Varma Praveen Kerala, Ahmed Hisham, Krishna Neethu, Jose Rajesh, Gopal Kirun, Mathew Oommen Plavannal, Jayant Aveek
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Viswa Vidyapeetham (Amrita University), Kochi, India.
Department of Cardiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Viswa Vidyapeetham (Amrita University), Kochi, India.
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Jan;37(1):27-37. doi: 10.1007/s12055-020-01052-6. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
Ticagrelor combined with aspirin had shown better saphenous vein graft patency than aspirin with clopidogrel after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. However, the safety of this drug in regard to bleeding complications remains unknown. The aim of our study was to assess the bleeding complications of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ticagrelor compared with aspirin and clopidogrel within the first 3 months after off-pump surgery.
Three hundred eighty-two consecutive patients who were prescribed aspirin with ticagrelor (ticagrelor group) were compared with 660 patients who received aspirin and clopidogrel (clopidogrel group). After propensity matching, 144 patients in each group were compared for bleeding events and major adverse cardiac and cerebral events. Major bleeding was defined as composite outcome of re-exploration for bleeding, any fatal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and any bleeding requiring hospitalization.
Patients in the ticagrelor group had more incidence of re-exploration for bleeding ( = 0.042), pericardial effusion requiring drainage ( = 0.007), readmissions ( < 0.01), gastrointestinal bleeding ( = 0.01), and major bleeding (5.8% vs. 2.1%, < 0.01, OR 2.8 (1.43-5.58)). After propensity analysis, gastrointestinal bleed ( = 0.024), major bleeding (7.6% vs.1.4%, < 0.001, OR 5.8 (1.28-26.97)), length of ICU stay ( = 0.039), and readmissions ( = 0.003, OR 11.83 (1.51-92.86)) were more in the ticagrelor group. Major adverse cardiac and cerebral events were similar between the groups.
Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ticagrelor increased gastrointestinal bleeding events, major bleeding events, and readmission rates compared with aspirin and clopidogrel after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
在非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术后,替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林在隐静脉桥血管通畅方面比氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林表现更佳。然而,这种药物在出血并发症方面的安全性仍不明确。我们研究的目的是评估非体外循环手术后前3个月内,阿司匹林与替格瑞洛双联抗血小板治疗与阿司匹林和氯吡格雷相比的出血并发症情况。
将连续382例接受阿司匹林联合替格瑞洛治疗的患者(替格瑞洛组)与660例接受阿司匹林和氯吡格雷治疗的患者(氯吡格雷组)进行比较。在倾向评分匹配后,比较每组144例患者的出血事件及主要不良心脑血管事件。严重出血定义为因出血再次手术、任何致命性出血、颅内出血以及任何需要住院治疗的出血的复合结局。
替格瑞洛组患者因出血再次手术的发生率更高(P = 0.042)、需要引流的心包积液发生率更高(P = 0.007)、再次入院率更高(P < 0.01)、胃肠道出血发生率更高(P = 0.01)以及严重出血发生率更高(5.8% 对 2.1%,P < 0.01,比值比2.8(1.43 - 5.58))。倾向分析后,替格瑞洛组胃肠道出血(P = 0.024)、严重出血(7.6% 对1.4%,P < 0.001,比值比5.8(1.28 - 26.97))、重症监护病房住院时间更长(P = 0.039)以及再次入院率更高(P = 0.003,比值比11.83(1.51 - 92.86))。两组间主要不良心脑血管事件相似。
非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术后,与阿司匹林和氯吡格雷相比,阿司匹林与替格瑞洛双联抗血小板治疗增加了胃肠道出血事件、严重出血事件及再次入院率。