting between Care Delivered or Purchased by the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).规范由退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)提供或购买的医疗服务中的患者安全事件报告。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024 Apr;50(4):247-259. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.12.001. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
7
Root Cause Analysis of Oncology Adverse Events in the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人健康管理局肿瘤不良事件根本原因分析。
J Oncol Pract. 2018 Sep;14(9):e579-e590. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00159. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
8
Sharing lessons learned to prevent incorrect surgery.分享经验教训以防止手术失误。
Am Surg. 2012 Nov;78(11):1276-80.
9
Investigation of urology intraoperative events leading to root cause analysis at national VA medical centers.在国家退伍军人事务部医疗中心对导致根本原因分析的泌尿外科术中事件进行调查。
Can J Urol. 2023 Apr;30(2):11467-11472.
10
Errors upstream and downstream to the Universal Protocol associated with wrong surgery events in the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人健康管理局中与错误手术事件相关的通用协议上下游的错误。
Am J Surg. 2015 Jul;210(1):6-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.10.030. Epub 2015 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of management in providing safe eye care delivery.管理在提供安全的眼科护理服务中的作用。
Community Eye Health. 2021;34(111):2-5. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
2
Rates of Serious Surgical Errors in California and Plans to Prevent Recurrence.加利福尼亚州严重手术失误率及预防复发计划。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e217058. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7058.

本文引用的文献

1
Contributory factors in surgical incidents as delineated by a confidential reporting system.由一个保密报告系统所描述的手术事故中的促成因素。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 May;100(5):401-405. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0025. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
2
Wrong-Site Surgery.手术部位错误
JAMA. 2017 Nov 28;318(20):2033-2034. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17177.
3
Wrong-Site Surgery in California, 2007-2014.2007 - 2014年加利福尼亚州的手术部位错误事件
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jul;157(1):48-52. doi: 10.1177/0194599817693226. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
4
The risk of surgical never events.手术严重不良事件的风险。
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2016 Feb;77(2):64-5. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2016.77.2.64.
5
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.SQUIRE 2.0(卓越质量改进报告标准):通过详细的共识过程制定的修订版出版指南。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):986-992. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
6
Wrong-Site Surgery, Retained Surgical Items, and Surgical Fires : A Systematic Review of Surgical Never Events.错误部位手术、遗留手术器械和手术火灾:手术无预警事件的系统回顾。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Aug;150(8):796-805. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.0301.
7
Examining Wrong Eye Implant Adverse Events in the Veterans Health Administration With a Focus on Prevention: A Preliminary Report.审视退伍军人健康管理局中错误眼植入不良事件并着重于预防:一份初步报告。
J Patient Saf. 2018 Mar;14(1):49-53. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000170.
8
Sharing lessons learned to prevent incorrect surgery.分享经验教训以防止手术失误。
Am Surg. 2012 Nov;78(11):1276-80.
9
Incorrect surgical procedures within and outside of the operating room: a follow-up report.手术室内外的错误手术操作:一份随访报告。
Arch Surg. 2011 Nov;146(11):1235-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.171. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
10
Avoiding wrong site surgery: a systematic review.避免错误部位手术:系统评价。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 20;35(9 Suppl):S28-36. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d833ac.