• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西类风湿关节炎患者生物疗法的转换

Switching of biological therapies in Brazilian patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

作者信息

de Lucena Valim Juliana Miranda, Gonçalves Chaer Fernanda Gomes, Guimarães da Silveira Fernanda D'Oliveira, da Silva E Lima Verônica Palmiro, Batista de Souza Branca Dias

机构信息

Médica assistente da Reumatologia da ISCMSP, Medicine Department/Rheumatology Division, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo-SP/CEP 01221-900, Brazil.

Médica residente da Reumatologia da ISCMSP, Medicine Department/Rheumatology Division, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo-SP/CEP 01221-900, Brazil.

出版信息

Future Sci OA. 2018 Dec 4;5(1):FSO355. doi: 10.4155/fsoa-2018-0025. eCollection 2019 Jan.

DOI:10.4155/fsoa-2018-0025
PMID:30652022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6331703/
Abstract

AIM

To assess drug switching, rates of remission and disease activity in Brazilian patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with biologic agents.

MATERIALS & METHODS: Using a retrospective method, a total of 94 adult patients were included.

RESULTS

Anti-TNF was the first choice therapy in 85 (90.4%) patients. After an average of 8 years of follow-up, 55 (59%) patients were taking anti-TNF, 18 (19%) abatacept, eight (9%) tocilizumab and 13 (14%) rituximab. In this period, 99 switches of biological therapy were registered in 55 patients.

CONCLUSION

After 8 years of follow-up, 54% of the RA patients on biological therapy were still experiencing high or moderate activity despite established treatment, including switching between different biologic agents.

摘要

目的

评估接受生物制剂治疗的巴西类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的药物转换、缓解率和疾病活动度。

材料与方法

采用回顾性方法,共纳入94例成年患者。

结果

85例(90.4%)患者将抗TNF作为首选治疗。平均随访8年后,55例(59%)患者服用抗TNF,18例(19%)服用阿巴西普,8例(9%)服用托珠单抗,13例(14%)服用利妥昔单抗。在此期间,55例患者记录了99次生物治疗转换。

结论

随访8年后,54%接受生物治疗的RA患者尽管已接受既定治疗,但仍处于高活动度或中度活动度,包括在不同生物制剂之间转换。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73f/6331703/3af369053380/fsoa-05-355-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73f/6331703/7e95cea55b2c/fsoa-05-355-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73f/6331703/7897a6add781/fsoa-05-355-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73f/6331703/28962faae62c/fsoa-05-355-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73f/6331703/1c6b930624de/fsoa-05-355-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73f/6331703/df065f860591/fsoa-05-355-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73f/6331703/3af369053380/fsoa-05-355-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73f/6331703/7e95cea55b2c/fsoa-05-355-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73f/6331703/7897a6add781/fsoa-05-355-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73f/6331703/28962faae62c/fsoa-05-355-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73f/6331703/1c6b930624de/fsoa-05-355-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73f/6331703/df065f860591/fsoa-05-355-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73f/6331703/3af369053380/fsoa-05-355-g6.jpg

