• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以患者为中心的护理工具韩文版的验证:针对门诊患者。

Validation of the Korean Version of Patient-Centered Care Tool: For Outpatients.

作者信息

Kim Yeo Ju, Lee Gunjeong, Choi Sunyeob

机构信息

College of Nursing, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.

Inje University Ilsan-Paik Hospital, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Jun 29;17:1525-1540. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S411109. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S411109
PMID:37405193
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10317544/
Abstract

AIM

The objective of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the patient-centered care (K-PCC) instrument for outpatients. The study was conducted due to the absence of a measurement tool specifically designed to evaluate patient-centered care for outpatients.

DESIGN

This study is a methodological study to verify the validity and reliability of the Korean version of Patient-Centered Care (K-PCC) to measure patient-centeredness for outpatients.

METHODS

As a first step for the evaluation of the tool, the content validity was verified by expert panel. Then, a total of 400 outpatients were recruited, and construct validity was verified through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) as the second step for the evaluation of the tool. The convergent and discriminant validity of the tool was verified by calculating the standardized factor loads, construct reliability (CR), and average variance extracted (AVE), and calculating the correlation square between the factors as the third and fourth steps for the evaluation of the tool. And as a fifth step for the evaluation of the tool, criterion validity was evaluated by comparing the correlation with the patient-centeredness measurement tool for inpatients (PEx-inpatient). In estimating reliability, internal consistency reliability coefficients were calculated.

RESULTS

The confirmatory factor analysis supported good fit for the Korean patient-centered care instrument (K-PCC), and the eight-factor structure was validated. The scale comprises 21 items across eight factors: patient preferences (4 items), physical comfort (2 items), coordination of care (2 items), continuity and transition (3 items), emotional support (2 items), access to medical care (3 items), information and education (2 items), and family and friends (3 items). The Cronbach's alphas ranging between 0.73 and 0.88.

CONCLUSION

The Korean patient-centered primary care instrument is a valid and reliable scale to measure patient-centered care for outpatients in the Korean medical environment.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估门诊患者以患者为中心的护理(K-PCC)工具韩语版的有效性和可靠性。由于缺乏专门用于评估门诊患者以患者为中心护理的测量工具,故开展本研究。

设计

本研究是一项方法学研究,旨在验证韩语版以患者为中心的护理(K-PCC)测量门诊患者以患者为中心程度的有效性和可靠性。

方法

作为工具评估的第一步,通过专家小组验证内容效度。然后,招募了400名门诊患者,作为工具评估的第二步,通过验证性因子分析(CFA)验证结构效度。作为工具评估的第三步和第四步,通过计算标准化因子载荷、结构可靠性(CR)和平均提取方差(AVE),并计算因子之间的相关平方,验证工具的收敛效度和区分效度。作为工具评估的第五步,通过与住院患者以患者为中心的护理测量工具(PEx-住院患者)比较相关性来评估效标效度。在估计可靠性时,计算内部一致性可靠性系数。

结果

验证性因子分析支持韩语以患者为中心的护理工具(K-PCC)具有良好的拟合度,并验证了八因子结构。该量表包括八个因子的21个项目:患者偏好(4项)、身体舒适度(2项)、护理协调(2项)、连续性和过渡(3项)、情感支持(2项)、医疗服务可及性(3项)、信息与教育(2项)以及家人和朋友(3项)。克朗巴哈系数在0.73至0.88之间。

