1 Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
2 Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019 Apr;18(4):299-308. doi: 10.1177/1474515118821242. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
Research supporting the benefits of person-centred care is growing, still knowledge about patients' experiences of person-centred care is limited.
To evaluate the effects of person-centred care on patients' experiences of care, and also in relation to educational level, after an acute coronary syndrome.
A total of 199 patients aged less than 75 years, hospitalised for acute coronary syndrome, were randomly assigned to either standard cardiac care ( n=105) or person-centred care plus standard cardiac care ( n=94). Experience of care was assessed at three healthcare settings (hospital, outpatient and primary care) using the 15-item Picker patient experience questionnaire plus two questions concerning information and documentation.
No significant difference was found at the three healthcare settings between the two study groups in the Picker patient experience questionnaire total score. Item level analysis showed that the person-centred care group significantly improved at all three healthcare settings on information received and in documentation of care compared with the standard cardiac care group ( P<0.05). In outpatient care, the person-centred care group reported significantly better family-physician communication ( P=0.004) and information for the family ( P=0.007) compared with the standard cardiac care group. In patients without postsecondary education, the corresponding figures were even more in favour of the person-centred care group ( P=0.0005 and P=0.0049, respectively), and they also reported higher involvement in care decisions ( P=0.023).
A person-centred care approach after an event of acute coronary syndrome improves patients' care experiences for information, shared documentation and involvement of family and friends. This effect was especially prominent in patients with a low educational level, who were also more involved in care decisions.
Swedish registry, Researchweb.org , ID NR 65 791.
越来越多的研究支持以患者为中心的护理的益处,但患者对以患者为中心的护理的体验的了解仍然有限。
评估在急性冠状动脉综合征后,以患者为中心的护理对患者护理体验的影响,以及与教育程度的关系。
共有 199 名年龄小于 75 岁的急性冠状动脉综合征住院患者被随机分为标准心脏护理组(n=105)和以患者为中心的护理加标准心脏护理组(n=94)。使用 15 项 Picker 患者体验问卷和两个关于信息和记录的问题,在三个医疗保健环境(医院、门诊和初级保健)评估护理体验。
在三个医疗保健环境中,两组患者在 Picker 患者体验问卷总分上均无显著差异。项目水平分析显示,与标准心脏护理组相比,以患者为中心的护理组在所有三个医疗保健环境中,在获得的信息和护理记录方面均显著改善(P<0.05)。在门诊护理中,以患者为中心的护理组报告与标准心脏护理组相比,家庭医生沟通(P=0.004)和家庭信息(P=0.007)更好。在未接受过中学后教育的患者中,以患者为中心的护理组的情况更为有利(分别为 P=0.0005 和 P=0.0049),并且他们在护理决策中的参与度也更高(P=0.023)。
在急性冠状动脉综合征事件后采用以患者为中心的护理方法可以改善患者对信息、共同记录以及家人和朋友参与的护理体验。这种效果在教育程度较低的患者中尤为明显,他们在护理决策中的参与度也更高。
瑞典注册处,Researchweb.org,ID NR 65 791。