Samantaray Dharma Jivan, Trehan Meena, Chowdhry Vivek, Reedy Satish
Department of Cardiac Anaesthesiology, Care Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Department of Anaesthesiology, Apollo Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Ann Card Anaesth. 2019 Jan-Mar;22(1):35-40. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_215_17.
Regional anesthesia may attenuate adverse physiological stress responses associated with cardiothoracic surgery. In this study, hemodynamic stress response at the different time of surgical stimuli was compared between patients receiving general anesthesia (GA) along with caudal epidural analgesia with GA with intravenous analgesia in pediatric population undergoing open-heart surgery.
This study aims to compare the hemodynamic response at the different time of surgical stimuli and postoperative pain score, in pediatric patients undergoing open-heart procedures.
We designed a prospective randomized controlled trial to study hemodynamic effects between Group I and Group II. Fifty patients were randomly allocated equally into Group I (GA + caudal epidural) and Group II (GA + intravenous analgesia) by sealed envelope technique.
After obtaining approval from Institutional Ethical Committee, this prospective study was conducted in 50 American Society of Anesthesiologist Classes II and III pediatric patients aged between 1 and 12 years posted for cardiac surgery in our institution.
ANOVA, two-way ANOVA, and Student's test.
The heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean blood pressure variations were compared between Groups I and II at different time intervals. The variations were found to be significantly higher at the time of skin incision and 2 min after skin incision in Group II as compared to Group I. Pain score was compared between the groups and was found to be significantly lower with Group I (2.5 ± 1.2) as compared to Group II (4.6 ± 1.7), P = (0.004).
Caudal analgesia with GA (Group I) was found to have better hemodynamic control and significantly better postoperative pain relief in the first 24 h after awakening.
区域麻醉可能减轻与心胸外科手术相关的不良生理应激反应。在本研究中,比较了接受全身麻醉(GA)联合骶管硬膜外镇痛与GA联合静脉镇痛的小儿心脏直视手术患者在手术刺激不同时间的血流动力学应激反应。
本研究旨在比较小儿心脏手术患者在手术刺激不同时间的血流动力学反应及术后疼痛评分。
我们设计了一项前瞻性随机对照试验,以研究I组和II组之间的血流动力学效应。采用密封信封技术将50例患者随机均分为I组(GA + 骶管硬膜外)和II组(GA + 静脉镇痛)。
获得机构伦理委员会批准后,本前瞻性研究在我院50例年龄在1至12岁、美国麻醉医师协会分级为II级和III级的小儿心脏手术患者中进行。
方差分析、双向方差分析和学生检验。
比较了I组和II组在不同时间间隔的心率、收缩压、舒张压和平均血压变化。发现II组在皮肤切开时和皮肤切开后2分钟的变化明显高于I组。比较了两组之间的疼痛评分,发现I组(2.5±1.2)明显低于II组(4.6±1.7),P =(0.004)。
GA联合骶管镇痛(I组)在血流动力学控制方面更好,且在苏醒后24小时内术后疼痛缓解明显更好。