Jenkins K Sean, Steel Jason C, Layton Christopher J
Faculty of Medicine, Greenslopes Clinical School, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
LVF Ophthalmology Research Centre, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
J Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec 13;2018:8479850. doi: 10.1155/2018/8479850. eCollection 2018.
Diabetic retinal neuropathy refers to retinal neural tissue damage occurring before the structural retinal changes of diabetic retinopathy and fulfils many of the criteria for causality for the subsequent vasculopathy. Developing reliable means of measuring neuronal damage in diabetes may be important in efforts to prevent retinopathy of a clinically significant and irreversible stage. This study aimed at systematically assessing current clinical measurements of diabetic retinal neuropathy so that future studies may utilise a consensual battery of tests in studying this poorly understood disease state between a healthy retina and one that is retinopathic.
A systematic search of the medical literature since 1984 was performed on PUBMED and EMBASE, and the evidence supporting each identified method as an indicator for clinically important diabetic retinal neuropathy was graded relatively as compelling, medium, or weak according to criteria assessing its relationship to subsequent diabetic retinopathy, quality of supporting studies, and published reproducibility.
The systematic search yielded 6432 results. Subsequent assessment by two independent investigators identified 601 multiple subject studies in humans assessing clinical aspects of the retinal structure, function, or psychophysics in the prediabetic retina. The 933 separate instances of clinical methods assessed as being supported by relatively "compelling" evidence included colour vision changes, flash ERG b-wave latency, flash multifocal b-wave latency, scotopic b-wave and oscillatory potentials in ERG, and contrast sensitivity.
The results showed moderately poor quality of extant evidence and indicate the best clinical methods for assessing diabetic retinal neuropathy that remain to be confirmed. This is the first systematic assessment of the medical literature aiming at assessing the breadth and validity of these methods and represents an early step in identifying and developing clinical endpoints for use in trials designed to identify at-risk patients or prevent diabetic retinopathy.
糖尿病性视网膜神经病变是指在糖尿病性视网膜病变的视网膜结构改变之前发生的视网膜神经组织损伤,并且满足许多后续血管病变的因果关系标准。开发可靠的糖尿病神经损伤测量方法对于预防具有临床意义且不可逆转阶段的视网膜病变可能至关重要。本研究旨在系统评估糖尿病性视网膜神经病变的当前临床测量方法,以便未来的研究在研究这种健康视网膜与患视网膜病变的视网膜之间了解甚少的疾病状态时,可以使用一套达成共识的测试方法。
在PUBMED和EMBASE上对自1984年以来的医学文献进行系统检索,并根据评估其与后续糖尿病性视网膜病变的关系、支持性研究的质量以及已发表的可重复性的标准,将支持每种已识别方法作为临床重要糖尿病性视网膜神经病变指标的证据相对分级为令人信服、中等或薄弱。
系统检索产生了6432条结果。随后由两名独立研究人员进行的评估确定了601项针对人类的多受试者研究,这些研究评估了糖尿病前期视网膜的视网膜结构、功能或心理物理学的临床方面。被评估为有相对“令人信服”证据支持的933个临床方法单独实例包括色觉变化、闪光视网膜电图b波潜伏期、闪光多焦b波潜伏期、视网膜电图中的暗视b波和振荡电位以及对比敏感度。
结果显示现有证据质量中等较差,并表明评估糖尿病性视网膜神经病变的最佳临床方法仍有待证实。这是首次针对评估这些方法的广度和有效性对医学文献进行系统评估,代表了识别和开发用于识别高危患者或预防糖尿病性视网膜病变的试验中使用的临床终点的早期步骤。