Wang Linan, Zhang Wei, Dai Juan, Deng Qing, Yan Yaqiong, Liu Qing
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
The Wuhan Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China.
J Diabetes Investig. 2024 Aug;15(8):1129-1139. doi: 10.1111/jdi.14196. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to investigate the optimal fasting glucose (FPG) range in Chinese older adults with type 2 diabetes, and to clarify whether the optimal range varies according to the control of risk factors.
The baseline survey for the cohort study began in 2018, with follow up ending in 2022. Our study enrolled 59,030 older diabetes patients with no history of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Participants were divided into nine groups based on their baseline glycemic status. The association between FPG and the risk of adverse outcomes was mainly estimated by multivariate Cox proportional risk models and restricted spline analysis.
During the 4-year follow-up period, a total of 5,637 deaths and 4,904 CVD events occurred. The associations of FPG with mortality and CVD events showed J-shaped curves. Among all-cause deaths, the hazard ratios for FPG ≤4.50 and >11.50 mmol/L were 1.50 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-1.71) and 1.84 (95% CI 1.67-2.02). Among CVD, the hazard ratios for FPG ≤4.50 and >11.50 mmol/L were 1.31 (95% CI 1.13-1.53) and 1.71 (95% CI 1.54-1.89), respectively. The optimal FPG ranges of all-cause mortality and CVD were 5.50-7.50 and 4.50-7.50 mmol/L, respectively. For participants with at least two risk factors, the optimal FPG levels were higher than those with fewer risk factors.
In older Chinese diabetes patients, the FPG ranges related to the minimum death and CVD event rates were 5.50-7.50 and 4.50-7.50 mmol/L, respectively. Patients with more cardiovascular risk factors had higher optimal blood glucose ranges than those with fewer risk factors.
目的/引言:我们的目的是研究中国老年2型糖尿病患者的最佳空腹血糖(FPG)范围,并阐明最佳范围是否因危险因素的控制情况而有所不同。
队列研究的基线调查始于2018年,随访于2022年结束。我们的研究纳入了59030例无心血管疾病(CVD)病史的老年糖尿病患者。参与者根据其基线血糖状态分为九组。FPG与不良结局风险之间的关联主要通过多变量Cox比例风险模型和限制性样条分析进行评估。
在4年的随访期内,共发生5637例死亡和4904例CVD事件。FPG与死亡率和CVD事件的关联呈J形曲线。在全因死亡中,FPG≤4.50和>11.50 mmol/L的风险比分别为1.50(95%置信区间[CI] 1.31-1.71)和1.84(95% CI 1.67-2.02)。在CVD方面,FPG≤4.50和>11.50 mmol/L的风险比分别为1.31(95% CI 1.13-1.53)和1.71(95% CI 1.54-1.89)。全因死亡率和CVD的最佳FPG范围分别为5.50-7.50和4.50-7.50 mmol/L。对于至少有两个危险因素的参与者,最佳FPG水平高于危险因素较少的参与者。
在中国老年糖尿病患者中,与最低死亡率和CVD事件发生率相关的FPG范围分别为5.50-7.50和4.50-7.50 mmol/L。心血管危险因素较多的患者的最佳血糖范围高于危险因素较少的患者。