• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物类似药说明书的可读性评估。

Readability assessment of package leaflets of biosimilars.

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy Unit, Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, and Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 17;9(1):e024837. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024837.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024837
PMID:30659042
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6340469/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the degree of readability and the length of the package leaflets of biosimilars.

SETTING

The package leaflets analysed were downloaded from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) website.

PARTICIPANTS

The study sample included the package leaflets written in English of all the biosimilars that were authorised by the EMA on 31 August 2017, and whose content was available via the internet on that date (n=35).

DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional analytical study. The readability of the package leaflets of all biosimilars authorised by the EMA in August 2017 was determined applying the Flesch and Flesch-Kincaid formulas. The influence of the following variables on the readability and length was also analysed: package leaflet section, type of biosimilar, date of first authorisation of the biosimilar and type of medicine.

RESULTS

A considerable variation of the package leaflets length was found (3154±803). The readability of all the package leaflets overtook the recommended value for health-related written materials taking into account Flesch-Kincaid Index, and none of the package leaflets were easy to understand according to the Flesch Index. Statistically significant differences (p<0.05) were observed between the sections of package leaflets in readability indices and length. The most difficult sections to understand were those related with the therapeutic indication of medicine and the possible side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Package leaflets for authorised biosimilars may not fulfil the function for which they were designed. The competent organisations could be informed about the possible negative effect on the use of this type of medicines.

摘要

目的

评估生物类似药说明书的可读性和长度。

设置

分析的说明书从欧洲药品管理局(EMA)网站下载。

参与者

研究样本包括 2017 年 8 月 31 日 EMA 批准的所有生物类似药的英文说明书,且其内容在该日可通过互联网获取(n=35)。

设计

这是一项横断面分析研究。通过应用 Flesch 和 Flesch-Kincaid 公式来确定 2017 年 8 月 EMA 批准的所有生物类似药说明书的可读性。还分析了以下变量对说明书可读性和长度的影响:说明书章节、生物类似药类型、生物类似药首次批准日期和药物类型。

结果

说明书长度差异较大(3154±803)。考虑到 Flesch-Kincaid 指数,所有说明书的可读性均超过了与健康相关书面材料相关的推荐值,根据 Flesch 指数,没有一个说明书易于理解。在可读性指数和长度方面,说明书各章节之间存在显著差异(p<0.05)。最难理解的章节是与药物治疗指征和可能的副作用相关的章节。

