Hughes Tom, Jones Richard K, Starbuck Chelsea, Sergeant Jamie C, Callaghan Michael J
Manchester United Football Club, AON Training Complex, Carrington, Manchester, UK; Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Health Sciences Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, UK.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2019 Feb;44:156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
In elite football, measurement of running kinetics with inertial measurement units (IMUs) may be useful as a component of periodic health examination (PHE). This study determined the reliability of, and agreement between a research orientated IMU and clinically orientated IMU system for initial peak acceleration (IPA) and IPA symmetry index (SI) measurement during running in elite footballers. On consecutive days, 16 participants performed treadmill running at 14kmph and 18kmph. Both IMUs measured IPA and IPA SI concurrently. All measurements had good or excellent within-session reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) range = 0.79-0.96, IPA standard error of measurement (SEM) range = 0.19-0.62 g, IPA SI SEM range = 2.50-8.05%). Only the research orientated IMU demonstrated acceptable minimal detectable changes (MDCs) for IPA at 14kmph (range = 7.46-9.80%) and IPA SI at both speeds (range = 6.92-9.21%). Considering both systems, between-session IPA reliability ranged from fair to good (ICC range = 0.63-0.87, SEM range = 0.51-1.10 g) and poor to fair for IPA SI (ICC range = 0.32-0.65, SEM range = 8.07-11.18%). All MDCs were >10%. For IPA and SI, the 95% levels of agreement indicated poor between system agreement. Therefore, the use of IMUs to evaluate treadmill running kinetics cannot be recommended in this population as a PHE test to identify prognostic factors for injuries or for rehabilitation purposes.
在精英足球运动中,使用惯性测量单元(IMU)测量跑步动力学参数可能作为定期健康检查(PHE)的一部分而有用。本研究确定了用于测量精英足球运动员跑步过程中初始峰值加速度(IPA)和IPA对称指数(SI)的研究型IMU与临床型IMU系统之间的可靠性及一致性。连续两天,16名参与者以14公里/小时和18公里/小时的速度在跑步机上跑步。两个IMU同时测量IPA和IPA SI。所有测量的组内可靠性良好或优异(组内相关系数(ICC)范围 = 0.79 - 0.96,IPA测量标准误(SEM)范围 = 0.19 - 0.62 g,IPA SI SEM范围 = 2.50 - 8.05%)。只有研究型IMU在14公里/小时时对IPA以及在两种速度下对IPA SI显示出可接受的最小可检测变化(MDC)(范围 = 7.46 - 9.80%和6.92 - 9.21%)。综合考虑两个系统,组间IPA可靠性从中等到良好(ICC范围 = 0.63 - 0.87,SEM范围 = 0.51 - 1.10 g),而IPA SI的组间可靠性则从差到中等(ICC范围 = 0.32 - 0.65,SEM范围 = 8.07 - 11.18%)。所有MDC均>10%。对于IPA和SI,95%的一致性水平表明系统间一致性较差。因此,不建议在该人群中使用IMU来评估跑步机跑步动力学参数作为PHE测试,以识别损伤的预后因素或用于康复目的。