• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人乳头瘤病毒检测在自我采集样本与临床医生采集样本中的应用性能,用于检测 2 级或更高级别的宫颈上皮内瘤变:一项随机、配对、阳性筛选、非劣效性试验。

Performance of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse: a randomised, paired screen-positive, non-inferiority trial.

机构信息

Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2019 Feb;20(2):229-238. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30763-0. Epub 2019 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30763-0
PMID:30658933
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on self-collected samples is a potential alternative to HPV testing on clinician-collected samples, but non-inferiority of its clinical accuracy remains to be assessed in the regular screening population. The IMPROVE study was done to evaluate the clinical accuracy of primary HPV testing on self-collected samples within an organised screening setting.

METHODS

In this randomised, non-inferiority trial, women aged 29-61 years were invited to participate in the study as part of their regular screening invitation in the Netherlands. Women who provided informed consent were randomly allocated (1:1, with a block size of ten stratified by age) to one of two groups: a self-sampling group, in which women were requested to collect their own cervicovaginal sample using an Evalyn Brush (Rovers Medical Devices BV, Oss, Netherlands); or a clinician-based sampling group, in which samples were collected by a general practitioner with a Cervex-Brush (Rovers Medical Devices BV). All samples were tested for HPV using the clinically validated GP5+/6+ PCR enzyme immunoassay (Labo Biomedical Products BV, Rijswijk, Netherlands). HPV-positive women in both groups were retested with the other collection method and triaged by cytology and repeat cytology in accordance with current Dutch screening guidelines. Primary endpoints were detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) of grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) and grade 3 or worse (CIN3+). Non-inferiority of HPV testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples was evaluated against a margin of 90% for the relative sensitivity and 98% for the relative specificity. This study is registered at the Dutch Trial register (NTR5078) and has been completed.

FINDINGS

Of the 187 473 women invited to participate, 8212 were randomly allocated to the self-sampling group and 8198 to the clinician-based sampling group. After exclusion of women who met the exclusion criteria or who did not return their sample, 7643 women were included in the self-sampling group and 6282 in the clinician-based sampling group. 569 (7·4%) self-collected samples and 451 (7·2%) clinician-collected samples tested positive for HPV (relative risk 1·04 [95% CI 0·92-1·17]). Median follow-up duration for HPV-positive women was 20 months (IQR 17-22). The CIN2+ sensitivity and specificity of HPV testing did not differ between self-sampling and clinician-based sampling (relative sensitivity 0·96 [0·90-1·03]; relative specificity 1·00 [0·99-1·01]). For the CIN3+ endpoint, relative sensitivity was 0·99 (0·91-1·08) and relative specificity was 1·00 (0·99-1·01).

INTERPRETATION

HPV testing done with a clinically validated PCR-based assay had similar accuracy on self-collected and clinician-collected samples in terms of the detection of CIN2+ or CIN3+ lesions. These findings suggest that HPV self-sampling could be used as a primary screening method in routine screening.

FUNDING

Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sport (Netherlands), and the European Commission.

摘要

背景

人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)自我采集样本检测可能是临床医生采集样本检测的替代方法,但在常规筛查人群中,其临床准确性的非劣效性仍有待评估。IMPROVE 研究旨在评估在有组织的筛查环境中,自我采集样本进行原发性 HPV 检测的临床准确性。

方法

在这项随机、非劣效性试验中,邀请 29-61 岁的女性参加该研究,作为其在荷兰常规筛查邀请的一部分。提供知情同意的女性被随机分配(1:1,按年龄分层的 10 个区组大小)到两组之一:自我采样组,要求女性使用 Evalyn 刷子(Rovers Medical Devices BV,荷兰 Oss)自行采集宫颈阴道样本;或临床医生采样组,由全科医生使用 Cervex-Brush(Rovers Medical Devices BV)采集样本。所有样本均采用经过临床验证的 GP5+/6+PCR 酶免疫测定法(Labo Biomedical Products BV,荷兰 Rijswijk)进行 HPV 检测。两组中 HPV 阳性的女性均使用另一种采集方法进行重复检测,并根据当前荷兰筛查指南进行细胞学和重复细胞学分类。主要终点是检测到宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)2 级或更高级别(CIN2+)和 3 级或更高级别(CIN3+)。HPV 自我采集样本与临床医生采集样本的检测相对敏感性的 90%和相对特异性的 98%的差值评估为非劣效性。该研究在荷兰试验注册处(NTR5078)注册,并已完成。

