Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉旁路移植术后氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛用于二级预防的比较

Clopidogrel versus Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

作者信息

Chang Hyoung Woo, Kim Hee Jung, Yoo Jae Suk, Kim Dong Jin, Cho Kwang Ree

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do 13620, Korea.

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Sejong General Hospital, Gyeonggi-do 14754, Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2019 Jan 17;8(1):104. doi: 10.3390/jcm8010104.

Abstract

We sought to evaluate the outcomes of postoperative three-month dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) following off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) with exclusively arterial grafts. Between 2013⁻2016, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with either aspirin + clopidogrel (ASA + CPD group, = 100) or aspirin + ticagrelor (ASA + TCG group, = 169) was prescribed postoperatively in 269 NSTE-ACS patients after total arterial OPCAB. Patients with indications for other oral anticoagulants were excluded from the study. Three-month DAPT was completed in 259 patients (96%); ASA + CPD group ( = 94) vs. ASA + TCG group ( = 165). A one-to-one propensity score matching was performed. Unadjusted comparison between the groups showed no significant difference in overall survival ( = 0.253) and composite outcome of major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiovascular event (MACCE) and major bleeding ( = 0.276). The rate of freedom from composite outcome at one year in the ASA + CPD and ASA + TCG groups was 91 ± 3% and 93 ± 2%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, being in the ASA + TCG group did not increase the risk of the composite outcome of MACCE and major bleeding ( = 0.972, hazard ratio: 1.0, 95% confidence interval: 0.4⁻2.3). Propensity score-matched comparison (76 pairs) showed no significant difference in the overall survival ( = 0.423) and composite outcome between the groups ( = 0.442). In the setting of exclusive arterial grafting, post-OPCAB three-month DAPT showed acceptable outcomes in patients with NSTE-ACS. There was no significant difference in overall survival or composite outcome of MACCE and major bleeding between the ASA + CPD and ASA + TCG groups.

摘要

我们旨在评估非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者在采用全动脉化非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCAB)后接受术后三个月双重抗血小板治疗的效果。在2013年至2016年期间,269例接受全动脉化OPCAB的NSTE-ACS患者术后接受了阿司匹林+氯吡格雷双重抗血小板治疗(ASA + CPD组,n = 100)或阿司匹林+替格瑞洛双重抗血小板治疗(ASA + TCG组,n = 169)。有其他口服抗凝剂指征的患者被排除在研究之外。259例患者(96%)完成了三个月的双重抗血小板治疗;ASA + CPD组(n = 94)与ASA + TCG组(n = 165)。进行了一对一的倾向评分匹配。组间未调整比较显示,总体生存率(P = 0.253)以及主要不良脑血管和心血管事件(MACCE)与大出血的复合结局(P = 0.276)无显著差异。ASA + CPD组和ASA + TCG组一年时无复合结局的发生率分别为91±3%和93±2%。在多变量分析中,处于ASA + TCG组并未增加MACCE与大出血复合结局的风险(P = 0.972,风险比:1.0,95%置信区间:0.4至2.3)。倾向评分匹配比较(76对)显示,组间总体生存率(P = 0.423)和复合结局(P = 0.442)无显著差异。在全动脉搭桥的情况下,OPCAB术后三个月双重抗血小板治疗在NSTE-ACS患者中显示出可接受的效果。ASA + CPD组和ASA + TCG组在总体生存率或MACCE与大出血复合结局方面无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dac4/6352018/19e33d4f9fac/jcm-08-00104-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验