Students' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Integrative Functional Gastroenterology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Clin Nutr. 2019 Dec;38(6):2936-2942. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.12.036. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although the association between dietary Glycemic Index (GI), Glycemic Load (GL) and general/abdominal obesity has extensively been examined, limited data are available in this regard in developing countries. The aim of this study was to examine the association between dietary GI and GL with general and abdominal obesity.
This cross-sectional study was conducted among adults in Isfahan, Iran. Dietary GI and GL were assessed using a validated dish-based 106-item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (DS-FFQ). Data regarding height, weight and waist circumference were collected using a self-reported questionnaire. Overweight or obesity was defined as body mass index ≥25 kg/m, and abdominal obesity was defined as waist circumference ≥80 cm for women and ≥94 cm for men.
There was no significant association between dietary GI and GL and general obesity. After adjustment for potential confounders, participants in the highest quintile of dietary GI had a higher chance for abdominal obesity (OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.01-1.64), compared with those in the lowest quintile. No significant association was observed between dietary GL and abdominal obesity. After adjustment for potential confounders, women in the top quintile of dietary GI had higher chance for abdominal obesity compared with those in the bottom quintile (OR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.02-2.15). No significant association was found between dietary GI and abdominal obesity among men. We failed to find any significant association between dietary GI and general obesity in either gender [Comparing top vs. bottom quintiles, for men: OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.74-1.29 and for women: OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.75-1.40]. No significant association was found between dietary GL and general [for men: OR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.85-1.49 and for women: OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.76-1.35], as well as abdominal obesity [for men: OR: 1.21; 95% CI: 0.88-1.67 and for women: OR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.88-1.77].
We found a significant positive association between dietary GI and abdominal obesity. When we conducted analyses stratified by gender, we also observed such association in women, but not in men. No other significant associations were observed between dietary GI and GL with general or abdominal obesity.
尽管饮食血糖指数(GI)和血糖负荷(GL)与一般/腹部肥胖之间的关联已得到广泛研究,但在发展中国家,这方面的数据有限。本研究旨在探讨饮食 GI 和 GL 与一般和腹部肥胖之间的关系。
这项横断面研究在伊朗伊斯法罕的成年人中进行。使用经过验证的基于菜肴的 106 项半定量食物频率问卷(DS-FFQ)评估饮食 GI 和 GL。使用自我报告的问卷收集身高、体重和腰围数据。超重或肥胖定义为体重指数≥25kg/m2,腹部肥胖定义为女性腰围≥80cm,男性腰围≥94cm。
饮食 GI 和 GL 与一般肥胖之间没有显著关联。在调整潜在混杂因素后,饮食 GI 最高五分位组的参与者患腹部肥胖的几率更高(OR:1.29;95%CI:1.01-1.64),而饮食 GI 最低五分位组的参与者则更低。饮食 GL 与腹部肥胖之间也没有显著关联。在调整潜在混杂因素后,饮食 GI 最高五分位组的女性患腹部肥胖的几率高于最低五分位组(OR:1.48;95%CI:1.02-2.15)。在男性中,饮食 GI 与腹部肥胖之间没有显著关联。我们没有发现饮食 GI 与一般肥胖之间的任何显著关联,无论在男性还是女性中(比较最高五分位与最低五分位,男性:OR:0.97;95%CI:0.74-1.29;女性:OR:1.01;95%CI:0.75-1.40)。饮食 GL 与一般肥胖(男性:OR:1.13;95%CI:0.85-1.49;女性:OR:1.01;95%CI:0.76-1.35)以及腹部肥胖(男性:OR:1.21;95%CI:0.88-1.67;女性:OR:1.25;95%CI:0.88-1.77)之间也没有显著关联。
我们发现饮食 GI 与腹部肥胖之间存在显著的正相关关系。当我们按性别进行分析时,我们也观察到女性中存在这种关联,但男性中没有。饮食 GI 和 GL 与一般或腹部肥胖之间没有其他显著关联。