Martinez Fernando J, Abrahams Roger A, Ferguson Gary T, Bjermer Leif, Grönke Lars, Voß Florian, Singh Dave
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA,
Morgantown Pulmonary Clinical Research, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Jan 4;14:181-194. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S179912. eCollection 2019.
In symptomatic patients with COPD, the decision whether to initiate maintenance treatment with a single agent or a combination of long-acting bronchodilators remains unclear.
To investigate whether baseline symptomatic status influences response to tiotropium/olodaterol treatment.
Post hoc analysis of the randomized OTEMTO studies (NCT01964352; NCT02006732), in which patients with moderate-to-severe COPD received placebo, tiotropium 5 µg, tiotropium/olodaterol 2.5/5 µg, or tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 µg once daily for 12 weeks via the Respimat inhaler (Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany). Impact of baseline symptomatic status (modified Medical Research Council [mMRC] score) on response to treatment with tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 µg, tiotropium 5 µg, or placebo at Week 12 was assessed by St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and response rate, transition dyspnea index (TDI) focal score and response rate, and trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second response.
Tiotropium/olodaterol improved SGRQ total scores and response rates compared with placebo and tiotropium for patients with baseline mMRC scores 0-1 and ≥2. For tiotropium/olodaterol vs tiotropium, greater improvements were observed for patients with mMRC ≥2 (SGRQ score adjusted mean treatment difference -3.44 [95% CI: -5.43, -1.46]; =0.0007; SGRQ response rate ORs 2.09 [95% CI: 1.41, 3.10]; =0.0002). Dyspnea, measured by TDI score, was consistently improved with tiotropium/olodaterol vs placebo for patients with mMRC scores 0-1 and ≥2 (adjusted mean treatment difference 1.63 [95% CI: 1.06, 2.20]; <0.0001 and 1.60 [95% CI: 1.09, 2.10]; <0.0001, respectively). In patients with mMRC scores 0-1 and ≥2, tiotropium/olodaterol consistently improved TDI response rate and lung function vs placebo and tiotropium.
Patients with COPD with more severe baseline dyspnea appear to derive greater health status benefit with tiotropium/olodaterol compared with tiotropium alone.
在有症状的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中,对于是开始使用单一药物还是联合使用长效支气管扩张剂进行维持治疗,目前仍不明确。
研究基线症状状态是否会影响噻托溴铵/奥达特罗治疗的反应。
对随机化的OTEMTO研究(NCT01964352;NCT02006732)进行事后分析,在这些研究中,中重度COPD患者通过Respimat吸入器(德国莱茵河畔英格尔海姆的勃林格殷格翰公司)每日一次接受安慰剂、5μg噻托溴铵、2.5/5μg噻托溴铵/奥达特罗或5/5μg噻托溴铵/奥达特罗治疗,为期12周。通过圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)总分和反应率、过渡性呼吸困难指数(TDI)焦点评分和反应率以及第1秒用力呼气容积谷值反应,评估基线症状状态(改良医学研究委员会[mMRC]评分)对12周时接受5/5μg噻托溴铵/奥达特罗、5μg噻托溴铵或安慰剂治疗反应的影响。
对于基线mMRC评分为0 - 1和≥2的患者,与安慰剂和噻托溴铵相比,噻托溴铵/奥达特罗改善了SGRQ总分和反应率。对于噻托溴铵/奥达特罗与噻托溴铵相比,mMRC≥2的患者有更大改善(SGRQ评分调整后的平均治疗差异为 - 3.44[95%CI: - 5.43, - 1.46];P = 0.0007;SGRQ反应率OR为2.09[95%CI:1.41,3.10];P = 0.0002)。对于mMRC评分为0 - 1和≥2的患者,通过TDI评分测量的呼吸困难,与安慰剂相比,噻托溴铵/奥达特罗持续改善(调整后的平均治疗差异为1.63[95%CI:1.06,2.20];P < 0.0001和1.60[95%CI:1.09,2.10];P < 0.0001)。在mMRC评分为0 - 1和≥2的患者中,与安慰剂和噻托溴铵相比,噻托溴铵/奥达特罗持续改善TDI反应率和肺功能。
与单独使用噻托溴铵相比,基线呼吸困难更严重的COPD患者使用噻托溴铵/奥达特罗似乎能在健康状况方面获得更大益处。