Diabetes Care. 2003 Mar;26(3):688-96. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.688.
To assess the relation between fasting plasma glucose (FPG) or 2-h plasma glucose (2hPG) and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and non-CVD and to determine whether the relationship is graded or threshold.
Diabetes Epidemiology: Collaborative Analysis Of Diagnostic Criteria in Europe (DECODE) is a collaborative prospective study of 22 cohorts in Europe with baseline glucose measurements for 29714 subjects aged 30-89 years who were followed-up for 11 years (329050 person-years). Hazard ratio (HR) for death was estimated using Cox regression analysis.
High glucose concentrations as well as very low glucose levels were associated with increased risk of death. Compared with an FPG of 4.50-6.09 mmol/l, the multivariate-adjusted HR (95% CI) for FPG <4.50 mmol/l was 1.2 (1.0-1.4) for all-cause, 1.3 (1.0-1.8) for CVD, and 1.1 (0.9-1.4) for non-CVD mortality; the corresponding HRs for diabetes (FPG >or=7.0 mmol/l) were 1.6 (1.4-1.8), 1.6 (1.3-1.9), and 1.6 (1.4-1.9), respectively. For a 2hPG of 3.01-4.50 mmol/l, as compared with a 2hPG of 4.51-5.50 mmol/l, the HRs were 1.1 (1.0-1.2), 1.1 (0.9-1.3), and 1.1 (1.0-1.3), respectively; the corresponding HRs for diabetes (2hPG >or=11.1 mmol/l) were 2.0 (1.7-2.3), 1.9 (1.5-2.4), and 2.1 (1.7-2.5), respectively. The HR for previously undetected diabetes defined by 2hPG was not significantly different from that for known diabetes, which was significantly higher than that for undetected diabetes based on FPG. Subjects with a 2hPG of 10.01-11.09 mmol/l had mortality risks similar to those diabetic subjects defined by an FPG >or=7.0 mmol/l.
The relation between mortality and glucose was J shaped rather than showing threshold effect at high glucose levels, except for CVD mortality and 2hPG, where the relation was graded and increasing.
评估空腹血糖(FPG)或餐后2小时血糖(2hPG)与全因死亡率、心血管疾病(CVD)死亡率及非心血管疾病死亡率之间的关系,并确定这种关系是分级的还是存在阈值。
欧洲糖尿病诊断标准协作分析(DECODE)是一项对欧洲22个队列进行的协作性前瞻性研究,对29714名年龄在30 - 89岁的受试者进行了基线血糖测量,并随访11年(329050人年)。使用Cox回归分析估计死亡风险比(HR)。
高血糖浓度以及极低血糖水平均与死亡风险增加相关。与FPG为4.50 - 6.09 mmol/l相比,FPG <4.50 mmol/l时,全因死亡的多变量调整HR(95%CI)为1.2(1.0 - 1.4),CVD死亡为1.3(1.0 - 1.8),非CVD死亡为1.1(0.9 - 1.4);糖尿病(FPG≥7.0 mmol/l)时相应的HR分别为1.6(1.4 - 1.8)、1.6(1.3 - 1.9)和1.6(1.4 - 1.9)。对于2hPG为3.01 - 4.50 mmol/l,与2hPG为4.51 - 5.50 mmol/l相比,HR分别为1.1(1.0 - 1.2)、1.1(0.9 - 1.3)和1.1(1.0 - 1.3);糖尿病(2hPG≥11.1 mmol/l)时相应的HR分别为2.0(1.7 - 2.3)、1.9(1.5 - 2.4)和2.1(1.7 - 2.5)。由2hPG定义的既往未检测出的糖尿病的HR与已知糖尿病的HR无显著差异,已知糖尿病的HR显著高于基于FPG未检测出的糖尿病的HR。2hPG为10.01 - 11.09 mmol/l的受试者的死亡风险与FPG≥7.0 mmol/l定义的糖尿病受试者相似。
死亡率与血糖之间的关系呈J形,而非在高血糖水平表现出阈值效应,但CVD死亡率和2hPG除外,其关系是分级且呈上升趋势的。