• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

股骨扭转角的正常参考数据。

Normative data on femoral version.

作者信息

Litrenta Jody M, Domb Benjamin G

机构信息

American Hip Institute, 1010 Executive Court, Suite 250, Westmont, IL, USA.

NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Hip Preserv Surg. 2018 Dec 24;5(4):410-424. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hny048. eCollection 2018 Dec.

DOI:10.1093/jhps/hny048
PMID:30647933
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6328757/
Abstract

Femoral version is reported to vary in relation to age, gender and other patient-specific factors. Differences in femoral version are suspected to contribute to the development of hip pathology. However, normative data on pathologic hips has never been reported. To evaluate the femoral version in a large population of patients with symptomatic hip pathology treated with arthroscopy and report differences within this group based on age, gender, bony morphology and other hip-related factors. A prospectively gathered database of 1449 hips was reviewed. All patients underwent pre-operative MRI with measure of femoral version. The average femoral version of the entire population was 8.4+ 9.2°, range -23 to 63. There no statistically significant differences encountered based on age, gender, bony morphology or other hip-related factors. Across all groups, there was wide variation in the femoral version present. Among younger patients, there was trend to have a greater proportion of retroversion. Significant variation in femoral version exists in patients with symptomatic hip pathology. Although the geometry of the proximal femur is commonly described as anteverted, relative retroversion is also frequently encountered.

摘要

据报道,股骨扭转角会因年龄、性别和其他患者特定因素而有所不同。股骨扭转角的差异被怀疑与髋关节病变的发生有关。然而,从未有过关于病理性髋关节的规范数据报道。为了评估大量接受关节镜治疗的有症状髋关节病变患者的股骨扭转角,并根据年龄、性别、骨骼形态和其他与髋关节相关的因素报告该组内的差异。回顾了一个前瞻性收集的包含1449个髋关节的数据库。所有患者术前均接受了股骨扭转角测量的MRI检查。整个人群的平均股骨扭转角为8.4±9.2°,范围为-23°至63°。基于年龄、性别、骨骼形态或其他与髋关节相关的因素,未发现统计学上的显著差异。在所有组中,股骨扭转角存在广泛差异。在年轻患者中,存在后倾比例更高的趋势。有症状髋关节病变患者的股骨扭转角存在显著差异。尽管近端股骨的几何形状通常被描述为前倾,但相对后倾也经常出现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/74b57dcff8b2/hny048f30.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/8183dd5bd9d9/hny048f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/827ccdc1aca8/hny048f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/6d60c4c1c92a/hny048f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/8306e7571d73/hny048f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/c54cc3bbbb7b/hny048f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/87815b7efb3d/hny048f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/c19c9655321a/hny048f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/8cb7580de9bd/hny048f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/8625f93298bf/hny048f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/a3711af77b04/hny048f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/937a786e99fa/hny048f11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/7f5b960f07e1/hny048f12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/065589fbc035/hny048f13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/af116710ebb8/hny048f14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/a0cfc28f5c04/hny048f15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/24e4237d943f/hny048f16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/303e94c62ef1/hny048f17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/e1c298ed38b8/hny048f18.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/5f6a9c89c21a/hny048f19.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/08e93e99945b/hny048f20.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/029049e8abc1/hny048f21.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/43cdbca0a265/hny048f22.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/2dd73c3b7bee/hny048f23.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/8c4fa034cd9a/hny048f24.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/7f5cf500c071/hny048f25.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/d7da111a5ee2/hny048f26.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/4c10eb7b7e73/hny048f27.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/2ada8c8e51b2/hny048f28.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/eb1b922825c4/hny048f29.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/74b57dcff8b2/hny048f30.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/8183dd5bd9d9/hny048f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/827ccdc1aca8/hny048f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/6d60c4c1c92a/hny048f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/8306e7571d73/hny048f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/c54cc3bbbb7b/hny048f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/87815b7efb3d/hny048f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/c19c9655321a/hny048f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/8cb7580de9bd/hny048f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/8625f93298bf/hny048f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/a3711af77b04/hny048f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/937a786e99fa/hny048f11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/7f5b960f07e1/hny048f12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/065589fbc035/hny048f13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/af116710ebb8/hny048f14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/a0cfc28f5c04/hny048f15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/24e4237d943f/hny048f16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/303e94c62ef1/hny048f17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/e1c298ed38b8/hny048f18.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/5f6a9c89c21a/hny048f19.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/08e93e99945b/hny048f20.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/029049e8abc1/hny048f21.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/43cdbca0a265/hny048f22.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/2dd73c3b7bee/hny048f23.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/8c4fa034cd9a/hny048f24.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/7f5cf500c071/hny048f25.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/d7da111a5ee2/hny048f26.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/4c10eb7b7e73/hny048f27.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/2ada8c8e51b2/hny048f28.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/eb1b922825c4/hny048f29.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de6/6328757/74b57dcff8b2/hny048f30.jpg

