Escuela de Psicología y Fiolosofía, Universidad de Tarapacá, Arica 1010069, Chile.
Psychology Department, University of Oviedo, 33003 Oviedo, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 2;18(3):1361. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031361.
Major depression is one of the most prevalent mental health problems in the penitentiary context and has been related to different undesirable outcomes. The aim of the current research was to evaluate the utility of screening tools for major depression brief assessment in the jail context. We interviewed 203 male inmates and complimented the MCMI-III, the SCL-90-R, and the CES-D-7 self-informed scales. Major depression syndrome and disorder were determined based on MCMI-III criteria and the capability of SCL-90-R and CES-D-7 to identify true positives and true negatives when tested. SCL-90-R and CES-D-7 showed good sensitivity for major depression syndrome and disorder. The specificity of SCL-90-R was poor in all cases, but CES-D-7 showed good specificity depending on the cut-off score. Rigorous interviews are needed for better evaluation of major depression in jails, but screening tools like CES-D-7 are useful for rapid assessment considering the work overload of penitentiary psychologists.
重性抑郁症是监狱环境中最常见的心理健康问题之一,与不同的不良后果有关。本研究旨在评估监狱环境中用于大 重性抑郁简要评估的筛查工具的效用。我们对 203 名男性囚犯进行了访谈,并补充了 MCMI-III、SCL-90-R 和 CES-D-7 自我报告量表。根据 MCMI-III 标准以及 SCL-90-R 和 CES-D-7 在测试时识别真阳性和真阴性的能力,确定了重性抑郁综合征和障碍。SCL-90-R 和 CES-D-7 对重性抑郁综合征和障碍具有良好的敏感性。在所有情况下,SCL-90-R 的特异性都较差,但 CES-D-7 的特异性取决于截止分数。需要进行严格的访谈,以更好地评估监狱中的重性抑郁症,但考虑到监狱心理学家的工作负荷,CES-D-7 等筛查工具对于快速评估仍然是有用的。