Division of Cardiac Prevention and Rehabilitation, Exercise Physiology and Cardiovascular Health Lab, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON K1C 4W7, Canada.
Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, and Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, 1-052 Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1, Canada.
Metabolism. 2019 May;94:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
Metformin and lifestyle intervention are frequently prescribed together as first-line treatments for type 2 diabetes. However, little is known about their interplay. We investigated if the effects of a lifestyle intervention on glycemia, body mass and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) were influenced by metformin therapy.
Participants randomized to intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) or diabetes support and education (DSE) from the Look AHEAD trial were categorized into metformin therapy vs. no metformin. A two-by-two ANCOVA (i.e., metformin therapy vs. no metformin by ILI vs. DSE) was used to examine the changes in glycated hemoglobin A1C, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body mass, and CRF over the first year post-randomization, with a primary interest in the metformin-by-lifestyle interaction effect.
Data from 1982 participants were analyzed. There was a significant metformin-by-lifestyle interaction effect on A1C (p = 0.031) and FPG (p = 0.043), resulting from larger reductions associated with metformin therapy compared to no metformin following DSE, but slightly smaller reduction associated with metformin therapy compared to no metformin following ILI. Metformin therapy was associated with smaller weight loss (-4.7 ± 6.2 vs. -5.7 ± 6.3 kg; main effect: p = 0.001) but not with differential CRF changes when compared to no metformin.
The interaction between metformin therapy and lifestyle intervention on glycemia highlights the complicated nature of combining therapies. While the small influence of background metformin therapy on intensive lifestyle intervention should not discourage the concomitant use of these therapies, our results showed that, for individuals undergoing intensive lifestyle therapy, background metformin therapy conferred little additional benefits.
二甲双胍和生活方式干预经常被联合用于治疗 2 型糖尿病的一线治疗方法。然而,对于它们的相互作用知之甚少。我们研究了生活方式干预对血糖、体重和心肺功能(CRF)的影响是否受二甲双胍治疗的影响。
来自 LOOK AHEAD 试验的随机分配到强化生活方式干预(ILI)或糖尿病支持和教育(DSE)的参与者被分为二甲双胍治疗组和非二甲双胍治疗组。使用二因素协方差分析(即 ILI 与 DSE 中的二甲双胍治疗与非二甲双胍治疗)来检查随机分组后第一年糖化血红蛋白 A1C、空腹血浆葡萄糖(FPG)、体重和 CRF 的变化,主要关注二甲双胍与生活方式的相互作用效应。
分析了 1982 名参与者的数据。A1C(p=0.031)和 FPG(p=0.043)存在显著的二甲双胍与生活方式的交互作用效应,这是由于与 DSE 相比,二甲双胍治疗与非二甲双胍治疗相比,A1C 和 FPG 的降低幅度更大,但与 ILI 相比,二甲双胍治疗与非二甲双胍治疗相比,降低幅度略小。与非二甲双胍治疗相比,二甲双胍治疗与体重减轻较少(-4.7±6.2 与-5.7±6.3kg;主要效应:p=0.001),但与心肺功能变化无差异。
二甲双胍治疗与生活方式干预对血糖的相互作用强调了联合治疗的复杂性。虽然背景二甲双胍治疗对强化生活方式干预的影响较小,但不应劝阻同时使用这些治疗方法,我们的结果表明,对于接受强化生活方式治疗的个体,背景二甲双胍治疗几乎没有带来额外的益处。