Suppr超能文献

胫骨安装的惯性测量单元在量化精英足球运动员跑步动力学方面的价值。一项使用研究型和临床型系统的可靠性与一致性研究。

The value of tibial mounted inertial measurement units to quantify running kinetics in elite football (soccer) players. A reliability and agreement study using a research orientated and a clinically orientated system.

作者信息

Hughes Tom, Jones Richard K, Starbuck Chelsea, Sergeant Jamie C, Callaghan Michael J

机构信息

Manchester United Football Club, AON Training Complex, Carrington, Manchester, UK; Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Health Sciences Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, UK.

出版信息

J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2019 Feb;44:156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

Abstract

In elite football, measurement of running kinetics with inertial measurement units (IMUs) may be useful as a component of periodic health examination (PHE). This study determined the reliability of, and agreement between a research orientated IMU and clinically orientated IMU system for initial peak acceleration (IPA) and IPA symmetry index (SI) measurement during running in elite footballers. On consecutive days, 16 participants performed treadmill running at 14kmph and 18kmph. Both IMUs measured IPA and IPA SI concurrently. All measurements had good or excellent within-session reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) range = 0.79-0.96, IPA standard error of measurement (SEM) range = 0.19-0.62 g, IPA SI SEM range = 2.50-8.05%). Only the research orientated IMU demonstrated acceptable minimal detectable changes (MDCs) for IPA at 14kmph (range = 7.46-9.80%) and IPA SI at both speeds (range = 6.92-9.21%). Considering both systems, between-session IPA reliability ranged from fair to good (ICC range = 0.63-0.87, SEM range = 0.51-1.10 g) and poor to fair for IPA SI (ICC range = 0.32-0.65, SEM range = 8.07-11.18%). All MDCs were >10%. For IPA and SI, the 95% levels of agreement indicated poor between system agreement. Therefore, the use of IMUs to evaluate treadmill running kinetics cannot be recommended in this population as a PHE test to identify prognostic factors for injuries or for rehabilitation purposes.

摘要

在精英足球运动中,使用惯性测量单元(IMU)测量跑步动力学参数可能作为定期健康检查(PHE)的一部分而有用。本研究确定了用于测量精英足球运动员跑步过程中初始峰值加速度(IPA)和IPA对称指数(SI)的研究型IMU与临床型IMU系统之间的可靠性及一致性。连续两天,16名参与者以14公里/小时和18公里/小时的速度在跑步机上跑步。两个IMU同时测量IPA和IPA SI。所有测量的组内可靠性良好或优异(组内相关系数(ICC)范围 = 0.79 - 0.96,IPA测量标准误(SEM)范围 = 0.19 - 0.62 g,IPA SI SEM范围 = 2.50 - 8.05%)。只有研究型IMU在14公里/小时时对IPA以及在两种速度下对IPA SI显示出可接受的最小可检测变化(MDC)(范围 = 7.46 - 9.80%和6.92 - 9.21%)。综合考虑两个系统,组间IPA可靠性从中等到良好(ICC范围 = 0.63 - 0.87,SEM范围 = 0.51 - 1.10 g),而IPA SI的组间可靠性则从差到中等(ICC范围 = 0.32 - 0.65,SEM范围 = 8.07 - 11.18%)。所有MDC均>10%。对于IPA和SI,95%的一致性水平表明系统间一致性较差。因此,不建议在该人群中使用IMU来评估跑步机跑步动力学参数作为PHE测试,以识别损伤的预后因素或用于康复目的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df4d/6350007/81a1ee358d2c/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验