• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

任务情境加载诱发反应性认知控制:一项关于皮质和脑干活动的功能磁共振成像研究。

Task context load induces reactive cognitive control: An fMRI study on cortical and brain stem activity.

作者信息

Mäki-Marttunen Veronica, Hagen Thomas, Espeseth Thomas

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Postbox 1094, 0317, Oslo, Norway.

Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research (NORMENT), KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Ullevål Hospital, Building 49, Kirkeveien 166, Postbox 4956, 0424, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Aug;19(4):945-965. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00691-6.

DOI:10.3758/s13415-019-00691-6
PMID:30659515
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6711881/
Abstract

Cognitive control is a highly dynamic process that relies on flexible engagement of prefrontal areas and of neuromodulatory systems in order to adapt to changing demands. A range of internal and external factors come into play when individuals engage in a task requiring cognitive control. Here we investigated whether increased working memory (WM) demands would induce a flexible change in cognitive control mode in young healthy individuals. We developed a novel variant of the well-known AX-continuous performance task (AX-CPT). We manipulated the cognitive demands of maintaining task-relevant contextual information and studied the impact of this manipulation on behavior and brain activity. We expected that low WM load would allow for a more effortful, proactive strategy, while high WM load would induce a strategy of less effortful, stimulus-driven reactive control. In line with our hypothesis, a web-based experiment revealed that increased load was associated with more reactive behavioral responses, and this finding was independently replicated in behavioral data acquired in the MRI scanner. The results from brain activity showed that the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was activated by cues in the proactive mode and by probes in the reactive mode. The analysis of task-induced brain stem activity indicated that both the dopaminergic and noradrenergic systems are involved in updating context representations, and that, respectively, these systems mediate a gating signal to the control network and are involved in the dynamic regulation of task engagement.

摘要

认知控制是一个高度动态的过程,它依赖于前额叶区域和神经调节系统的灵活参与,以适应不断变化的需求。当个体从事需要认知控制的任务时,一系列内部和外部因素都会发挥作用。在这里,我们研究了工作记忆(WM)需求的增加是否会在年轻健康个体中诱导认知控制模式的灵活变化。我们开发了一种著名的AX连续性能任务(AX-CPT)的新颖变体。我们操纵了维持与任务相关的情境信息的认知需求,并研究了这种操纵对行为和大脑活动的影响。我们预计,低WM负荷将允许采用更费力的主动策略,而高WM负荷将诱导采用不那么费力的、刺激驱动的反应性控制策略。与我们的假设一致,一项基于网络的实验表明,负荷增加与更多的反应性行为反应相关,并且这一发现独立地在MRI扫描仪中获取的行为数据中得到了重复。大脑活动的结果表明,右侧背外侧前额叶皮层在主动模式下被线索激活,在反应模式下被探测激活。对任务诱导的脑干活动的分析表明,多巴胺能和去甲肾上腺素能系统都参与了情境表征的更新,并且这些系统分别介导了一个向控制网络的门控信号,并参与了任务参与的动态调节。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/932d/6711881/a946c3bcb881/13415_2019_691_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/932d/6711881/9b9dd1309188/13415_2019_691_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/932d/6711881/afe45ca87aad/13415_2019_691_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/932d/6711881/fed503e4d364/13415_2019_691_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/932d/6711881/de5ae2dc8c0d/13415_2019_691_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/932d/6711881/4499494b5961/13415_2019_691_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/932d/6711881/392beb7cd22d/13415_2019_691_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/932d/6711881/096bfc64dda8/13415_2019_691_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/932d/6711881/a946c3bcb881/13415_2019_691_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/932d/6711881/9b9dd1309188/13415_2019_691_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/932d/6711881/afe45ca87aad/13415_2019_691_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/932d/6711881/fed503e4d364/13415_2019_691_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/932d/6711881/de5ae2dc8c0d/13415_2019_691_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/932d/6711881/4499494b5961/13415_2019_691_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/932d/6711881/392beb7cd22d/13415_2019_691_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/932d/6711881/096bfc64dda8/13415_2019_691_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/932d/6711881/a946c3bcb881/13415_2019_691_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Task context load induces reactive cognitive control: An fMRI study on cortical and brain stem activity.任务情境加载诱发反应性认知控制:一项关于皮质和脑干活动的功能磁共振成像研究。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Aug;19(4):945-965. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00691-6.
2
Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex GABA Concentration in Humans Predicts Working Memory Load Processing Capacity.人类背外侧前额叶皮质中的γ-氨基丁酸浓度可预测工作记忆负荷处理能力。
J Neurosci. 2016 Nov 16;36(46):11788-11794. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1970-16.2016.
3
Inhibit, switch, and update: A within-subject fMRI investigation of executive control.抑制、转换和更新:一项关于执行控制的被试内 fMRI 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Sep;132:107134. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107134. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
4
Age-related differences in brain activation during working memory updating: An fMRI study.年龄相关的工作记忆更新过程中大脑激活的差异:一项 fMRI 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 17;138:107335. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107335. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
5
Immediate versus delayed control demands elicit distinct mechanisms for instantiating proactive control.即时控制需求与延迟控制需求引发了用于实例化主动控制的不同机制。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Aug;19(4):910-926. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-00684-x.
6
Dopamine D Binding Potential Modulates Neural Signatures of Working Memory in a Load-Dependent Fashion.多巴胺 D 结合潜能以依赖负荷的方式调节工作记忆的神经特征。
J Neurosci. 2019 Jan 16;39(3):537-547. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1493-18.2018. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
7
Effective connectivity within the frontoparietal control network differentiates cognitive control and working memory.前额顶叶控制网络内的有效连通性区分了认知控制和工作记忆。
Neuroimage. 2015 Feb 1;106:144-53. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.039. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
8
Context-dependent modulation of cognitive control involves different temporal profiles of fronto-parietal activity.语境依赖的认知控制调节涉及额顶叶活动的不同时间特征。
Neuroimage. 2019 Apr 1;189:755-762. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
9
Brain connectivity during resting state and subsequent working memory task predicts behavioural performance.静息状态和随后的工作记忆任务期间的大脑连通性可预测行为表现。
Cortex. 2012 Oct;48(9):1187-96. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.07.006. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
10
Measuring Cognitive Flexibility with the Flexible Item Selection Task: From fMRI Adaptation to Individual Connectome Mapping.使用灵活项目选择任务测量认知灵活性:从 fMRI 适应到个体连接组映射。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Jun;32(6):1026-1045. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01536. Epub 2020 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive control states and traits modulate lexical competition during word production.认知控制状态和特质在词汇生成过程中调节词汇竞争。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 14;15(1):25381. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10039-5.
2
Neural Mechanisms Supporting the Relationship between Working Memory Capacity and Proactive Control.支持工作记忆容量与主动控制之间关系的神经机制。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 12:2025.05.09.653198. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.09.653198.
3
Categorical and dimensional aspects of stimulant medication effects in adult patients with ADHD and healthy controls.