结论

已批准生物类似药的说明书可能无法发挥其设计目的。可向相关主管组织通报这种类型药物使用的潜在负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a7b/6340469/f1551026ba14/bmjopen-2018-024837f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a7b/6340469/2f05015c84f9/bmjopen-2018-024837f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a7b/6340469/f1551026ba14/bmjopen-2018-024837f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a7b/6340469/2f05015c84f9/bmjopen-2018-024837f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a7b/6340469/f1551026ba14/bmjopen-2018-024837f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Readability assessment of package leaflets of biosimilars.生物类似药说明书的可读性评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 17;9(1):e024837. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024837.
2
Readability Analysis of the Package Leaflets for Biological Medicines Available on the Internet Between 2007 and 2013: An Analytical Longitudinal Study.2007年至2013年互联网上生物药品包装说明书的可读性分析:一项纵向分析研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 25;18(5):e100. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5145.
3
Readability assessment of package inserts of biological medicinal products from the European medicines agency website.欧洲药品管理局网站上生物药品包装说明书的可读性评估
Drug Saf. 2014 Jul;37(7):543-54. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0188-1.
4
Improving meningococcal MenACWY and 4CMenB/meningococcal group B vaccine-related health literacy in patients: Importance of readability of pharmaceutical Patient Leaflets.提高患者中与脑膜炎球菌性A、C、W、Y群及B群脑膜炎球菌结合疫苗(4CMenB)相关的健康素养:药品患者说明书可读性的重要性
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021 Aug;46(4):1109-1116. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13405. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
5
Readability of medicinal package leaflets: a systematic review.药品说明书的可读性:一项系统综述。
Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49:4. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2015049005559. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
6
[Grammatical readability of the package leaflets of the medicinal products most widely consumed and generating the highest expense in Spain during 2005].[2005年在西班牙消费量最大且费用最高的药品包装说明书的语法可读性]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2008 Sep-Oct;82(5):559-66. doi: 10.1590/s1135-57272008000500010.
7
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
8
Analysis of patient information leaflets provided by a district general hospital by the Flesch and Flesch-Kincaid method.采用 Flesch 和 Flesch-Kincaid 方法分析区综合医院提供的患者信息传单。
Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;64(13):1824-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02408.x.
9
A quality assessment of orthodontic patient information leaflets.正畸患者信息手册的质量评估
Prog Orthod. 2016;17:15. doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0128-y. Epub 2016 May 16.
10
[Problems identified in the package leaflets of the Portuguese non-generic medicines].[葡萄牙非专利药品包装说明书中发现的问题]
Acta Med Port. 2015 Jan-Feb;28(1):21-8. Epub 2015 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence and Impact of Missing Functional Elements on Information Comprehension using Audio and Text.缺失功能元素对使用音频和文本进行信息理解的影响及发生率。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2022 Feb 21;2021:697-706. eCollection 2021.
2
Assessing the Readability of Medicine Information Materials: The Case of Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital - Mixed Approach.评估医学信息材料的可读性:以提库尔·安贝萨专科医院为例——混合方法
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Mar 22;15:635-644. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S302275. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Readability of Online Materials for Rhinoplasty.隆鼻在线材料的可读性
World J Plast Surg. 2018 Jan;7(1):89-96.
2
Which outcomes are important to patients and families who have experienced paediatric acute respiratory illness? Findings from a mixed methods sequential exploratory study.经历儿科急性呼吸道疾病的患者及其家属重视哪些结果?一项混合方法序贯探索性研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 14;7(12):e018199. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018199.
3
Knowledge, attitude and practice of healthcare professionals towards infliximab and insulin glargine biosimilars: result of a UK web-based survey.
医疗保健专业人员对英夫利昔单抗和甘精胰岛素生物类似药的知识、态度和实践:一项基于英国网络调查的结果
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 21;7(6):e016730. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016730.
4
Low literacy and written drug information: information-seeking, leaflet evaluation and preferences, and roles for images.低文化水平与书面药物信息:信息寻求、传单评估与偏好以及图像的作用
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Dec;38(6):1372-1379. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0376-4. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
5
Readability Analysis of the Package Leaflets for Biological Medicines Available on the Internet Between 2007 and 2013: An Analytical Longitudinal Study.2007年至2013年互联网上生物药品包装说明书的可读性分析:一项纵向分析研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 25;18(5):e100. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5145.
6
Quantitative evaluation of an information leaflet to increase prompt help-seeking for gynaecological cancer symptoms.一份旨在增加对妇科癌症症状及时寻求帮助的信息手册的定量评估。
BMC Public Health. 2016 May 4;16:374. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3032-y.
7
Factors influencing subjects' comprehension of a set of medicine package inserts.影响受试者对一组药品包装说明书理解的因素。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Aug;38(4):888-98. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0305-6. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
8
Biosimilars: A Multidisciplinary Perspective.生物类似药:多学科视角
Clin Ther. 2016 May;38(5):1238-49. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.02.023. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
9
Health literacy: applying current concepts to improve health services and reduce health inequalities.健康素养:运用现有概念改善卫生服务和减少健康不平等。
Public Health. 2016 Mar;132:3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
10
Readability of discharge summaries: with what level of information are we dismissing our patients?出院小结的可读性:我们向患者传达的信息水平如何?
Am J Surg. 2016 Mar;211(3):631-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.12.005. Epub 2015 Dec 28.