相似文献

1
Normative data on femoral version.股骨扭转角的正常参考数据。
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2018 Dec 24;5(4):410-424. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hny048. eCollection 2018 Dec.
2
Femoral Morphology in the Dysplastic Hip: Three-dimensional Characterizations With CT.发育性髋关节异常中的股骨形态学:CT三维特征分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1045-1054. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5119-2.
3
Effect of femoral anteversion on clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopy.股骨前倾对髋关节镜检查后临床结果的影响。
Arthroscopy. 2015 Jan;31(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
4
Relationship between proximal femoral and acetabular alignment in normal hip joints using 3-dimensional computed tomography.使用三维计算机断层扫描技术研究正常髋关节中股骨近端和髋臼的对准关系。
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):367-75. doi: 10.1177/0363546511424390. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
5
Does Femoral Retroversion Adversely Affect Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? A Midterm Analysis.股骨后旋对线不良是否会对髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征的疗效产生不利影响?中期分析。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Nov;35(11):3035-3046. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.03.046. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
6
The effect of femoral and acetabular version on clinical outcomes after arthroscopic femoroacetabular impingement surgery.股骨和髋臼旋转角度对关节镜下股骨髋臼撞击症手术后临床疗效的影响。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Apr 1;97(7):537-43. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00266.
7
Femoroacetabular Impingement Patients With Decreased Femoral Version Have Different Impingement Locations and Intra- and Extraarticular Anterior Subspine FAI on 3D-CT-Based Impingement Simulation: Implications for Hip Arthroscopy.基于三维 CT 的撞击模拟中,股骨颈前倾角减小的髋关节撞击症患者撞击位置和关节内、外前支突撞击点不同:对髋关节镜手术的影响。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Nov;47(13):3120-3132. doi: 10.1177/0363546519873666. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
8
Acetabular Retroversion and Decreased Posterior Coverage Are Associated With Sports-related Posterior Hip Dislocation in Adolescents.髋臼后倾和后覆盖减少与青少年运动相关性髋关节后脱位有关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):1101-1108. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000514.
9
Prevalence of Femoral and Acetabular Version Abnormalities in Patients With Symptomatic Hip Disease: A Controlled Study of 538 Hips.髋关节疾病症状患者的股骨和髋臼版本异常的流行率:一项对 538 髋的对照研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jan;46(1):122-134. doi: 10.1177/0363546517726983. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
10
Relationship between femoral anteversion and findings in hips with femoroacetabular impingement.股骨前倾与股骨髋臼撞击症髋关节表现之间的关系
Orthopedics. 2013 Mar;36(3):e293-300. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130222-17.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiographic evaluation of the painful adolescent and young adult hip.疼痛性青少年及青年成人髋关节的影像学评估
J Pediatr Soc North Am. 2024 Apr 3;7:100039. doi: 10.1016/j.jposna.2024.100039. eCollection 2024 May.
2
The lesser trochanter profile is an accurate and reliable measure of femoral rotation for intramedullary nailing.小转子轮廓是髓内钉固定时测量股骨旋转的一种准确且可靠的方法。
SICOT J. 2024;10:36. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2024036. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
3
How useful are indirect radiographic measurements of hip instability in borderline hip dysplasia? An MRI-based comparison to a healthy cohort.

