Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Immanuel Klinik, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
Division of Prison Health, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Psychopathology. 2019;52(1):2-9. doi: 10.1159/000495844. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
High rates of mental disorders have been reported for prison populations. Understanding patterns of comorbidity may be essential for the development of adequate treatment interventions. The present study aimed to assess the underlying structure of comorbidity between mental health and substance use disorders in prison populations.
Current mental disorders were assessed using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview in a cross-sectional observational study of 427 individuals consecutively committed to prison facilities in Santiago, Chile. Five alternative structural models were tested using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Latent class analysis of comorbid mental health and substance use disorders was carried out.
CFA indicated the best fit for a bifactor model with a general psychopathology P factor and specific internalizing and externalizing factors. Borderline personality disorder loaded highest on the P factor (0.85). The latent comorbidity structure showed a four-class solution representing one class without relevant comorbidities (48% prevalence) and three classes representing the following comorbidities: (1) externalizing disorders including substance use and antisocial personality disorder (31%), (2) internalizing disorders including anxiety disorders (10%), and (3) all types of disorders co-occurring (11%). Major depression and borderline personality disorder were present across all three latent classes of comorbidity.
Prison mental health services need to serve a highly comorbid population. Specific approaches may be useful for an externalizing and an internalizing spectrum of disorders. An important group of individuals with all types of mental disorders co-occurring may need new approaches in treatment development.
监狱人群的精神障碍发病率较高。了解共病模式对于制定充分的治疗干预措施可能至关重要。本研究旨在评估监狱人群中精神健康和物质使用障碍共病的潜在结构。
在智利圣地亚哥的一个连续纳入监狱设施的 427 名个体的横断面观察性研究中,使用 Mini-国际神经精神访谈评估当前的精神障碍。使用验证性因子分析(CFA)测试了五种替代结构模型。对共患精神健康和物质使用障碍进行潜在类别分析。
CFA 表明双因素模型具有最佳拟合度,具有一般精神病理学 P 因素和特定的内化和外化因素。边缘型人格障碍在 P 因素上的负荷最高(0.85)。潜在的共病结构显示出四分类解决方案,代表一类无相关共病(患病率为 48%)和三类代表以下共病:(1)包括物质使用和反社会人格障碍的外化障碍(31%),(2)包括焦虑障碍的内化障碍(10%),以及(3)所有类型的障碍同时发生(11%)。主要抑郁症和边缘型人格障碍存在于共病的所有三个潜在类别中。
监狱心理健康服务需要为高度共病的人群提供服务。针对外化和内化障碍谱的特定方法可能是有用的。一个存在所有类型精神障碍共病的重要人群可能需要在治疗开发中采用新方法。