Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
The Affiliated Luohu Hospital of Shenzhen University Health Sciences Center, Shenzhen, China.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2019 May;35(4):e3129. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3129. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
To evaluate the association between fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and mortality by gender.
A total of 17 248 eligible participants from a rural Chinese prospective cohort population were included. The same questionnaire interview and anthropometric and laboratory measurements were performed at both baseline (2007-2008) and follow-up (2013-2014). Participants were classified according to baseline FPG and diabetic status by sex. Restricted cubic splines and Cox proportional-hazards regression models, estimating hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), were used to assess the FPG-mortality relation.
During the 6-year follow-up, 618 men and 489 women died. The FPG-mortality relation was J shaped for both sexes. For men, risk of all-cause and noncardiovascular disease (CVD)/noncancer mortality was greater with low fasting glucose (LFG) than with normal fasting glucose (adjusted HR [aHR] 1.60; 95% CI, 1.05-2.43; and aHR 2.16; 95% CI, 1.15-4.05). Men with diabetes mellitus (DM) showed increased risk of all-cause (aHR 2.04; 95% CI, 1.60-2.60), CVD (aHR 1.98; 95% CI, 1.36-2.89), and non-CVD/noncancer mortality (aHR 2.62; 95% CI, 1.76-3.91). Men with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) had borderline risk of CVD mortality (aHR 1.34; 95% CI, 1.00-1.79). Women with LFG had increased risk of non-CVD/noncancer mortality (aHR 2.27; 95% CI, 1.04-4.95), and women with DM had increased risk of all-cause (aHR 1.73; 95% CI, 1.35-2.23), CVD (aHR 1.76; 95% CI, 1.24-2.50), and non-CVD/noncancer mortality (aHR 1.97; 95% CI, 1.27-3.08).
LFG is positively associated with all-cause mortality risk in rural Chinese men but not in women.
评估空腹血糖(FPG)与性别相关的死亡率之间的关联。
共纳入了来自中国农村前瞻性队列人群的 17248 名合格参与者。在基线(2007-2008 年)和随访(2013-2014 年)时均进行了相同的问卷调查访谈和人体测量学及实验室测量。根据基线 FPG 和性别,将参与者分为糖尿病和非糖尿病。使用限制性立方样条和 Cox 比例风险回归模型,估计风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI),评估 FPG-死亡率之间的关系。
在 6 年的随访期间,618 名男性和 489 名女性死亡。男女的 FPG-死亡率关系呈 J 型。对于男性,与正常空腹血糖相比,空腹血糖低(LFG)的全因和非心血管疾病(CVD)/非癌症死亡率风险更高(校正 HR[aHR]1.60;95%CI,1.05-2.43;和 aHR 2.16;95%CI,1.15-4.05)。患有糖尿病(DM)的男性全因(aHR 2.04;95%CI,1.60-2.60)、CVD(aHR 1.98;95%CI,1.36-2.89)和非 CVD/非癌症死亡率(aHR 2.62;95%CI,1.76-3.91)的风险增加。IFG 男性 CVD 死亡率的风险呈边缘增加(aHR 1.34;95%CI,1.00-1.79)。LFG 的女性非 CVD/非癌症死亡率风险增加(aHR 2.27;95%CI,1.04-4.95),DM 女性全因(aHR 1.73;95%CI,1.35-2.23)、CVD(aHR 1.76;95%CI,1.24-2.50)和非 CVD/非癌症死亡率(aHR 1.97;95%CI,1.27-3.08)的风险增加。
在中国农村男性中,LFG 与全因死亡率风险呈正相关,但在女性中则没有。