Arima Nobuyuki, Nishimura Reiki, Osako Tomofumi, Okumura Yasuhiro, Nakano Masahiro, Fujisue Mamiko, Nishiyama Yasuyuki, Toyozumi Yasuo
Department of Pathology, Kumamoto Shinto General Hospital, Kumamoto 862-8655, Japan.
Department of Breast Oncology, Kumamoto Shinto General Hospital, Kumamoto 862-8655, Japan.
Oncol Lett. 2019 Jan;17(1):616-622. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9633. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
Gene profiling has identified at least 4 breast cancer subtypes, including Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-enriched and basal-like, and immunohistochemistry is used as a guide to determine these subtypes. In the present study, patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative and negative nodes were classified into 4 groups according to the PgR and the Ki-67 status and were retrospectively examined. The analysis was based on the clinicopathological findings, and includes the recurrence score (RS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates. Patients with invasive breast cancer (n=1866) were classified as LA (high PgR/low Ki-67), LB-1 (high PgR/high Ki-67), LB-2 (low PgR/high Ki-67), and LB-3 (low PgR/low Ki-67). In addition, 41 of the cases underwent a 21-gene expression assay. The data revealed that T1 tumors were more prevalent in the LA group and rare in the LB-2 group. Furthermore, nuclear grade 3 and p53 overexpression was revealed to be significantly correlated with LB-2. In terms of prognosis, LA had a significantly more favorable DFS; however, no differences were observed in the LB-3 group. LB-2 had a significantly worse DFS in all cases, and in the cases administered with endocrine therapy alone. Chemotherapy in combination with endocrine therapy was administered to cases with a higher risk of recurrence. In the LB-2 group, there was no difference in the DFS rates between the cases with endocrine therapy and chemo-endocrine therapy. These findings suggest that chemotherapy could improve the DFS in the LB-2 group. In addition, the majority of cases with LA, LB-3 and LB-1 had a RS of ≤25 and the majority of the LB-2 cases had a RS of >25. The patients with LA and LB-3 had a favorable DFS even in the group that received endocrine therapy alone. LB-2 was significantly correlated with a higher degree of malignancy and benefited from chemotherapy. These data suggest that the PgR and the Ki-67 status are effective in predicting prognosis, and for deciding on the most effective treatment strategy in patients with breast cancer.
基因谱分析已确定至少4种乳腺癌亚型,包括腔面A型、腔面B型、HER2富集型和基底样型,免疫组化被用作确定这些亚型的指导方法。在本研究中,雌激素受体(ER)阳性、HER2阴性且无淋巴结转移的患者根据孕激素受体(PgR)和Ki-67状态分为4组,并进行回顾性研究。分析基于临床病理结果,包括复发评分(RS)和无病生存率(DFS)。浸润性乳腺癌患者(n = 1866)被分为LA(高PgR/低Ki-67)、LB-1(高PgR/高Ki-67)、LB-2(低PgR/高Ki-67)和LB-3(低PgR/低Ki-67)。此外,41例患者进行了21基因表达检测。数据显示,T1期肿瘤在LA组中更为常见,在LB-2组中罕见。此外,核分级3级和p53过表达与LB-2显著相关。在预后方面,LA组的DFS明显更好;然而,LB-3组未观察到差异。LB-2组在所有病例以及仅接受内分泌治疗的病例中DFS明显更差。复发风险较高的病例接受化疗联合内分泌治疗。在LB-2组中,内分泌治疗病例和化疗-内分泌治疗病例的DFS率没有差异。这些发现表明化疗可以改善LB-2组的DFS。此外,大多数LA、LB-3和LB-1病例的RS≤25,大多数LB-2病例的RS>25。LA和LB-3患者即使在仅接受内分泌治疗的组中DFS也较好。LB-2与更高程度的恶性肿瘤显著相关,并且从化疗中获益。这些数据表明PgR和Ki-67状态可有效预测预后,并有助于决定乳腺癌患者最有效的治疗策略。