Gait & Motion Analysis Laboratory, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Gait & Motion Analysis Laboratory, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Gait Posture. 2019 Mar;69:8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
Previous peak tibial shock gait retraining programs, which were usually conducted on a treadmill, were reported to be effective on impact loading reduction in runners. However, whether the trained runners can translate the training effect at different running modes (treadmill/overground), or running slopes (uphill/downhill), remains unknown.
Is the training effect from a treadmill-based gait retraining translatable to unconstrained running conditions, including overground and uphill/downhill running?
The peak tibial shock was measured during treadmill/overground running, as well as level/uphill/downhill running before and after a course of treadmill-based gait retraining. The 8-session training aimed to soften footfalls using real-time biofeedback of tibial shock data. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to examine the effect of training, running mode, and running slope, on a group level. Reliable change index of each participant was used to assess the individual response to the training protocol used in this study.
Eighty percent of the participants were responsive to the gait retraining and managed to reduce their peak tibial shock following training. They managed to translate the training effect to treadmill slope running (Level: p < 0.05, Cohen's d = 1.65; Uphill: p = 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.91; Downhill: p < 0.05; Cohen's d = 1.29) and overground level running (p = 0.014, Cohen's d = 0.85). However, their peak tibial shock were not reduced during overground slope running (Uphill: p = 0.054; Cohen's d = 0.62; Downhill p = 0.12; Cohen's d = 0.48).
Our findings indicated that a newly learned gait pattern may not fully translate to running outside of the laboratory environment.
之前在跑步机上进行的峰值胫骨冲击步态再训练计划被报道可有效降低跑步者的冲击负荷。然而,训练后的跑步者是否能够将训练效果转化为不同的跑步模式(跑步机/地面)或跑步坡度(上坡/下坡),目前尚不清楚。
基于跑步机的步态再训练的训练效果是否可以转化为不受约束的跑步条件,包括地面跑步和上坡/下坡跑步?
在跑步机/地面跑步以及水平/上坡/下坡跑步之前和之后,测量峰值胫骨冲击。8 节课程的训练旨在使用胫骨冲击数据的实时生物反馈来软化脚步。使用重复测量方差分析在组水平上检查训练、跑步模式和跑步坡度的效果。使用每个参与者的可靠变化指数评估个体对本研究中使用的训练方案的反应。
80%的参与者对步态再训练有反应,并在训练后成功降低了峰值胫骨冲击。他们设法将训练效果转化为跑步机坡度跑步(水平:p<0.05,Cohen's d=1.65;上坡:p=0.001,Cohen's d=0.91;下坡:p<0.05;Cohen's d=1.29)和地面水平跑步(p=0.014,Cohen's d=0.85)。然而,他们在地面坡度跑步时的峰值胫骨冲击并没有降低(上坡:p=0.054;Cohen's d=0.62;下坡:p=0.12;Cohen's d=0.48)。
我们的发现表明,新习得的步态模式可能无法完全转化为实验室环境之外的跑步。