Suppr超能文献

替格瑞洛双联抗血小板治疗与氯吡格雷双联抗血小板治疗后的出血并发症——非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术中两种抗血小板方案的倾向匹配比较研究

Bleeding complications after dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor versus dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel-a propensity-matched comparative study of two antiplatelet regimes in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

作者信息

Varma Praveen Kerala, Ahmed Hisham, Krishna Neethu, Jose Rajesh, Gopal Kirun, Mathew Oommen Plavannal, Jayant Aveek

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Viswa Vidyapeetham (Amrita University), Kochi, India.

Department of Cardiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Viswa Vidyapeetham (Amrita University), Kochi, India.

出版信息

Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Jan;37(1):27-37. doi: 10.1007/s12055-020-01052-6. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Ticagrelor combined with aspirin had shown better saphenous vein graft patency than aspirin with clopidogrel after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. However, the safety of this drug in regard to bleeding complications remains unknown. The aim of our study was to assess the bleeding complications of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ticagrelor compared with aspirin and clopidogrel within the first 3 months after off-pump surgery.

METHODS

Three hundred eighty-two consecutive patients who were prescribed aspirin with ticagrelor (ticagrelor group) were compared with 660 patients who received aspirin and clopidogrel (clopidogrel group). After propensity matching, 144 patients in each group were compared for bleeding events and major adverse cardiac and cerebral events. Major bleeding was defined as composite outcome of re-exploration for bleeding, any fatal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and any bleeding requiring hospitalization.

RESULTS

Patients in the ticagrelor group had more incidence of re-exploration for bleeding ( = 0.042), pericardial effusion requiring drainage ( = 0.007), readmissions ( < 0.01), gastrointestinal bleeding ( = 0.01), and major bleeding (5.8% vs. 2.1%,  < 0.01, OR 2.8 (1.43-5.58)). After propensity analysis, gastrointestinal bleed ( = 0.024), major bleeding (7.6% vs.1.4%,  < 0.001, OR 5.8 (1.28-26.97)), length of ICU stay ( = 0.039), and readmissions ( = 0.003, OR 11.83 (1.51-92.86)) were more in the ticagrelor group. Major adverse cardiac and cerebral events were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ticagrelor increased gastrointestinal bleeding events, major bleeding events, and readmission rates compared with aspirin and clopidogrel after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

摘要

目的

在非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术后,替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林在隐静脉桥血管通畅方面比氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林表现更佳。然而,这种药物在出血并发症方面的安全性仍不明确。我们研究的目的是评估非体外循环手术后前3个月内,阿司匹林与替格瑞洛双联抗血小板治疗与阿司匹林和氯吡格雷相比的出血并发症情况。

方法

将连续382例接受阿司匹林联合替格瑞洛治疗的患者(替格瑞洛组)与660例接受阿司匹林和氯吡格雷治疗的患者(氯吡格雷组)进行比较。在倾向评分匹配后,比较每组144例患者的出血事件及主要不良心脑血管事件。严重出血定义为因出血再次手术、任何致命性出血、颅内出血以及任何需要住院治疗的出血的复合结局。

结果

替格瑞洛组患者因出血再次手术的发生率更高(P = 0.042)、需要引流的心包积液发生率更高(P = 0.007)、再次入院率更高(P < 0.01)、胃肠道出血发生率更高(P = 0.01)以及严重出血发生率更高(5.8% 对 2.1%,P < 0.01,比值比2.8(1.43 - 5.58))。倾向分析后,替格瑞洛组胃肠道出血(P = 0.024)、严重出血(7.6% 对1.4%,P < 0.001,比值比5.8(1.28 - 26.97))、重症监护病房住院时间更长(P = 0.039)以及再次入院率更高(P = 0.003,比值比11.83(1.51 - 92.86))。两组间主要不良心脑血管事件相似。

结论

非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术后,与阿司匹林和氯吡格雷相比,阿司匹林与替格瑞洛双联抗血小板治疗增加了胃肠道出血事件、严重出血事件及再次入院率。

相似文献

2
Preoperative treatment with clopidogrel and ticagrelor on bleeding complications in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
Thromb Res. 2022 Nov;219:70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2022.09.010. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
4
Coronary artery bypass grafting-related bleeding complications in real-life acute coronary syndrome patients treated with clopidogrel or ticagrelor.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Oct;46(4):699-705; discussion 705. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt662. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
9
Antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A single-center randomized controlled trial.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Aug;158(2):430-437.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.032. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
10
Major Bleeding after Surgical Revascularization with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Dec;68(8):714-722. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1710508. Epub 2020 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal dual antiplatelet therapy for coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis. 2025 Mar 20;10:e16-e27. doi: 10.5114/amsad/202297. eCollection 2025.
2
Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 May 8;12:1542437. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1542437. eCollection 2025.
3
The Effect of Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients on Aspirin Therapy until Surgery Day.
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Jul 8;2022:8674401. doi: 10.1155/2022/8674401. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Early outcomes in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Apr;35(2):168-174. doi: 10.1007/s12055-018-0730-3. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
4
Antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A single-center randomized controlled trial.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Aug;158(2):430-437.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.032. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
5
Doubling up on antiplatelet therapy after CABG: changing practice ASAP after DACAB?
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Sep;10(Suppl 26):S3095-S3099. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.07.37.
7
Is administration of dual-antiplatelet therapy beneficial for patients following off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018 Oct 1;27(4):548-554. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivy113.
8
Ticagrelor - toward more efficient platelet inhibition and beyond.
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018 Jan 17;14:129-140. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S152369. eCollection 2018.
10
Dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease.
Open Heart. 2017 Oct 15;4(2):e000651. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000651. eCollection 2017.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验