Beattie Bradley J
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Feb;20(2):154-156. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12531. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
The phantom filling procedures currently specified by the American College of Radiology (ACR) for its PET accreditation program unnecessarily limit how tight the tolerances can be made on the accuracy requirements for the concentrations measured in the resultant images.
New procedures are proposed to improve the accuracy and consistency of the concentrations within the phantom at the time of imaging. These improvements are gained by exchanging the difficult process of accurately measuring a dose with the more easily achieved accurate measurements of time and liquid volume to control final radioactivity concentrations. A comparison of the results when following the two filling procedures is made.
The variability in metrics specified by the ACR was approximately halved by following the new procedures.
These improvements allow tighter thresholds to be applied when evaluating image quality and quantitative accuracy of the PET images. These changes also render this phantom data more suitable for inter-PET-scanner harmonization and improve its utility for comparing image reconstruction methods.
美国放射学会(ACR)目前为其PET认证计划规定的体模填充程序不必要地限制了在所得图像中测量浓度的准确性要求上所能达到的公差精度。
提出了新的程序,以提高成像时体模内浓度的准确性和一致性。通过将精确测量剂量这一困难过程,替换为更易于实现的对时间和液体体积的精确测量,以控制最终放射性浓度,从而实现这些改进。对遵循两种填充程序时的结果进行了比较。
遵循新程序后,ACR规定的指标变异性大约减半。
这些改进使得在评估PET图像的图像质量和定量准确性时能够应用更严格的阈值。这些变化还使该体模数据更适合PET扫描仪之间的协调,并提高了其在比较图像重建方法方面的实用性。