结果

在 187473 名受邀参加的女性中,8212 名被随机分配到自我采样组,8198 名被分配到临床医生采样组。排除符合排除标准或未返回样本的女性后,7643 名女性被纳入自我采样组,6282 名女性被纳入临床医生采样组。569 份(7.4%)自我采集样本和 451 份(7.2%)临床医生采集样本 HPV 检测阳性(相对风险 1.04[95%CI 0.92-1.17])。HPV 阳性女性的中位随访时间为 20 个月(IQR 17-22)。HPV 检测在自我采样和临床医生采样组中 CIN2+的敏感性和特异性没有差异(相对敏感性 0.96[0.90-1.03];相对特异性 1.00[0.99-1.01])。对于 CIN3+终点,相对敏感性为 0.99(0.91-1.08),相对特异性为 1.00(0.99-1.01)。

结论

使用经过临床验证的基于 PCR 的 HPV 检测方法,在检测 CIN2+或 CIN3+病变方面,自我采集样本和临床医生采集样本的准确性相似。这些发现表明,HPV 自我采样可作为常规筛查中的一种主要筛查方法。

资助

荷兰卫生、福利和体育部和欧盟委员会。

相似文献

1
Performance of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse: a randomised, paired screen-positive, non-inferiority trial.人乳头瘤病毒检测在自我采集样本与临床医生采集样本中的应用性能,用于检测 2 级或更高级别的宫颈上皮内瘤变:一项随机、配对、阳性筛选、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Feb;20(2):229-238. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30763-0. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
2
Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis.人乳头瘤病毒自我采集与临床医生采集样本检测的准确性:荟萃分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):172-83. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70570-9. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
3
Human papillomavirus testing for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer: final results of the POBASCAM randomised controlled trial.人乳头瘤病毒检测在高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变和宫颈癌筛查中的应用:POBASCAM 随机对照研究的最终结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jan;13(1):78-88. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70296-0. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
4
Triage by methylation-marker testing versus cytology in women who test HPV-positive on self-collected cervicovaginal specimens (PROHTECT-3): a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.基于自行采集的宫颈阴道标本 HPV 阳性女性中应用甲基化标志物检测行分流与细胞学检测的比较(PROHTECT-3):一项随机对照非劣效性试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Mar;15(3):315-22. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70019-1. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
5
High-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in human papillomavirus self-sampling of screening non-attenders.人乳头瘤病毒自我采样筛查不参与者的高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变。
Br J Cancer. 2018 Jan;118(1):138-144. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.371. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
6
Clinical performance of high-risk HPV testing on self-samples versus clinician samples in routine primary HPV screening in the Netherlands: An observational study.荷兰常规初级HPV筛查中高危型HPV自我采样与临床医生采样的临床性能:一项观察性研究。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Nov 9;11:100235. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100235. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
HPV testing in first-void urine provides sensitivity for CIN2+ detection comparable with a smear taken by a clinician or a brush-based self-sample: cross-sectional data from a triage population.在首次排空尿液中进行 HPV 检测对 CIN2+ 的检出灵敏度与临床医生取样或刷子自采样相当:来自分层人群的横断面数据。
BJOG. 2017 Aug;124(9):1356-1363. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14682.
8
Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.25 岁及以上女性宫颈癌筛查中致癌型人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测及 HPV16 或 HPV18 基因分型的性能:ATHENA 研究的一项亚组分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Sep;12(9):880-90. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70188-7. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
9
Urine high-risk human papillomavirus testing as an alternative to routine cervical screening: A comparative diagnostic accuracy study of two urine collection devices using a randomised study design trial.尿液高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测替代常规宫颈筛查:两种尿液采集装置随机研究设计试验的比较诊断准确性研究。
