Suppr超能文献

药品说明书的可读性:一项系统综述。

Readability of medicinal package leaflets: a systematic review.

作者信息

Pires Carla, Vigário Marina, Cavaco Afonso

出版信息

Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49:4. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2015049005559. Epub 2015 Feb 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To review studies on the readability of package leaflets of medicinal products for human use. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature review between 2008 and 2013 using the keywords "Readability and Package Leaflet" and "Readability and Package Insert" in the academic search engine Biblioteca do Conhecimento Online, comprising different bibliographic resources/databases. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses criteria were applied to prepare the draft of the report. Quantitative and qualitative original studies were included. Opinion or review studies not written in English, Portuguese, Italian, French, or Spanish were excluded. RESULTS We identified 202 studies, of which 180 were excluded and 22 were enrolled [two enrolling healthcare professionals, 10 enrolling other type of participants (including patients), three focused on adverse reactions, and 7 descriptive studies]. The package leaflets presented various readability problems, such as complex and difficult to understand texts, small font size, or few illustrations. The main methods to assess the readability of the package leaflet were usability tests or legibility formulae. Limitations with these methods included reduced number of participants; lack of readability formulas specifically validated for specific languages (e.g., Portuguese); and absence of an assessment on patients literacy, health knowledge, cognitive skills, levels of satisfaction, and opinions. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the package leaflets presented various readability problems. In this review, some methodological limitations were identified, including the participation of a limited number of patients and healthcare professionals, the absence of prior assessments of participant literacy, humor or sense of satisfaction, or the predominance of studies not based on role-plays about the use of medicines. These limitations should be avoided in future studies and be considered when interpreting the results.

摘要

目的 回顾关于人用药品包装说明书可读性的研究。方法 我们于2008年至2013年期间,在学术搜索引擎Biblioteca do Conhecimento Online中使用关键词“可读性与包装说明书”以及“可读性与包装插页”进行了系统的文献综述,该搜索引擎包含不同的书目资源/数据库。采用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目标准来编写报告草稿。纳入了定量和定性的原始研究。排除了非用英语、葡萄牙语、意大利语、法语或西班牙语撰写的观点或综述研究。结果 我们识别出202项研究,其中180项被排除,22项被纳入研究[两项纳入医疗保健专业人员,10项纳入其他类型参与者(包括患者),三项聚焦于不良反应,7项为描述性研究]。包装说明书存在各种可读性问题,如文本复杂难懂、字体小或插图少。评估包装说明书可读性的主要方法是可用性测试或易读性公式。这些方法的局限性包括参与者数量减少;缺乏专门针对特定语言(如葡萄牙语)验证的易读性公式;以及未对患者的读写能力、健康知识、认知技能、满意度和意见进行评估。结论 总体而言,包装说明书存在各种可读性问题。在本综述中,识别出了一些方法学上的局限性,包括参与的患者和医疗保健专业人员数量有限、缺乏对参与者读写能力、幽默感或满意度的事先评估,或者以药品使用角色扮演为基础的研究占主导地位。这些局限性应在未来研究中避免,并在解释结果时予以考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/490a/4386563/4b465063f78f/0034-8910-rsp-S0034-89102015049005559-gf01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验