Suppr超能文献

年龄、文化程度和种族对儿科肿瘤患者报告结局测量完成情况的影响。

The association of age, literacy, and race on completing patient-reported outcome measures in pediatric oncology.

机构信息

Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, 1520 Clifton Road, NE, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Center for Health Measurement, Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2019 Jul;28(7):1793-1801. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02109-9. Epub 2019 Jan 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Age is often used to determine when children can begin completing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments or transition to adult instruments. This study's purpose was to determine relationships between literacy, age, and race and their influence on a child's ability to understand and complete a PRO instrument.

METHODS

The Wide Range Achievement Test was used to evaluate literacy in children and young adults with cancer, participating in a cognitive interview for the Pediatric PRO-CTCAE instrument. 140 participants (7-20 years) were recruited from 8 sites. Logistic regression and multivariable liner regression were used to examine relationships among key variables.

RESULTS

Higher literacy scores were significantly associated with fewer PRO-CTCAE items being identified as "hard to understand" (p = 0.017). Literacy scores increased with age, but older participants were more likely to fall behind expected reading levels compared with US norms. A 1-year increase in age was associated with a 19% increase in the likelihood for being below the expected WRAT word reading score (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.06-1.33, p = 0.003). No associations were found between race and literacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Wide variations in literacy were noted across age groups. All participants were able to complete the Pediatric PRO-CTCAE, although most 7 year olds (63%) required reading assistance. Those with lower literacy skills were able to understand items suggesting that multiple factors may be involved in comprehension (developmental stage, concentration, vocabulary, or prior health experiences). Risk for falling below expected literacy levels increased with age implying a need for literacy consideration for cancer patients.

摘要

目的

年龄通常用于确定儿童何时可以开始完成患者报告的结局(PRO)工具或过渡到成人工具。本研究的目的是确定读写能力、年龄和种族之间的关系及其对儿童理解和完成 PRO 工具能力的影响。

方法

使用广泛成就测试来评估癌症儿童和青少年的读写能力,他们参与了儿科 PRO-CTCAE 工具的认知访谈。从 8 个地点招募了 140 名参与者(7-20 岁)。逻辑回归和多变量线性回归用于检查关键变量之间的关系。

结果

较高的读写能力得分与较少的 PRO-CTCAE 项目被认为“难以理解”显著相关(p=0.017)。读写能力得分随年龄增长而增加,但与美国标准相比,年龄较大的参与者更有可能落后于预期的阅读水平。年龄增加 1 年与低于预期 WRAT 单词阅读得分的可能性增加 19%(OR 1.19;95%CI 1.06-1.33,p=0.003)相关。种族与读写能力之间没有关联。

结论

在不同的年龄组中注意到读写能力存在很大差异。所有参与者都能够完成儿科 PRO-CTCAE,尽管大多数 7 岁儿童(63%)需要阅读帮助。那些读写能力较低的人能够理解表明理解可能涉及多种因素(发育阶段、注意力、词汇量或先前的健康经验)的项目。随着年龄的增长,读写能力低于预期的风险增加,这意味着癌症患者需要考虑读写能力。

相似文献

1
The association of age, literacy, and race on completing patient-reported outcome measures in pediatric oncology.
Qual Life Res. 2019 Jul;28(7):1793-1801. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02109-9. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
4
Do infant vocabulary skills predict school-age language and literacy outcomes?
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Aug;56(8):848-56. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12378. Epub 2015 Jan 4.
6
Performance of a Brazilian population on the test of functional health literacy in adults.
Rev Saude Publica. 2009 Aug;43(4):631-8. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102009005000031. Epub 2009 May 29.
7
Can Patients and Families Read the Questionnaires for Patient-related Outcome Measures?
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 May/Jun;39(5):e397-e401. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001327.
8
Are patient-reported outcome measures in orthopaedics easily read by patients?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jan;474(1):246-55. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4595-0.
9
Preschool predictors of reading ability in the first year of schooling in children with ASD.
Autism Res. 2018 Oct;11(10):1332-1344. doi: 10.1002/aur.1999. Epub 2018 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Adolescent Involvement in Type 1 Diabetes Treatment: A Scoping Review of Person-Reported Outcome Instruments.
Acta Paediatr. 2025 Oct;114(10):2458-2479. doi: 10.1111/apa.70181. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
2
Agreement and disagreement between child-caregiver symptom and function reports in pediatric oncology.
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2024 Jan;71(1):e30710. doi: 10.1002/pbc.30710. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
6
Who Are We Missing: Does Engagement in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Breast Cancer Vary by Age, Race, or Disease Stage?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;29(13):7964-7973. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12477-1. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
8
Can Steps per Day Reflect Symptoms in Children and Adolescents Undergoing Cancer Treatment?
Cancer Nurs. 2022;45(5):345-353. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000001062. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
9
The predictive trifecta? Fatigue, pain, and anxiety severity forecast the suffering profile of children with cancer.
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Mar;30(3):2081-2089. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06622-x. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
10
Subjective Toxicity Profiles of Children in Treatment for Cancer: A New Guide to Supportive Care?
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Jun;61(6):1188-1195.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.10.017. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

1
A Two Decade Examination of Historical Race/Ethnicity Disparities in Academic Achievement by Poverty Status.
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Jun;47(6):1164-1177. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0800-7. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
2
Child and adolescent self-report symptom measurement in pediatric oncology research: a systematic literature review.
Qual Life Res. 2018 Feb;27(2):291-319. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1692-4. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
3
Affected Aspects Regarding Literacy and Numeracy in Children Treated for Brain Tumors.
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2017 Nov/Dec;34(6):397-405. doi: 10.1177/1043454217717237. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
4
Understanding the school experiences of children and adolescents with serious chronic illness: a systematic meta-review.
Child Care Health Dev. 2017 Sep;43(5):645-662. doi: 10.1111/cch.12475. Epub 2017 May 23.
6
Cancer-related cognitive impairment in children.
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2017 Mar;11(1):70-75. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000258.
7
Symptom Clusters in Children and Adolescents with Cancer.
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2016 Nov;32(4):394-404. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
10
Item-level informant discrepancies between children and their parents on the PROMIS(®) pediatric scales.
Qual Life Res. 2015 Aug;24(8):1921-37. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0914-2. Epub 2015 Jan 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验