BJOG. 2024 Oct;131(11):1456-1464. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17831. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
10
Predictive Value of HPV Testing in Self-collected and Clinician-Collected Samples Compared with Cytology in Detecting High-grade Cervical Lesions.HPV 检测在自我采集样本和临床医生采集样本与细胞学检测在检测高级别宫颈病变中的预测价值比较。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Jul;28(7):1134-1140. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-1338. Epub 2019 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the role of the oncology nurse in cervical cancer screening programs during times of transition.探索肿瘤护理人员在转型期宫颈癌筛查项目中的作用。
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2025 Jan 1;35(1):223-243. eCollection 2025 Winter.
2
Building the foundations for an organized population-based cervical cancer screening program with primary HPV self-sampling in Catalonia, Spain: findings from a pilot implementation study.在西班牙加泰罗尼亚建立基于人群的有组织宫颈癌筛查计划基础并采用人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)自我采样:一项试点实施研究的结果
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 4;12:1580665. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1580665. eCollection 2025.
3
Feasibility of First-Void Urinary and Vaginal Self-Sampling for High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Testing Among Women Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Guinea-Bissau-A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.
几内亚比绍感染人类免疫缺陷病毒女性首次排尿尿液和阴道自我采样用于高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测的可行性——一项多中心横断面研究
J Med Virol. 2025 Jul;97(7):e70466. doi: 10.1002/jmv.70466.
4
Human papillomavirus infection and screening strategies.人乳头瘤病毒感染与筛查策略
World J Clin Oncol. 2025 May 24;16(5):105055. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i5.105055.
5
Projected health and economic effects of nonavalent versus bivalent human papillomavirus vaccination in preadolescence in the Netherlands.荷兰青春期前接种九价与二价人乳头瘤病毒疫苗对健康和经济的预期影响
BMC Med. 2025 Jun 9;23(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04170-3.
6
Advancing Cervical Cancer Prevention Equity: Innovations in Self-Sampling and Digital Health Technologies Across Healthcare Settings.推进宫颈癌预防公平性:跨医疗保健环境的自我采样和数字健康技术创新
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 May 6;15(9):1176. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15091176.
7
Juntas Contra el Virus del Papiloma Humano: protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial of an HPV self-sampling intervention for underscreened Latinas.联合对抗人乳头瘤病毒:一项针对筛查不足的拉丁裔女性进行人乳头瘤病毒自我采样干预的试点随机对照试验方案。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 May 10;11(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01648-y.
8
Feasibility and acceptability of human papillomavirus self-sampling compared with clinician sampling in urban areas of western China: a cross-sectional survey.中国西部城市地区人乳头瘤病毒自我采样与临床医生采样的可行性和可接受性:一项横断面调查
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 23;13:1524796. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1524796. eCollection 2025.
9
Motivations and Preferences for Self-Sampled Human Papillomavirus Testing Among Average-and High-Risk Patients: An Exploratory Analysis.普通风险和高风险患者对人乳头瘤病毒自我采样检测的动机和偏好:一项探索性分析。
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2025 Mar 28;6(1):377-383. doi: 10.1089/whr.2024.0180. eCollection 2025.
10
Improving the Sensitivity-Specificity Balance of Human Papillomavirus Testing on Self- and Clinician-Collected Samples in South Africa.提高南非自我采集和临床医生采集样本中人类乳头瘤病毒检测的灵敏度-特异度平衡
JCO Glob Oncol. 2025 Apr;11:e2500037. doi: 10.1200/GO-25-00037. Epub 2025 Apr 28.