相似文献

1
Switching of biological therapies in Brazilian patients with rheumatoid arthritis.巴西类风湿关节炎患者生物疗法的转换
Future Sci OA. 2018 Dec 4;5(1):FSO355. doi: 10.4155/fsoa-2018-0025. eCollection 2019 Jan.
2
Comparison of Healthcare Costs Between Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Infused Biologics After Switching from Another Biologic.从另一种生物制剂转换为接受静脉注射生物制剂治疗的类风湿关节炎患者的医疗费用比较。
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2015 Mar;2(1):99-109. doi: 10.1007/s40801-015-0018-5.
3
EQ-5D utility, response and drug survival in rheumatoid arthritis patients on biologic monotherapy: A prospective observational study of patients registered in the south Swedish SSATG registry.类风湿关节炎患者接受生物单药治疗的EQ-5D效用、反应及药物生存期:一项对瑞典南部SSATG注册登记患者的前瞻性观察研究
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0169946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169946. eCollection 2017.
4
Cost-effectiveness of abatacept, tocilizumab and TNF-inhibitors compared with rituximab as second-line biologic drug in rheumatoid arthritis.阿巴西普、托珠单抗和 TNF 抑制剂与利妥昔单抗作为类风湿关节炎二线生物药物的成本效益比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 24;14(7):e0220142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220142. eCollection 2019.
5
Comparison of Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Therapy Persistence Between Biologics Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Switching from Another Biologic.类风湿关节炎患者从一种生物制剂转换至另一种生物制剂后,不同生物制剂间改善病情抗风湿生物制剂治疗持久性的比较
Rheumatol Ther. 2015 Jun;2(1):59-71. doi: 10.1007/s40744-014-0006-3. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
6
Second-line biologic therapy optimization in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis.类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎和强直性脊柱炎二线生物制剂治疗的优化。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017 Oct;47(2):183-192. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
7
Cost-effectiveness simulation model of biologic strategies for treating to target rheumatoid arthritis in Germany.治疗德国靶向类风湿关节炎的生物策略的成本效益模拟模型。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013 May-Jun;31(3):400-8. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
8
Risk of hospitalised infection in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving biologics following a previous infection while on treatment with anti-TNF therapy.类风湿关节炎患者在接受抗TNF治疗期间既往感染后接受生物制剂治疗时发生住院感染的风险。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jun;74(6):1065-71. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204011. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
9
Associations between an expanded autoantibody profile and treatment responses to biologic therapies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者中扩大的自身抗体谱与生物治疗反应之间的关联。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2021 Feb;91:107260. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107260. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
10
Survival on treatment with second-line biologic therapy: a cohort study comparing cycling and swap strategies.二线生物治疗的生存情况:比较循环和转换策略的队列研究。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014 Sep;53(9):1664-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu158. Epub 2014 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The temporal association between adverse drug reactions and antirheumatic drugs utilisation in Western Australia: a retrospective study from real-world data (1995-2015).澳大利亚西部真实世界数据中药物不良反应与抗风湿药物应用之间的时间关联:一项回顾性研究(1995-2015 年)。
Rheumatol Int. 2024 Jun;44(6):1089-1099. doi: 10.1007/s00296-024-05588-3. Epub 2024 Apr 14.
2
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Sustained and Switching Treatments Using Biological and Targeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: A Multicenter, Observational Cross-Sectional Study for Rheumatoid Arthritis.使用生物制剂和靶向合成改善病情抗风湿药进行持续和转换治疗的患者的人口统计学和临床特征:一项针对类风湿关节炎的多中心观察性横断面研究
Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Feb;9(1):223-241. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00403-y. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Temporal Trends in Use of Biologic DMARDs for Rheumatoid Arthritis in the United States: A Cohort Study of Publicly and Privately Insured Patients.美国类风湿关节炎生物 DMARD 治疗的时间趋势:一项基于公共和私人保险患者的队列研究。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Aug;23(8):809-814. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.8.809.
2
Factors associated with initial or subsequent choice of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.与类风湿关节炎治疗中初始或后续选择生物性疾病改善抗风湿药物相关的因素。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2017 Jul 5;19(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1366-1.
3
Portuguese Recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis- 2016 update.
The first biological choice in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: data from the Moroccan register of biotherapies.类风湿关节炎患者的首个生物学选择:来自摩洛哥生物疗法登记处的数据。
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Feb 17;38:183. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.38.183.27081. eCollection 2021.
葡萄牙类风湿关节炎患者生物治疗使用建议——2016年更新版
Acta Reumatol Port. 2017 Jun 1;42(2)(Apr-Jun):112-126.
4
EQ-5D utility, response and drug survival in rheumatoid arthritis patients on biologic monotherapy: A prospective observational study of patients registered in the south Swedish SSATG registry.类风湿关节炎患者接受生物单药治疗的EQ-5D效用、反应及药物生存期:一项对瑞典南部SSATG注册登记患者的前瞻性观察研究
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0169946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169946. eCollection 2017.
5
Head-to-head comparison of certolizumab pegol versus adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year efficacy and safety results from the randomised EXXELERATE study.依奇珠单抗与阿达木单抗治疗类风湿关节炎的头对头比较:来自随机 EXXELERATE 研究的 2 年疗效和安全性结果。
Lancet. 2016 Dec 3;388(10061):2763-2774. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31651-8. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
6
Non-TNF-Targeted Biologic vs a Second Anti-TNF Drug to Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients With Insufficient Response to a First Anti-TNF Drug: A Randomized Clinical Trial.非肿瘤坏死因子靶向生物制剂与第二种抗肿瘤坏死因子药物治疗对第一种抗肿瘤坏死因子药物反应不足的类风湿关节炎患者:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Sep 20;316(11):1172-1180. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.13512.
7
Comparing Effects of Biologic Agents in Treating Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Multiple Treatment Comparison Regression Analysis.比较生物制剂治疗类风湿关节炎患者的效果:一项多重治疗比较回归分析
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 10;10(9):e0137258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137258. eCollection 2015.
8
Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: 2014 update of the recommendations of an international task force.类风湿关节炎达标治疗:国际特别工作组2014年推荐意见更新
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jan;75(1):3-15. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207524. Epub 2015 May 12.
9
[Demographic and clinical features of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Piauí, Brazil--evaluation of 98 patients].
Rev Bras Reumatol. 2014 Sep-Oct;54(5):360-5. doi: 10.1016/j.rbr.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Jul 6.
10
The 'Switch' study protocol: a randomised-controlled trial of switching to an alternative tumour-necrosis factor (TNF)-inhibitor drug or abatacept or rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have failed an initial TNF-inhibitor drug.“转换”研究方案:一项针对初始肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)抑制剂治疗失败的类风湿关节炎患者,转而使用另一种TNF抑制剂药物、阿巴西普或利妥昔单抗的随机对照试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Dec 23;15:452. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-452.