• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作记忆中自我参照刺激的自动优先化。

Automatic Prioritization of Self-Referential Stimuli in Working Memory.

机构信息

1 Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality of the Ministry of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University.

2 Department of Psychology, University of Bath.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;30(3):415-423. doi: 10.1177/0956797618818483. Epub 2019 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1177/0956797618818483
PMID:30653399
Abstract

People preferentially attend to external stimuli that are related to themselves compared with others. Whether a similar self-reference bias applies to internal representations, such as those maintained in working memory (WM), is presently unknown. We tested this possibility in four experiments, in which participants were first trained to associate social labels (self, friend, stranger) with arbitrary colors and then performed a delayed match-to-sample spatial WM task on color locations. Participants consistently responded fastest to WM probes at locations of self-associated colors (Experiments 1-4). This self-bias was driven not by differential exogenous attention during encoding or retrieval (Experiments 1 and 2) but by internal attentional prioritization of self-related representations during WM maintenance (Experiment 3). Moreover, self-prioritization in WM was nonstrategic, as this bias persisted even under conditions in which it hurt WM performance. These findings document an automatic prioritization of self-referential items in WM, which may form the basis of some egocentric biases in decision making.

摘要

人们更倾向于关注与自己相关的外部刺激,而不是与他人相关的刺激。目前尚不清楚这种类似的自我参照偏差是否适用于内部表示形式,例如工作记忆 (WM) 中保持的内部表示形式。我们在四项实验中检验了这种可能性,在这些实验中,参与者首先接受训练,将社交标签(自我、朋友、陌生人)与任意颜色相关联,然后在颜色位置上执行延迟匹配样本空间 WM 任务。参与者在与自我关联颜色的位置上对 WM 探针的反应始终最快(实验 1-4)。这种自我偏差不是由编码或检索期间的差异外注意驱动的(实验 1 和 2),而是由 WM 维持期间对自我相关表示形式的内部注意优先级驱动的(实验 3)。此外,WM 中的自我优先化是非策略性的,因为即使在这种偏差会损害 WM 表现的情况下,这种偏差仍然存在。这些发现记录了 WM 中自我参照项目的自动优先级,这可能是决策中某些自我中心偏差的基础。

相似文献

1
Automatic Prioritization of Self-Referential Stimuli in Working Memory.工作记忆中自我参照刺激的自动优先化。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;30(3):415-423. doi: 10.1177/0956797618818483. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
2
Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Drives the Prioritization of Self-Associated Stimuli in Working Memory.腹内侧前额叶皮层驱动工作记忆中自我相关刺激的优先级。
J Neurosci. 2021 Mar 3;41(9):2012-2023. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1783-20.2020. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
3
Decoding working memory content from attentional biases.从注意力偏差中解码工作记忆内容。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1252-1260. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1204-5.
4
The self-bias in working memory: the favorability of self-referential stimuli in resource allocation.工作记忆中的自我偏向:自我参照刺激在资源分配中的有利性。
Memory. 2024 May;32(5):517-527. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2024.2341709. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
5
The capacity and resolution of spatial working memory and its role in the storage of non-spatial features.空间工作记忆的容量、分辨率及其在非空间特征存储中的作用。
Biol Psychol. 2019 Jan;140:108-118. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.12.006. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
6
Center-Surround Inhibition in Working Memory.工作记忆中的中心-外周抑制
Curr Biol. 2016 Jan 11;26(1):64-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.013. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
7
The working memory stroop effect: when internal representations clash with external stimuli.工作记忆斯特鲁普效应:当内部表征与外部刺激发生冲突时。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Aug;25(8):1619-29. doi: 10.1177/0956797614536739. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
8
Retrospective Cues Mitigate Information Loss in Human Cortex during Working Memory Storage.回溯线索减轻了人类大脑在工作记忆存储过程中的信息丢失。
J Neurosci. 2018 Oct 3;38(40):8538-8548. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1566-18.2018. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
9
Selection within working memory based on a color retro-cue modulates alpha oscillations.基于颜色回溯线索的工作记忆选择调节 alpha 振荡。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Nov;106:133-137. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.09.027. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
10
Selection in spatial working memory is independent of perceptual selective attention, but they interact in a shared spatial priority map.空间工作记忆中的选择独立于知觉选择性注意,但它们在一个共享的空间优先级图谱中相互作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Nov;77(8):2653-68. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0976-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Working memory capacity and self-cues: Consistent benefits in children and adults.工作记忆容量与自我线索:儿童和成人的一致益处。
Br J Psychol. 2025 Aug;116(3):575-593. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12778. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
2
Cognitive and neural underpinnings of friend-prioritization in a perceptual matching task.知觉匹配任务中朋友优先级的认知与神经基础
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025 Feb 3;20(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaf009.
3
A human working memory advantage for social network information.人类对社交网络信息的工作记忆优势。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Dec;291(2036):20241930. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1930. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
4
Can irrelevant self-related information in working memory be actively suppressed?工作记忆中的不相关自我相关信息能否被主动抑制?
Psych J. 2024 Dec;13(6):893-902. doi: 10.1002/pchj.790. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
5
Attenuated conflict self-referential information facilitating conflict resolution.减弱的冲突自我参照信息有助于冲突解决。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2024 Jul 19;9(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s41539-024-00256-4.
6
Being able to think when caught in the maelstrom - how adolescents used mindfulness when facing exams.能够在漩涡中思考——青少年在面对考试时如何运用正念。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024 Dec;19(1):2375660. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2375660. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
7
Self-prioritization in working memory gating.工作记忆门控中的自我优先级设定
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Feb;87(2):399-414. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02869-8. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
8
Self-referential information optimizes conflict adaptation.自我参照信息优化冲突适应。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Apr;52(3):648-662. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01490-8. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
9
How far can the self be extended? Automatic attention capture is triggered not only by the self-face.自我能扩展到多远?自动注意捕获不仅由自我面孔触发。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 3;14:1279653. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1279653. eCollection 2023.
10
Towards the self and away from the others: evidence for self-prioritization observed in an approach avoidance task.朝向自我并远离他人:在趋近-回避任务中观察到的自我优先化证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 5;14:1041157. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1041157. eCollection 2023.