• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用棘突劈开法的扩展性悬吊椎板成形术治疗腰椎管狭窄症:手术技术及8年随访结果

Expansive Suspension Laminoplasty Using a Spinous Process-Splitting Approach for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Surgical Technique and Outcomes Over 8 Years of Follow-up.

作者信息

Kakiuchi Masaaki, Wada Eiji, Harada Takeo, Ito Kazuya, Fukushima Wakaba

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Iseikai Hospital, Sugahara, Higashiyodogawa-ku, Osaka, Japan (Dr. Kakiuchi); the Spine and Spinal Cord Center, Osaka Police Hospital, Kitayama-cho, Tennoji-ku, Osaka, Japan (Dr. Wada); the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, North Osaka Police Hospital, Muroyama, Ibaraki-shi, Osaka, Japan (Dr. Harada); and the Department of Public Health, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, Japan (Mr. Ito and Dr. Fukushima).

出版信息

J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018 Oct 10;2(10):e008. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-18-00008. eCollection 2018 Oct.

DOI:10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-18-00008
PMID:30656246
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6324890/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To maximize the benefits of posterior decompression for severe multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis, we refined the expansive laminoplasty technique using a spinous process-splitting approach. This study tests the hypothesis that the surgical benefit of adequate decompression with posterior element preservation is maintained in the long term, over 8 years of follow-up.

METHODS

Fifty-eight patients were followed up yearly for 8 years. Eight patients having nonlumbar spine surgery or Parkinson disease were excluded. The noninferiority of the 8-year versus peak-year outcomes was tested, with margins of 5 points for the Oswestry disability index and 1 point for the numeric rating scales (NRSs).

RESULTS

In the 50 patients available for follow-up, the peak values of the mean improvements from baseline within the first 7 years were 35.8, 5.7, 5.9, and 2.8 points for the Oswestry disability index, low back pain NRS, leg pain NRS, and leg numbness NRS, respectively. The 95% lower confidence limits for the differences between the mean improvements from baseline at 8 years and the peak year were within the noninferiority margins for each scale.

CONCLUSION

Our technique was associated with substantial improvement from baseline for each scale. The initial improvements in function and symptoms were maintained for 8 years.

摘要

引言

为了最大限度地提高后路减压治疗严重多节段腰椎管狭窄症的疗效,我们采用棘突劈开法改进了扩大椎板成形术技术。本研究检验了这样一个假设,即在超过8年的随访期内,后路减压并保留后部结构的手术益处能够长期维持。

方法

58例患者接受了为期8年的每年一次的随访。8例接受非腰椎手术或患有帕金森病的患者被排除。对8年与峰值年结果的非劣效性进行了检验,Oswestry功能障碍指数的差值为5分,数字评定量表(NRS)的差值为1分。

结果

在可进行随访的50例患者中,前7年内相对于基线水平平均改善的峰值,Oswestry功能障碍指数为35.8分,下腰痛NRS为5.7分,腿痛NRS为5.9分,腿麻木NRS为2.8分。8年相对于基线水平平均改善与峰值年之间差异的95%置信下限在各量表的非劣效性边界内。