本文引用的文献

1
Is there a relationship between psoas impingement and increased trochanteric retroversion?腰大肌撞击与股骨大转子后倾增加之间存在关联吗?
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2015 Jul;2(2):164-9. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnv024. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
2
The effect of femoral and acetabular version on clinical outcomes after arthroscopic femoroacetabular impingement surgery.股骨和髋臼旋转角度对关节镜下股骨髋臼撞击症手术后临床疗效的影响。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Apr 1;97(7):537-43. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00266.
3
Patient-centered outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement and labral tears are not different in patients with normal, high, or low femoral version.
间接放射影像学测量在髋关节发育不良边缘病例中对髋关节不稳定的作用有多大?与健康队列的 MRI 比较。
Int Orthop. 2024 Aug;48(8):2007-2015. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06202-8. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
4
Correlation of femoral version measurements between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging studies in patients presenting with a femoroacetabular impingement-related complaint.股骨髋臼撞击症相关主诉患者的计算机断层扫描与磁共振成像研究中股骨扭转角测量值的相关性
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2022 Jul 27;9(4):219-224. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnac036. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Patellofemoral joint load and knee abduction/adduction moment are sensitive to variations in femoral version and individual muscle forces.髌股关节负荷和膝关节内收/外展力矩对股骨扭转和个体肌肉力量的变化敏感。
J Orthop Res. 2023 Mar;41(3):570-582. doi: 10.1002/jor.25396. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
6
Over one third of patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement display femoral or acetabular version abnormalities.超过三分之一的有症状的股骨髋臼撞击症患者存在股骨或髋臼的倾斜异常。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Sep;29(9):2825-2836. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06643-3. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
7
Teamwork in hip preservation: the ISHA 2019 Annual Scientific Meeting.髋关节保髋治疗中的团队协作:国际髋关节镜学会(ISHA)2019年年度科学会议
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2020 Oct 9;7(Suppl 1):2-21. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnaa037. eCollection 2020 Oct.
对于股骨髋臼撞击症和髋臼盂唇撕裂行髋关节镜检查后,正常、高位或低位股骨扭转角患者以患者为中心的结局并无差异。
Arthroscopy. 2015 Mar;31(3):454-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
4
Prevalence and characteristics of cam-type femoroacetabular deformity in 100 hips with symptomatic acetabular dysplasia: a case control study.100例有症状髋臼发育不良患者髋关节凸轮型股骨髋臼畸形的患病率及特征:一项病例对照研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2014 Oct 10;9:93. doi: 10.1186/s13018-014-0093-4.
5
Effect of femoral anteversion on clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopy.股骨前倾对髋关节镜检查后临床结果的影响。
Arthroscopy. 2015 Jan;31(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
6
Relationship between femoral anteversion and findings in hips with femoroacetabular impingement.股骨前倾与股骨髋臼撞击症髋关节表现之间的关系
Orthopedics. 2013 Mar;36(3):e293-300. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130222-17.
7
Sex differences of hip morphology in young adults with hip pain and labral tears.年轻人髋关节疼痛伴盂唇撕裂的髋关节形态性别差异。
Arthroscopy. 2013 Jan;29(1):54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.07.008. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
8
Femoral version of the general population: does "normal" vary by gender or ethnicity?一般人群的股骨倾斜度:“正常”是否因性别或种族而异?
J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Jun;27(6):308-11. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182693fdd.
9
Femoral anteversion in the hip: comparison of measurement by computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and physical examination.髋关节股骨前倾角:计算机断层扫描、磁共振成像和体格检查测量的比较。
Arthroscopy. 2012 May;28(5):619-27. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.10.021. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
10
Femoral anteversion in developmental dysplasia of the hip.发育性髋关节发育不良中的股骨前倾
J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Dec;29(8):885-8. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181c1e961.