结论

韩语以患者为中心的初级护理工具是一种有效且可靠的量表,可用于测量韩国医疗环境中门诊患者以患者为中心的护理情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3861/10317544/3a02658be965/PPA-17-1525-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3861/10317544/3a02658be965/PPA-17-1525-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3861/10317544/3a02658be965/PPA-17-1525-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the Korean Version of Patient-Centered Care Tool: For Outpatients.以患者为中心的护理工具韩文版的验证:针对门诊患者。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Jun 29;17:1525-1540. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S411109. eCollection 2023.
2
[Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of Person-Centered Practice Inventory-Staff for Nurses].[韩国版护士以患者为中心实践量表-员工版的效度与信度]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2021 Jun;51(3):363-379. doi: 10.4040/jkan.21027.
3
Contextualizing the revised Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness (PPPC-R) scale in primary healthcare settings: a validity and reliability evaluation study.在基层医疗环境中对修订后的患者感知以患者为中心量表(PPPC-R)进行语境化:一项有效性和可靠性评估研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jan 5;25(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02227-x.
4
Validation of the Korean Version of the Assessment of Strategies in Families-Effectiveness Scale.《家庭策略有效性评估量表(韩文版)》的验证。
J Nurs Res. 2023 Oct 1;31(5):e290. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000569.
5
[Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life].《韩国版更年期特异性生活质量的有效性和可靠性》
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2020 Jun;50(3):487-500. doi: 10.4040/jkan.20049.
6
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Watson Caritas Patient Score.韩文版沃森关爱患者评分的效度与信度
J Nurs Res. 2020 Apr;28(2):e80. doi: 10.1097/JNR.0000000000000351.
7
Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Patient readiness to engage in health information technology (PRE-HIT) instrument.患者准备使用健康信息技术(PRE-HIT)工具的波斯语版本的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Mar 19;23(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01665-3.
8
Reliability and validity study of the Thai adaptation of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory-Student Survey (CBI-SS) among preclinical medical students at the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand.泰国玛希隆大学诗里拉吉医院医学院预科医学生使用哥本哈根倦怠量表学生调查(CBI-SS)的泰语适应性可靠性和有效性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 30;16(12):e0261887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261887. eCollection 2021.
9
Cross-Cultural Validation of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Revised (MQOL-R), Korean Version; A Focus on People at the End of Life.《麦吉尔生活质量问卷修订版(MQOL-R)韩文版的跨文化验证:关注临终者》
J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Sep 1;25(3):110-120. doi: 10.14475/jhpc.2022.25.3.110.
10
Testing the validity and reliability of the Korean nursing surveillance scale: a methodological study.检验韩国护理监测量表的有效性和可靠性:一项方法学研究。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Oct 2;23(1):709. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02378-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Consultation time and communication patterns in outpatient care: an observational study in South Korea.门诊护理中的会诊时间与沟通模式:韩国的一项观察性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 30;25(1):1159. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13431-z.
2
Development and Psychometric Test of the Inpatients Experiences Measurement Scale (IEMS).住院患者体验测量量表(IEMS)的编制与心理测量学测试
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Jun 27;18:1359-1372. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S457746. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
The Satisfaction With Care of Patients With Schizophrenia in Taiwan: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Patient-Centered Care Domains.台湾精神分裂症患者的护理满意度:以患者为中心的护理领域横断面调查
J Nurs Res. 2023 Apr 1;31(2):e268. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000549.
2
[Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of Person-Centered Practice Inventory-Staff for Nurses].[韩国版护士以患者为中心实践量表-员工版的效度与信度]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2021 Jun;51(3):363-379. doi: 10.4040/jkan.21027.
3
Views of patients with multi-morbidity on what is important for patient-centered care in the primary care setting.
多病症患者对初级保健环境中以患者为中心的护理的重要性的看法。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Apr 26;21(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01144-7.
4
[Development of the Patient-Centered Nursing Culture Scale for Hospitals].[医院以患者为中心的护理文化量表的编制]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2019 Oct;49(5):613-630. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2019.49.5.613.
5
A New Comprehensive Measure of High-Value Aspects of Primary Care.一种新的初级保健高价值方面的综合衡量指标。
Ann Fam Med. 2019 May;17(3):221-230. doi: 10.1370/afm.2393.
6
Associations between provider communication and personal recovery outcomes.提供者沟通与个人康复结果之间的关联。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 29;19(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2084-9.
7
The impact of person-centred care on patients' care experiences in relation to educational level after acute coronary syndrome: secondary outcome analysis of a randomised controlled trial.以急性冠状动脉综合征后教育水平为参照,探讨以患者为中心的护理对患者护理体验的影响:一项随机对照试验的次要结局分析。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019 Apr;18(4):299-308. doi: 10.1177/1474515118821242. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
8
[Effects of Communication Empowerment Program Based on Situated Learning Theory for Nursing Students].基于情境学习理论的护生沟通赋能项目的效果
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2018 Dec;48(6):708-719. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2018.48.6.708.
9
Validation of an instrument for the assessment of patient-centred care among patients with multimorbidity in the primary care setting: the 36-item patient-centred primary care instrument.用于评估基层医疗环境中患有多种疾病患者的以患者为中心的照护的工具的验证:36项以患者为中心的基层医疗工具。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Aug 28;19(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0832-4.
10
Hospitalization from the patient perspective: a data linkage study of adults in Australia.从患者角度看住院治疗:澳大利亚成年人的数据关联研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Jun 1;30(5):358-365. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy024.