Carminati Marcello, Sempf Darja, Bonfirraro Pier Paolo, Devalle Luca, Verga Maurizio, Righi Bernardo, Mevio Gabriele, Leone Francesco, Fenaroli Privato, Robotti Enrico
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Dec 14;6(12):e1949. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001949. eCollection 2018 Dec.
The risk of infection continues to be a subject of discussion within the field of implant-based breast reconstruction. Studies have shown the feasibility of immediate single-stage procedures with acellular dermal matrix (ADM), yet 2-stage tissue expander techniques continue to be the procedure most often performed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate postoperative infections and to identify associated predictors.
A retrospective study at Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital was conducted between 2013 and 2017. Patients' demographic data were compared between single-stage and 2-stage procedures. Rate of infection and predictors were examined. Minor infections could be treated by oral antibiotics only, major infections required inpatient treatment. Healing was considered a successful treatment with antibiotics only, whereas any supplementary surgical intervention resulting in the preservation of an implant device was considered salvage. Breast reconstruction was defined a failure in case of implant loss or need for autologous reconstruction.
Three hundred ninety-three patients underwent 336 monolateral and 57 bilateral implant-based breast reconstruction. Ninety-two patients had a submuscular direct-to-implant reconstruction with ADM with an infection rate of 11.4% compared with an infection rate of 7.8% among the 268 patients with a 2-stage tissue expander procedure. Beta-binomial regression showed obesity and preoperative radiotherapy as significant predictors for infection (OR, 4.65, = 0.038, and OR, 7.13, = 0.015, respectively). Average time of onset of infection among the submuscular direct-to-implant with ADM group was 67.1 days compared with 80.1 days among tissue-expander group with postoperative chemotherapy and preoperative radiotherapy having a significant effect on time of infection onset ( = 0.014, = 0.034, respectively).
Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with ADM is a procedure with acceptable risks of infection in comparison to tissue expander procedures. A profound patient selection pre- and intraoperatively is the basis of successful breast reconstruction.
感染风险一直是基于植入物的乳房重建领域讨论的话题。研究表明了使用脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)进行即刻单阶段手术的可行性,但两阶段组织扩张器技术仍然是最常施行的手术方式。本研究的目的是评估术后感染情况并确定相关预测因素。
在帕帕·乔瓦尼二十三世医院进行了一项2013年至2017年的回顾性研究。比较了单阶段和两阶段手术患者的人口统计学数据。检查了感染率和预测因素。轻度感染仅用口服抗生素治疗,重度感染需要住院治疗。仅用抗生素治疗愈合被视为成功治疗,而任何导致植入装置得以保留的补充性手术干预被视为挽救治疗。如果出现植入物丢失或需要自体重建,则乳房重建被定义为失败。
393例患者接受了336例单侧和57例双侧基于植入物的乳房重建。92例患者采用带ADM的肌下直接植入重建,感染率为11.4%,相比之下,268例采用两阶段组织扩张器手术的患者感染率为7.8%。贝塔二项式回归显示肥胖和术前放疗是感染的显著预测因素(OR分别为4.65,P = 0.038,以及OR为7.13,P = 0.015)。带ADM的肌下直接植入组的平均感染发生时间为67.1天,而组织扩张器组为80.1天,术后化疗和术前放疗对感染发生时间有显著影响(P分别为0.014,P = 0.034)。
与组织扩张器手术相比,带ADM的直接植入式乳房重建是一种感染风险可接受的手术方式。术前和术中进行严格的患者选择是成功进行乳房重建的基础。