本文引用的文献

1
Ocular signatures of proactive versus reactive cognitive control in young adults.年轻人主动型与反应型认知控制的眼部特征。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Oct;18(5):1049-1063. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0621-5.
2
Locus Coeruleus Activity Strengthens Prioritized Memories Under Arousal.蓝斑核活动在觉醒状态下增强优先记忆。
J Neurosci. 2018 Feb 7;38(6):1558-1574. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2097-17.2017. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
3
Frontal Cortex and the Hierarchical Control of Behavior.前额皮质与行为的层级控制。
多动症成年患者和健康对照中兴奋剂药物疗效的分类和维度方面。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jul 10;15:1412178. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1412178. eCollection 2024.
4
Changes in Perceived Mental Load and Motor Performance during Practice-to-Learn and Practice-to-Maintain in Basketball.在篮球的练习到学习和练习到保持阶段中,感知心理负荷和运动表现的变化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 6;20(5):4664. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054664.
5
Imbalanced weighting of proactive and reactive control as a marker of risk-taking propensity.作为冒险倾向的标志物,积极和消极控制之间的不平衡加权。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 20;18(1):e0277246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277246. eCollection 2023.
6
Cognitive flexibility: neurobehavioral correlates of changing one's mind.认知灵活性:改变主意的神经行为相关性。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Apr 25;33(9):5436-5446. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac431.
7
The influence of context representations on cognitive control states.语境表征对认知控制状态的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Oct 18;7(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00443-0.
8
Cognitive and contextual factors modulating grammar learning at older ages.调节老年人语法学习的认知和情境因素。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Aug 31;14:943392. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.943392. eCollection 2022.
9
The relative role of executive control and personality traits in grit.执行控制与人格特质在坚毅品质中的相对作用。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 22;17(6):e0269448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269448. eCollection 2022.
10
A Revised Framework for the Investigation of Expectation Update Versus Maintenance in the Context of Expectation Violations: The ViolEx 2.0 Model.期望违背情境下期望更新与维持的调查修订框架:ViolEx 2.0模型
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 11;12:726432. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.726432. eCollection 2021.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Feb;22(2):170-188. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
4
Working memory capacity and intra-individual variability of proactive control.工作记忆容量与主动控制的个体内变异性。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Jan;182:21-31. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
5
The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences.可靠性悖论:为何稳健的认知任务不能产生可靠的个体差异。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Jun;50(3):1166-1186. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1.
6
In vivo visualization of the locus coeruleus in humans: quantifying the test-retest reliability.在体可视化人类蓝斑:定量测试-再测试可靠性。
Brain Struct Funct. 2017 Dec;222(9):4203-4217. doi: 10.1007/s00429-017-1464-5. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
7
Tempering Proactive Cognitive Control by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Right (but Not the Left) Lateral Prefrontal Cortex.经颅直流电刺激右侧(而非左侧)外侧前额叶皮层对主动认知控制的调节作用
Front Neurosci. 2017 May 23;11:282. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00282. eCollection 2017.
8
Toward a Rational and Mechanistic Account of Mental Effort.迈向对心理努力的理性与机械论解释
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jul 25;40:99-124. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031526. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
9
Modulation of locus coeruleus activity by novel oddball stimuli.新型异常刺激对蓝斑核活动的调制。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2018 Apr;12(2):577-584. doi: 10.1007/s11682-017-9700-4.
10
A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.蓝斑-去甲肾上腺素对工作记忆容量和注意力控制个体差异的解释。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1282-1311. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1220-5.