State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin 130117, PR China.
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin 130117, PR China.
Chemosphere. 2019 Apr;221:433-440. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.062. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
Although in vitro assay is an ideal alternative method for the in vivo toxicity prediction, different in vivo-in vitro correlations have been observed for the toxicity endpoints obtained from different levels of species. In this paper, theoretical in vivo-in vitro toxicity correlations have been developed for cytotoxicity versus human, mammalian and fish toxicity, respectively. These theoretical models were then used to investigate the correlations and the influencing factors between in vivo and in vitro toxicity. Bio-uptake equilibrium theory can well explain why there is a significant correlation between fish and cell toxicity (R = 0.70); why human toxicity is very close to fish toxicity; and why hydrophobic compounds exhibit relatively greater toxicity than reactive or specifically-acting compounds to human and fish as compared to cells. The kinetic theory can well explain why there is a very poor relationship between mammal and cell toxicity (R = 0.44). This paper reveals that polar and ionized compounds can more easily pass through cell membrane and have greater bioconcentration potential. Increasing of hydrophobicity and ionization can increase the cytotoxicity. Inclusion of descriptors representing hydrophobicity, ionization, acidity and absorption into the correlation equations can significantly improve the correlations of cytotoxicity with human and fish toxicity (R > 0.8), but not with mammal toxicity (R = 0.49). These descriptors reflect the differences of the toxicodynamics and toxicokinetics between cells and organisms.
尽管体外分析是预测体内毒性的理想替代方法,但在不同物种的不同毒性终点中观察到了不同的体内-体外相关性。本文分别为细胞毒性与人体、哺乳动物和鱼类毒性建立了理论上的体内-体外毒性相关性。然后,使用这些理论模型研究了体内和体外毒性之间的相关性及其影响因素。生物摄取平衡理论很好地解释了为什么鱼类毒性和细胞毒性之间存在显著相关性(R=0.70);为什么人体毒性与鱼类毒性非常接近;以及为什么与细胞相比,疏水性化合物对人体和鱼类的毒性比反应性或特定作用化合物的毒性相对更大。动力学理论很好地解释了为什么哺乳动物和细胞毒性之间的关系非常差(R=0.44)。本文揭示了极性和离子化化合物更容易穿透细胞膜,具有更大的生物富集潜力。疏水性和离化度的增加会增加细胞毒性。将代表疏水性、离化度、酸度和吸收性的描述符纳入相关方程,可以显著提高细胞毒性与人体和鱼类毒性的相关性(R>0.8),但与哺乳动物毒性的相关性(R=0.49)没有显著提高。这些描述符反映了细胞和生物体之间毒动学和毒代动力学的差异。