Suppr超能文献

烟草控制中的基层官僚作风:旁遮普邦贾朗达尔地区卫生部门的定性研究

Street-Level Bureaucracy in Tobacco Control: A Qualitative Study of Health Department in District Jalandhar, Punjab.

作者信息

Menon Shaveta

机构信息

Centre of Social Medicine and Community Health, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Indian J Community Med. 2018 Oct-Dec;43(4):270-273. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_82_18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The implementers of the tobacco control policy in the field have been neglected by the policymakers. They are the ones who have first-hand knowledge and their experiences in the field are not being used to bring about changes in the area of tobacco control.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this paper is to critically examine how Michael Lipsky's concept of street-level bureaucracy can be used to address tobacco control in the health department in district Jalandhar of Punjab.

METHODS

Semi-structured interview schedules were used to interview Senior Medical Officers/Nodal Officers and Health Supervisors/Sanitary inspectors in four out of ten Community Health Centers and District hospital in Jalandhar. Data so collected were subjected to the process of inductive analysis and themes developed within the framework given by Lipsky.

RESULTS

The street-level bureaucrats (SLBs) were not given adequate training, and various organizational resources for tobacco control are missing in the district. There are threats and challenges which are faced by them in the field, and they do not exercise decision-making power to handle these barriers for effective implementation of the tobacco control program.

CONCLUSION

The government needs to be inclusive in the process of policymaking meaning that it can be more accommodative of the suggestions given by the SLBs and provide them with discretionary powers to exercise their role efficiently.

摘要

背景

烟草控制政策在实地的实施者被政策制定者忽视了。他们拥有第一手知识,但其在该领域的经验并未被用于推动烟草控制领域的变革。

目的

本文的目的是批判性地审视迈克尔·利普斯基的街头官僚概念如何用于解决旁遮普邦贾朗达尔地区卫生部门的烟草控制问题。

方法

采用半结构化访谈提纲,对贾朗达尔地区十所社区卫生中心中的四所以及地区医院的高级医务官/协调官员和卫生监督员/卫生检查员进行访谈。收集到的数据进行归纳分析,并在利普斯基给出的框架内形成主题。

结果

街头官僚未得到充分培训,该地区缺乏各种烟草控制组织资源。他们在实地面临威胁和挑战,并且在有效实施烟草控制项目时没有行使决策权来应对这些障碍。

结论

政府在政策制定过程中需要包容,这意味着它可以更多地接受街头官僚提出的建议,并赋予他们自由裁量权以有效地发挥其作用。

相似文献

1
Street-Level Bureaucracy in Tobacco Control: A Qualitative Study of Health Department in District Jalandhar, Punjab.
Indian J Community Med. 2018 Oct-Dec;43(4):270-273. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_82_18.
3
Frontline healthcare workers' experiences in implementing the TB-DM collaborative framework in Northern Ghana.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 23;21(1):861. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06883-6.
4
Doctors as street-level bureaucrats in a rural hospital in South Africa.
Rural Remote Health. 2016 Jan-Mar;16(1):3461. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
5
6
"": Street-level bureaucracy on the front line of primary care in the United Kingdom.
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 13;9(11):e21298. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21298. eCollection 2023 Nov.
8
Specialty Probation Officers as Street-Level Bureaucrats: Exploring How Discretion Is Perceived and Employed on a Mental Health Caseload.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2022 May;66(6-7):670-693. doi: 10.1177/0306624X21990783. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
9
Occupational Therapists as Street-Level Bureaucrats: Leveraging the Political Nature of Everyday Practice.
Can J Occup Ther. 2020 Apr;87(2):137-143. doi: 10.1177/0008417419892712. Epub 2019 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验