• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of caudal morphine and buprenorphine for post-operative analgesia in children.

作者信息

Girotra S, Kumar S, Rajendran K M

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated LNJPN Hospital, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1993 Jul;10(4):309-12.

PMID:8330602
Abstract

Sixty five children aged from 1-10 years who underwent herniotomy, cystolithotomy or orchidopexy received either buprenorphine 4 micrograms kg-1 (n = 33) or morphine 50 micrograms kg-1 (n = 32) by the caudal epidural route; each thus received 0.5 ml kg-1 body weight. General anaesthesia was given for surgery. Post-operative pain and behaviour were assessed by an independent observer at 1, 4, 8, 16 and 24 h post-operatively. Caudal morphine and buprenorphine were equally effective for post-operative analgesia in children, but buprenorphine was better because of its longer duration of action and lower incidence of side effects.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of caudal morphine and buprenorphine for post-operative analgesia in children.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1993 Jul;10(4):309-12.
2
Post-operative pain relief in children following caudal bupivacaine and buprenorphine--a comparative study.儿童尾骶部注射布比卡因和丁丙诺啡术后镇痛的比较研究
J Postgrad Med. 1994 Apr-Jun;40(2):61-4.
3
Comparison of buprenorphine with morphine in the treatment of postoperative pain in children.
Anesth Analg. 1988 Mar;67(3):233-9.
4
Comparison of bupivacaine plus buprenorphine with bupivacaine alone by caudal blockade for post-operative pain relief after hip and knee arthroplasty.布比卡因加丁丙诺啡与单纯布比卡因经骶管阻滞用于髋膝关节置换术后镇痛的比较。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1995 Sep;12(5):471-6.
5
[Epidural opioids for post-operative pain control in pediatric patients with cerebral palsy].[硬膜外使用阿片类药物用于脑瘫患儿术后疼痛控制]
Masui. 1993 May;42(5):664-8.
6
Intrathecal morphine provides effective and safe analgesia in children after cardiac surgery.鞘内注射吗啡可为儿童心脏手术后提供有效且安全的镇痛效果。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004 Aug;48(7):875-82. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-5172.2004.00449.x.
7
Comparison of caudal bupivacaine, bupivacaine-morphine and bupivacaine-midazolam mixtures for post-operative analgesia in children.儿童术后镇痛中尾侧布比卡因、布比卡因 - 吗啡及布比卡因 - 咪达唑仑混合液的比较
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1998 Mar;15(2):161-5.
8
Effects of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with buprenorphine and morphine alone and in combination during the first 12 postoperative hours: a randomized, double-blind, four-arm trial in adults undergoing abdominal surgery.术后12小时内单独及联合使用丁丙诺啡和吗啡静脉自控镇痛的效果:一项针对接受腹部手术的成年人的随机、双盲、四臂试验。
Clin Ther. 2009 Mar;31(3):527-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.03.018.
9
Caudal buprenorphine for postoperative analgesia in children: a comparison with intramuscular buprenorphine.儿童术后镇痛用尾侧布托啡诺:与肌肉注射布托啡诺的比较
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1993 May;37(4):361-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1993.tb03729.x.
10
Analgesia following inguinal herniotomy or orchidopexy in children: a comparison of caudal and regional blockade.儿童腹股沟疝修补术或睾丸固定术后的镇痛:骶管阻滞与区域阻滞的比较
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1989 Jun;34(3):143-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of hemodynamic response and postoperative pain score between general anaesthesia with intravenous analgesia versus general anesthesia with caudal analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing open-heart surgery.在接受心脏直视手术的儿科患者中,静脉镇痛全身麻醉与骶管镇痛全身麻醉的血流动力学反应及术后疼痛评分比较。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2019 Jan-Mar;22(1):35-40. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_215_17.
2
Pediatric palliative care: use of opioids for the management of pain.儿科姑息治疗:使用阿片类药物管理疼痛。
Paediatr Drugs. 2009;11(2):129-51. doi: 10.2165/00148581-200911020-00004.
3
[Buprenorphine in children. A clinical and pharmacological review].
[儿童丁丙诺啡。临床与药理学综述]
Schmerz. 2006 Feb;20(1):40-50. doi: 10.1007/s00482-005-0456-1.