Hogan J S, Smith K L, Todhunter D A, Schoenberger P S
Department of Dairy Science, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Ohio State University, Wooster 44691.
Am J Vet Res. 1988 Sep;49(9):1537-9.
Comparisons were made among rapid latex agglutination tests and conventional biochemical tests used to identify Streptococcus agalactiae and Staphylococcus aureus. Ninety-eight streptococci and 149 staphylococci isolated from bulk tank milk were tested. Sensitivity and specificity for the latex agglutination test used for identification of Str agalactiae were 97.6 and 98.2%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for the latex agglutination test used for identification of S aureus were 90.2 and 67.5%, respectively. Of 25 staphylococci considered false-positive by the latex agglutination test, 14 (56%) were considered tube coagulase-positive. Fifteen staphylococci considered false-positive by latex agglutination test had biotypes representative of S hyicus of S xylosus.
对用于鉴定无乳链球菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的快速乳胶凝集试验与传统生化试验进行了比较。对从散装罐牛奶中分离出的98株链球菌和149株葡萄球菌进行了检测。用于鉴定无乳链球菌的乳胶凝集试验的灵敏度和特异性分别为97.6%和98.2%。用于鉴定金黄色葡萄球菌的乳胶凝集试验的灵敏度和特异性分别为90.2%和67.5%。在乳胶凝集试验判定为假阳性的25株葡萄球菌中,有14株(56%)被判定为试管凝固酶阳性。乳胶凝集试验判定为假阳性的15株葡萄球菌具有猪葡萄球菌或木糖葡萄球菌的生物型特征。