• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整合健康问卷系统以促进学术性乳腺护理中心为患者提供支持性护理服务

Integration of Health Questionnaire Systems to Facilitate Supportive Care Services for Patients at an Academic Breast Care Center.

作者信息

Wong Emily C, Kaplan Celia P, Dreher Nickolas, Hwang Jimmy, Van't Veer Laura, Melisko Michelle E

机构信息

All authors: University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

出版信息

JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018 Dec;2:1-13. doi: 10.1200/CCI.18.00018.

DOI:10.1200/CCI.18.00018
PMID:30652601
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the use of an electronic Health Questionnaire System (HQS) within the University of California San Francisco Breast Care Center as a screening and triage tool to proactively recognize patients' supportive care needs during new patient consultations and identify demographic characteristics associated with referrals to three supportive care services.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 428 patients with and without breast cancer between the ages of 18 and 84 years completed HQS intake forms before appointments at the University of California San Francisco Breast Care Center between November 2014 and May 2015 and agreed to participate in this study. Patient HQS responses triggered referrals to supportive care services, and a review of electronic health records was conducted to determine the outcomes of these referrals.

RESULTS

A total of 242 patients (56.5%) met criteria for at least one supportive care referral. Women with invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ met criteria for supportive services more frequently than women without breast cancer diagnoses (76.9% v 23.8%; P < .001) and were most likely to receive referrals for genetic counseling (67.0%), psychological services (32.2%), and social services (12.1%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that being married was associated with fewer referrals to social work (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.81) and that those between 45 and 54 years of age were less likely to receive referrals to genetic counseling than those ≥ 55 years of age (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.73). Among all referrals (n = 369), 26.8% resulted in completed appointments.

CONCLUSION

Using an automated intake form is an efficient way to identify and triage individuals in need of supportive care services and can provide insight into the populations with supportive care needs for targeted outreach.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校乳腺护理中心使用电子健康问卷系统(HQS)作为一种筛查和分诊工具,以便在新患者咨询期间主动识别患者的支持性护理需求,并确定与转介至三种支持性护理服务相关的人口统计学特征。

患者与方法

2014年11月至2015年5月期间,共有428名年龄在18至84岁之间的乳腺癌患者和非乳腺癌患者在加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校乳腺护理中心预约就诊前填写了HQS intake表格,并同意参与本研究。患者的HQS回答触发了转介至支持性护理服务的流程,并对电子健康记录进行了审查以确定这些转介的结果。

结果

共有242名患者(56.5%)符合至少一项支持性护理转介标准。浸润性乳腺癌或导管原位癌女性比未患乳腺癌的女性更频繁地符合支持性服务标准(76.9%对23.8%;P <.001),并且最有可能接受遗传咨询(67.0%)、心理服务(32.2%)和社会服务(12.1%)的转介。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,已婚与转介至社会工作的次数较少相关(OR,0.42;95%CI,0.21至0.81),并且45至54岁的患者比≥55岁的患者接受遗传咨询转介的可能性更小(OR,0.41;95%CI,0.23至0.73)。在所有转介(n = 369)中,26.8%导致预约完成。

结论

使用自动录入表格是识别和分诊需要支持性护理服务的个体的有效方法,并且可以深入了解有支持性护理需求的人群,以便进行有针对性的外展服务。

相似文献

1
Integration of Health Questionnaire Systems to Facilitate Supportive Care Services for Patients at an Academic Breast Care Center.整合健康问卷系统以促进学术性乳腺护理中心为患者提供支持性护理服务
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018 Dec;2:1-13. doi: 10.1200/CCI.18.00018.
2
Assessing preferences for receiving supportive care resources among patients seen at a Breast Care Center.评估在乳腺保健中心就诊的患者对接受支持性护理资源的偏好。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Sep;183(2):381-389. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05786-0. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
3
Most prevalent unmet supportive care needs and quality of life of breast cancer patients in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia.马来西亚一家三级医院乳腺癌患者最普遍未满足的支持性护理需求及生活质量
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Feb 22;14:26. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0428-4.
4
Long-Term Survival of Women with Breast Cancer. Overview Supportive Care Needs Assessment Instruments.乳腺癌女性的长期生存。支持性护理需求评估工具概述。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;989:281-284. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-57348-9_25.
5
Factors associated with referral offer and acceptance following supportive care problem identification in a comprehensive cancer service.综合癌症服务中支持性护理问题识别后与转诊提议及接受相关的因素。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Sep;27(5):e12869. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12869. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
6
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
7
Improving access to supportive cancer care through an eHealth application: a qualitative needs assessment among cancer survivors.通过电子健康应用程序改善癌症支持性护理的可及性:癌症幸存者的定性需求评估
J Clin Nurs. 2015 May;24(9-10):1367-79. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12753. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
8
Un-met supportive care needs of Iranian breast cancer patients.伊朗乳腺癌患者未满足的支持性护理需求。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(9):3933-8. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.9.3933.
9
Self-referrals versus physician referrals: What new patient visit yields an actual surgical case?自我转诊与医生转诊:哪种新患者就诊方式会产生实际的手术病例?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Sep;29(3):314-321. doi: 10.3171/2018.1.SPINE17793. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
10
Cancer survivors' perceived need for supportive care and their attitude towards self-management and eHealth.癌症幸存者对支持性护理的感知需求及其对自我管理和电子健康的态度。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jun;23(6):1679-88. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2514-7. Epub 2014 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences for breast cancer survivorship programs among multiracial and ethnic women.多种族和族裔女性对乳腺癌幸存者项目的偏好
Res Sq. 2024 Dec 9:rs.3.rs-5312826. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5312826/v1.
2
Implementation and impact of an electronic patient reported outcomes system in a phase II multi-site adaptive platform clinical trial for early-stage breast cancer.电子患者报告结局系统在早期乳腺癌II期多中心适应性平台临床试验中的实施与影响
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Jan 1;32(1):172-180. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae190.
3
Examining disparities in large-scale patient-reported data capture using digital tools among cancer patients at clinical intake.
利用数字工具在癌症患者临床入组时大规模采集患者报告数据,考察其中的差异。
Cancer Med. 2023 Sep;12(18):19033-19046. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6459. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
4
A case-case analysis of women with breast cancer: predictors of interval vs screen-detected cancer.乳腺癌女性病例对照分析:间期与筛查检出癌症的预测因素。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Feb;191(3):623-629. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06451-w. Epub 2021 Nov 29.