结论

我们的技术使各量表相对于基线水平有显著改善。功能和症状的初始改善在8年内得以维持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00db/6324890/8a5abc1581a4/jagrr-2-e008-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00db/6324890/9014f7e77195/jagrr-2-e008-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00db/6324890/adf4996a388d/jagrr-2-e008-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00db/6324890/8a5abc1581a4/jagrr-2-e008-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00db/6324890/9014f7e77195/jagrr-2-e008-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00db/6324890/adf4996a388d/jagrr-2-e008-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00db/6324890/8a5abc1581a4/jagrr-2-e008-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Expansive Suspension Laminoplasty Using a Spinous Process-Splitting Approach for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Surgical Technique and Outcomes Over 8 Years of Follow-up.采用棘突劈开法的扩展性悬吊椎板成形术治疗腰椎管狭窄症:手术技术及8年随访结果
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018 Oct 10;2(10):e008. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-18-00008. eCollection 2018 Oct.
2
Impact of Spinous Process Integrity on Ten to Twelve-Year Outcomes After Posterior Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Study of Open-Door Laminoplasty Using a Spinous Process-Splitting Approach.后路减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症术后 10 至 12 年随访中棘突完整性的影响:采用棘突劈开式开门椎管扩大成形术的研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Oct 21;97(20):1667-77. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01370.
3
Lumbar Spinous Process-Splitting Laminoplasty: A Novel Technique for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.腰椎棘突劈开椎板成形术:一种微创腰椎减压的新技术。
Orthopedics. 2016 Sep 1;39(5):e950-6. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20160616-03. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
4
A novel lumbar total joint replacement may be an improvement over fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions: a comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes at one year.一种新型腰椎全关节置换术可能优于融合术治疗退行性腰椎疾病:一年时患者报告结局的比较分析。
Spine J. 2021 May;21(5):829-840. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.12.001. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
5
Does surgical technique influence clinical outcome after lumbar spinal stenosis decompression? A comparative effectiveness study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.手术技术会影响腰椎管狭窄减压术后的临床结果吗?来自挪威脊柱外科注册中心的一项比较有效性研究。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Feb;26(2):420-427. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4643-9. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
6
Minimum clinically important difference of major patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.接受减压手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症患者的主要患者报告结局测量指标的最小临床重要差异。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Sep;196:105966. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105966. Epub 2020 May 30.
7
Improvement of Back and Leg Pain after Lumbar Spinal Decompression without Fusion.非融合腰椎减压术后腰腿痛的改善
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2019 Mar;80(2):81-87. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1669473. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
8
Risk factors for persistent numbness following decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄减压术后持续性麻木的危险因素。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Sep;196:105952. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105952. Epub 2020 May 26.
9
A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与单纯减压治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症的对比研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E13. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS18722.
10
Clinical outcomes following sublaminar-trimming laminoplasty for extensive lumbar canal stenosis.广泛腰椎管狭窄症行椎板下减压椎板成形术后的临床疗效
Eur Spine J. 2014 Jan;23(1):80-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2888-0. Epub 2013 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A new surgery choice of bilateral laminoplasty for symptomatic three or more-level lumbar canal stenosis in patients over 60 years old: a two-year retrospective study.60岁以上有症状的三节段及以上腰椎管狭窄症患者双侧椎板成形术的一种新手术选择:一项为期两年的回顾性研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 14;26(1):680. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08940-1.
2
Endoscopic modified total laminoplasty for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.内镜下改良全椎板切除术治疗症状性腰椎管狭窄症。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2022 Jan;45(1):58-64. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2020.1762827. Epub 2020 Jun 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative study of the efficacy of limaprost and pregabalin as single agents and in combination for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.利马前列素与普瑞巴林单药及联合治疗腰椎管狭窄症疗效的比较研究:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照非劣效性试验。
Spine J. 2016 Jun;16(6):756-63. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.02.049. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
2
Impact of Spinous Process Integrity on Ten to Twelve-Year Outcomes After Posterior Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Study of Open-Door Laminoplasty Using a Spinous Process-Splitting Approach.后路减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症术后 10 至 12 年随访中棘突完整性的影响:采用棘突劈开式开门椎管扩大成形术的研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Oct 21;97(20):1667-77. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01370.
3
Long-term outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis: eight-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).腰椎管狭窄症的长期预后:脊柱患者预后研究试验(SPORT)的八年结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jan 15;40(2):63-76. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000731.
4
Comparative study of the treatment outcomes of osteoporotic compression fractures without neurologic injury using a rigid brace, a soft brace, and no brace: a prospective randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.使用刚性支具、软性支具和不使用支具治疗无神经损伤的骨质疏松性压缩骨折的疗效比较研究:一项前瞻性随机对照非劣效性试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Dec 3;96(23):1959-66. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00187.
5
Effect and possible mechanism of muscle-splitting approach on multifidus muscle injury and atrophy after posterior lumbar spine surgery.后路腰椎手术后肌裂入路对多裂肌损伤和萎缩的影响及可能机制。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Dec 18;95(24):e192(1-9). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01607.
6
Lumbar spinous process splitting decompression provides equivalent outcomes to conventional midline decompression in degenerative lumbar canal stenosis: a prospective, randomized controlled study of 51 patients.腰椎棘突劈开减压与传统正中入路减压治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效相当:一项前瞻性随机对照研究,共纳入 51 例患者。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Sep 15;38(20):1737-43. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a056c1.
7
Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.改良 Marmot 手术与棘突横突切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Nov 1;38(23):E1461-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829ff4ae.
8
Reduced postoperative wound pain after lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a randomized controlled study.腰椎管狭窄后路棘突劈开椎管减压术后切口疼痛减轻:一项随机对照研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Jan;14(1):51-8. doi: 10.3171/2010.9.SPINE09933. Epub 2010 Dec 10.
9
Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images.基于磁共振图像硬膜囊形态的腰椎管狭窄严重程度的定性分级。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Oct 1;35(21):1919-24. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d359bd.
10
Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change.解读下腰痛患者疼痛和功能状态的变化分数:迈向关于最小重要变化的国际共识。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 1;33(1):90-4. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10.